Supporting Competency Development in Informal Workplace Learning

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3782)


This paper seeks to suggest ways to support informal, self-directed, work-integrated learning within organizations. We focus on a special type of learning in organizations, namely on competency development, that is a purposeful development of employee capabilities to perform well in a large array of situations. As competency development is inherently a self-directed development activity, we seek to support these activities primarily in an informal learning context. AD-HOC environments which allow employees context specific access to documents in a knowledge repository have been suggested to support learning in the workplace. In this paper, we suggest to use the competence performance framework as a means to enhance the capabilities of AD HOC environments to support competency development. The framework formalizes the tasks employees are working in and the competencies needed to perform the tasks. Relating tasks and competencies results in a competence performance structure, which structures both tasks and competencies in terms of learning prerequisites. We conclude with two scenarios that make use of methods established in informal learning research. The scenarios show how competence performance structures enhance feedback mechanisms in a coaching process between supervisor and employee and provide assistance for self directed learning from a knowledge repository.


Informal Learning Formal Concept Analysis Business Education Competency Development Learning Path 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cross, J.: Informal Learning - The other 80%, (2003)
  2. 2.
    Adkins, S.: We are the problem: We are selling Snake Oil (2003),
  3. 3.
    Dickover, N.T.: The Job is the Learning Environment: Performance-Centered Learning to Support Knowledge Worker Performance. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development 14, 3 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haskell, R.E.: Reengineering Corporate Training. In: Intellectual Capital and Transfer of Learning, Quorum Books (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindstaedt, S.: AD HOC - Integration von Arbeits- und Lernprozessen (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindstaedt, S.N., Farmer, J., Ley, T.: Betriebliche Weiterbildung. In: Haake, J., Schwabe, G., Wessner, M. (eds.) CSCL-Kompendium - Lehr- und Handbuch zum computerunterstützten kooperativen Lernen, Oldenbourg, München, pp. 423–434 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farmer, J., Lindstaedt, S.N., Droschl, G., Luttenberger, P.: AD-HOC - Work-integrated Technology-supported Teaching and Learning (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tobin, D.R.: All Learning Is Self-Directed: How Organisations Can Support and Encourage Independent Learning. American Society for Training & Development (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baumgartner, P., Payr, S.: Lernen mit Software. Österreichischer Studienverlag, Innsbruck (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hackett, S.: Educating for competency and reflective practice: fostering a conjoint approach in education and training. Journal of Workplace Learning 13(3), 103–112 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baitsch, C.: Lernen im Prozess der Arbeit - Zum Stand der internationalen Forschung. In: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Qualifikations-Entwicklungs-Management (ed.) Kompetenzent¬wick¬lung 1998: Forschungsstand und Forschungsperspektiven. Waxmann, Münster, pp. 269–337 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ley, T., Albert, D.: Identifying Employee Competencies in Dynamic Work Domains: Methodological Considerations and a Case Study. Journal of Universal Computer Science 9(12), 1500–1518 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergmann, B.: Arbeitsimmanente Kompetenzentwicklung. In: Bergmann, B., Fritsch, A., Göpfert, P., Richter, F., Wardanjan, B., Wilczek, S. (eds.) Kompetenzentwicklung und Berufsarbeit, Waxmann, Münster, pp. 11–39 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erpenbeck, J., Rosenstiel, L.v.: Einführung. In: Erpenbeck, J., Rosenstiel, L.v. (eds.) Handbuch Kompetenzmessung, Schäffer-Poeschl, Stuttgart, pp.IX-XL (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Staudt, E., Kriegesmann, B.: Weiterbildung: Ein Mythos zerbricht (nicht so leicht!). In: Staudt, E., Kailer, N., Kottmann, M., Kriegesmann, B., Meier, A.J., Muschik, C., Stephan, H., Ziegler, A. (eds.) Kompetenzentwicklung und Innovation, Waxmann, Münster (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Conlon, T.J.: A review of informal learning literature, theory and implications for practice in developing global professional competence. Journal of European Industrial Training 28(2/3/4), 283–295 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reich, J.R., Brockhausen, P., Lau, T., Reimer, U.: Ontology-Based Skills Management: Goals, Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Universal Computer Science 8(5), 505–515 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ehrlich, K.: Locating Expertise: Design Issues for an Expertise Locator System. In: Ackerman, M., Pipek, V., Wulf, V. (eds.) Sharing Expertise - Beyond Knowledge Management, pp. 137–158. MIT Press, Cambrigdge (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Probst, G.J.B., Deussen, A., Eppler, M.J., Raub, S.P.: Kompetenz-Management: Wie Individuen und Organisationen Kompetenz entwickeln. Gabler, Wiesbaden (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ley, T., Ulbrich, A.: Achieving benefits through integrating eLearning and Strategic Knowledge Management. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, o.S (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Efimova, L., Swaak, J.: Converging Knowledge Management, Training and e-learning: Scenarios to Make it Work. Journal of Universal Computer Science 9(6), 571–578 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Korossy, K.: Extending the theory of knowledge spaces: A competence-performance approach. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 205, 53–82 (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sandberg, J.: Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach. Academy of Management Journal 43(1), 9–25 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Know-CenterGrazAustria
  2. 2.Cognitive Science SectionUniversity of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations