Tool-Wear Monitoring Based on Continuous Hidden Markov Models

  • Antonio G. VallejoJr.
  • Juan A. Nolazco-Flores
  • Rubén Morales-Menéndez
  • L. Enrique Sucar
  • Ciro A. Rodríguez
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3773)

Abstract

In this work we propose to monitor the cutting tool-wear condition in a CNC-machining center by using continuous Hidden Markov Models (HMM). A database was built with the vibration signals obtained during the machining process. The workpiece used in the milling process was aluminum 6061. Cutting tests were performed on a Huron milling machine equipped with a Sinumerik 840D open CNC. We trained/tested the HMM under 18 different operating conditions. We identified three key transitions in the signals. First, the cutting tool touches the workpiece. Second, a stable waveform is observed when the tool is in contact with the workpiece. Third, the tool finishes the milling process. Considering these transitions, we use a five-state HMM for modeling the process. The HMMs are created by preprocessing the waveforms, followed by training step using Baum-Welch algorithm. In the recognition process, the signal waveform is also preprocessed, then the trained HMM are used for decoding. Early experimental results validate our proposal in exploiting speech recognition frameworks in monitoring machining centers. The classifier was capable of detecting the cutting tool condition within large variations of spindle speed and feed rate, and accuracy of 84.19%.

Keywords

Signal Processing and Analysis Remote Sensing Applications of Pattern Recognition Hidden Markov Models Tool-wear monitoring 

References

  1. 1.
    Abouelatta, O.B., Madl, J.: Surface roughness prediction based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations in turning operations. Materials Processing Technology (118), 269–277 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atlas, L., Ostendorf, M., Bernard, G.D.: Hidden markov models for monitoring machining tool-wear. IEEE, 3887–3890 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilmes, J.: What hmms can do. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, S.B., Mermelstein, P.: Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing 4(28), 357–366 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haber, R.E., Alique, A.: Intelligent process supervision for predicting tool wear in machining processes. Mechatronics (13), 825–849 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haber, R.E., Jiménez, J.E., Peres, C.R., Alique, J.R.: An investigation of tool-wear monitoring in a high-spped machining process. Sensors and Actuators A (116), 539–545 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwaki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G., Van Brussel, H.: Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Annals of the CIRP 48(2), 527–540 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, K.Y., Kang, M.C., Jeong, Y.H., Lee, D.W., Kim, J.S.: Simulation of surface roughness and profile in high-speed and milling. Materials Processing Technology (113), 410–415 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liang, S.Y., Hecker, R.L., Landers, R.G.: Machining process monitoring and control: The state-of-the-art. ASME International Mechanical Engenieering Congress and Exposition, 1–12 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Owsley, L.M.D., Atlas, L.E., Bernard, G.D.: Self-organizing feature maps and hidden markov models for machine-tool monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 45(11), 2787–2798 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rabiner, L.R.: A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 77(2), 257–286 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rabiner, L.R., Juang, B.H.: Fundamentals of speech recognition. Prentice-Hall, New-Jersey (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saglam, H., Unuvar, A.: Tool condition monitoring in milling based on cutting forces by a neural network. International Journal of Production Research 41(7), 1519–1532 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsai, Y.H., Chen, J.C., Lou, S.J.: An in-process surface recognition system based on neural networks in end milling cutting operations. Machine Tools and Manufacture (39), 583–605 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, G.M., Lin, C.: A hidden markov model approach to the study of random tool motion during machining. Technical reportGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio G. VallejoJr.
    • 1
  • Juan A. Nolazco-Flores
    • 2
  • Rubén Morales-Menéndez
    • 2
  • L. Enrique Sucar
    • 3
  • Ciro A. Rodríguez
    • 2
  1. 1.ITESM Laguna Campus, Mechatronic Dept., Torreón, Coah.México
  2. 2.ITESM Monterrey CampusMonterreyMéxico
  3. 3.ITESM Morelos CampusCuernavacaMéxico

Personalised recommendations