Advertisement

Applying Modular Method Engineering to Validate and Extend the RESCUE Requirements Process

  • Jolita Ralyté
  • Neil Maiden
  • Colette Rolland
  • Rébecca Deneckère
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3716)

Abstract

Configuring and applying complex requirements processes in organisations remains a challenging problem. This paper reports the application of the Map-driven Modular Method Re-engineering approach (MMMR) to a research-based requirements process called RESCUE. RESCUE had evolved in the light of research findings and client requests. The MMMR approach was applied to model the RESCUE process, identify omissions and weaknesses, and to reason about improvements to RESCUE that are currently being implemented. Results have implications for both the scalability and effectiveness of the MMMR approach and for innovative requirements processes such as RESCUE.

Keywords

System Boundary Requirement Process Requirement Engineer Rescue Process Rescue Requirement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, C.: The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baddeley, A.D.: Human memory: Theory and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goetz, R., Rupp, C.: Psychotherapy for Systems Requirements. In: Proceedings 2nd IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics, pp. 75–80. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammond, J., Rawlings, R., Hall, A.: Will It Work? In: Proceedings 5th IEEE International Symposium Requirements Engineering, pp. 102–109. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jarke, M., Rolland, C., Sutcliffe, A., Domges, R.: The NATURE requirements Engineering. Shaker, Aachen (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leffingwell, D., Widrig, D.: Managing Software Requirements: A Unified Approach. Addison-Wesley-Longman, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maiden, N.A.M., Rugg, G.: ACRE: Selecting Methods For Requirements Acquisition. Software Engineering Journal 11(3), 183–192 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maiden, N.A.M., Cisse, M., Perez, H., Manuel, D.: CREWS Validation Frames: Patterns for Validating System Requirements. In: Proceedings REFSQ 1998 Workshop (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maiden, N.A.M., Jones, S.V., Flynn, M.: Innovative Requirements Engineering Applied to ATM. In: Proceedings ATM (Air Traffic Management), Budapest, June 23-27 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maiden, N.A.M., Jones, S.V., Manning, S., Greenwood, J., Renou, L.: Model-Driven Requirements Engineering: Synchronising Models in an Air Traffic Management Case Study. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 368–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mavin, A., Maiden, N.A.M.: Determining Socio-Technical Systems Requirements: Experiences with Generating and Walking Through Scenarios. In: Proceedings 11th International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 213–222. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ralyté, J., Rolland, C.: An Approach for Method Reengineering. In: Kunii, H.S., Jajodia, S., Sølvberg, A. (eds.) ER 2001. LNCS, vol. 2224, pp. 471–484. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robertson, S., Robertson, J.: Mastering the Requirements Process. Addison-Wesley-Longman, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rolland, C., Prakash, N., Benjamen, A.: A multi-model view of process modelling. Requirements Engineering Journal, 169–187 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sutcliffe, A.G., Maiden, N.A.M., Minocha, S., Manuel, D.: Supporting Scenario-Based Requirements Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(12), 1072–1088 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Roundtrip from Research to Practice. In: Proceedings 12th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 4–7. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vicente, K.: Cognitive work analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.M.: Understanding “Why” in Software Process Modelling, Analysis and Design. In: Proceedings, 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 159–168. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zachos, K., Maiden, N.A.M.: ART-SCENE: Enhancing Scenario Walkthroughs with Multi-Media Scenarios. In: Proceedings 12th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 360–361. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jolita Ralyté
    • 1
  • Neil Maiden
    • 2
  • Colette Rolland
    • 3
  • Rébecca Deneckère
    • 3
  1. 1.CUIUniversity of GenevaGenève 4Switzerland
  2. 2.Centre for HCI DesignCity UniversityLondonUK
  3. 3.CRIUniversity of Paris 1 – SorbonneParisFrance

Personalised recommendations