Advertisement

Epistemological Perspectives on IS-Development – A Consensus-Oriented Approach on Conceptual Modeling

  • Björn Niehaves
  • Karsten Klose
  • Ralf Knackstedt
  • Jörg Becker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3782)

Abstract

Within the information systems (IS) research discipline, conceptual modeling is widely discussed as a fundamental task for IS-development as it leads to shared domain knowledge between IS developers and business person-nel. As well as IS-research modeling takes place within a multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural context. Thereby, the (mostly implicit) assumptions made by dif-ferent researchers may vary fundamentally. As a result, it is important to ex-pose epistemological assumptions which underlie the work of different par-ticipants. Thus, we provide a framework which questions help to analyze and systematize the epistemological assumptions underlying IS research. We dem-onstrate the application of the framework on a special concept (the consensus-orientated approach) of conceptual modeling.

Keywords

IS development IS research conceptual modeling epistemological assumptions epistemological framework consensus-oriented approach 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alavi, M., Carlson, P., Brooke, G.: The Ecology of MIS Research: A Twenty Year Status Review. In: 10th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Boston, MA, pp. 363–375 (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Apel, K.-O.: Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. Routledge Kegan & Paul, London (1979)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baumann, P.: Erkenntnistheorie. Metzler, Stuttgart/Weimar (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker, J., Schütte, R.: Handelsinformationssysteme. Landsberg/Lech (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berkley, G.: Philosophical Works, London (1975)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bonjour, L.: Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalists Account of A Priori Justification, Cambridge/MA (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bunge, M.A.: Ontology I: The Furniture of the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Dordrecht, the Netherlands et al (1977)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burrell, G., Morgan, G.: Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, London, UK (1979)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carnap, R.: The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carnap, R., Hahn, H., Neurath, O.: Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis, Vienna, New York (1929)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, W., Hirschheim, R.: A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal 3, 197–235 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA (1965)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davidson, J.: Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford (1984)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Descartes, R.: Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gethmann, C.F.: Deduktion. In: Mittelstraß, J. (ed.) Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, Band 1. Stuttgart, Weimar (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glasersfeld, E.: Steps in the Construction of “Others” and “Reality”: A Study in Self- Regulation. In: Trappl, R. (ed.) Power, Autonomy, Utopia. London, New York, pp. 107–116 (1986)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glasersfeld, E.: The Construction of Knowledge, Seaside, CA (1987)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haak, S.: Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge, MA (1978)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Habermas, J.: Wahrheitstheorien. In: Fahrenbach, H. (ed.) Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Walter Schulz zum 60, pp. 211–265. Pfullingen, Geburtstag (1973)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hanson, P., Hunter, B.: Return of the A Priori. University of Calgary Press, Calgary (1992)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 1, 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K.: Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development. Communications of the ACM, 1199–1216 (1989)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford (1978)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kamlah, W., Lorenzen, P.: Logical Propaedeutic, Lanham, MD (1973)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kamlah, W., Lorenzen, P.: Logische Propädeutik. In: Vorschule des vernünftigen Redens, 3rd edn. Stuttgart, Weimar (1996)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kirkham, R.L.: Theories of Truth. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leibniz, G.-W.: Nouveaux Essais sur l’Entendement Humain. In: Leibniz, G.-W. (ed.) Sämtliche Schriften, Berlin, pp. 39–527 (1962)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Locke, J.: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford (1982)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Loose, J.: A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lorenzen, P.: Constructive Philosophy. The University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst (1987)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Luft, A.L.: Software-Engineering und konstruktive Wissenschaftstheorie. Ein Beitrag zur Methodologie des Software Engineering. Angewandte Informatik 3, 93–99 (1981)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mingers, J.: Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 240–259 (2001)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Baroudi, J.: Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 1–28 (1991)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ortner, E.: Methodenneutraler Fachentwurf, Stuttgart, Leipzig (1997)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Quine, W.V.O.: Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In: Quine, W.V.O. (ed.) From a Logical Point of View, pp. 20–46. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1961)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reich, B.H., Benbasat, I.: Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment between Business and Information Technology Objectives. MIS Quarterly 1, 81–113 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rott, H.: Schluß, induktiver. In: Mittelstraß, J. (ed.) Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie. Band 3, Stuttgart, Weimar, pp. 710–713 (1995)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Russell, B.: The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. In: Russell, B. (ed.) Logic and Knowledge. Essays 1901-1950, London, pp. 177–281 (1956)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schmitt, F.F.: Socializing Epistemology. The Social Dimension of Knowledge, Lanham, MD (1994)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schmitt, F.F.: Truth. A Primer. Westview Press, Boulder/CO (1995)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Seiffert, H.: Einführung in die Wissenschaftstheorie 1, 12th edn., München (1996)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Spinoza, B.: The Ethics; Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect; Selected Letters. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis (1992)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stenius, E.: Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A Critical Exposition of its Main Lines of Thought, Oxford (1960)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Strahringer, S.: Metamodellierung als Instrument des Methodenvergleichs – Eine Evaluierung am Beispiel objektorientierter Analysemethoden, Aachen (1996)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tarski, A.: The Semantic Concept of Truth and the foundation of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 341–375 (1944)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tarski, A.: The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages. In: Tarski, A. (ed.) Logic, Semantics, Mathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938, Oxford, pp. 152–278 (1956)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tarski, A.: Truth and Proof. In: Hughes, R.I.G. (ed.) A Philosophical Companion to First-Order-Logic, Indianapolis, IN, pp. 101–125 (1993)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    von Foerster, H.: Wissen und Gewissen. Versuch einer Brücke, 4th edn., Frankfurt a. M (1996)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling – A Research Agenda. Information Systems Research 4, 363–376 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling – A Research Agenda. Journal of Information Systems 2, 217–237 (2002)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Weber, R.: Editor’s Comment: Theoretically Speaking. MIS Quarterly 3, iii-xii (2003)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Weber, R.: The Refelexive Researcher. MIS Quarterly 4, v-xiv (2003)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wedekind, H.: Datenbanksysteme I, Eine konstruktive Einführung in die Datenverarbeitung in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung, 2nd edn. Mannheim et al (1981)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wittgenstein, L.: Tractatus Logico Philosophicus. Routledge, London (2001)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wyssusek, B., Schwartz, M.: Towards a Sociopragmatic-Constructivist Understanding of Information Systems. In: Gordon, S.R. (ed.) Computing Information Technology: The Human Side, pp. 267–297. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn Niehaves
    • 1
  • Karsten Klose
    • 1
  • Ralf Knackstedt
    • 1
  • Jörg Becker
    • 1
  1. 1.European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS)University of MuensterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations