Advertisement

Decentralized Computation of Threshold Crossing Alerts

  • Fetahi Wuhib
  • Mads Dam
  • Rolf Stadler
  • Alexander Clemm
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3775)

Abstract

Threshold crossing alerts (TCAs) indicate to a management system that a management variable, associated with the state, performance or health of the network, has crossed a certain threshold. The timely detection of TCAs is essential to proactive management. This paper focuses on detecting TCAs for network-level variables, which are computed from device-level variables using aggregation functions, such as SUM, MAX, or AVERAGE. It introduces TCA-GAP, a novel protocol for producing network-wide TCAs in a scalable and robust manner. The protocol maintains a spanning tree and uses local thresholds, which adapt to changes in network state and topology, by allowing nodes to trade unused “threshold space”. Scalability is achieved through computing the thresholds locally and through distributing the aggregation process across all nodes. Fault-tolerance is achieved by a mechanism that reconstructs the spanning tree after node addition, removal or failure. Simulation results on an ISP topology show that the protocol successfully concentrates traffic overhead to periods where the aggregate is close to the given threshold.

Keywords

Span Tree Aggregation Function Random Walk Model Local Weight Global Threshold 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Wuhib, F., Dam, M., Stadler, R., Clemm, A.: Decentralized computation of threshold crossing alerts. Technical report, KTH Royal Institute of Technology (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Madden, S., Franklin, M.J., Hellerstein, J.M., Hong, W.: TAG: A Tiny AGggretation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. In: Proc. 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 131–146 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dam, M., Stadler, R.: A generic protocol for network state aggregation. In: Proc. Radiovetenskap och Kommunikation (RVK) (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dilman, M., Raz, D.: Efficient reactive monitoring. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC) 20(4) (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breitgand, D., Dolev, D., Raz, D.: Accounting mechanism for membership size-dependent pricing of multicast traffic. In: Networked Group Communication, pp. 276–286 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Renesse, R.: The importance of aggregation. In: Schiper, A., Shvartsman, M.M.A.A., Weatherspoon, H., Zhao, B.Y. (eds.) Future Directions in Distributed Computing. LNCS, vol. 2584, pp. 87–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gupta, I., van Renesse, R., Birman, K.: Scalable fault-tolerant aggregation in large process groups. In: Proc. Conf. on Dependable Systems and Networks, pp. 433–442 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kempe, D., Dobra, A., Gehrke, J.: Gossip-based computation of aggregate information. In: FOCS 2003: Proceedings of the 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Washington, DC, USA, p. 482. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharaf, M.A., Beaver, J., Labrinidis, A., Chrysanthis, P.K.: Tina: a scheme for temporal coherency-aware in-network aggregation. In: MobiDe 2003: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on Data engineering for wireless and mobile access, pp. 69–76. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olston, C., Jiang, J., Widom, J.: Adaptive filters for continuous queries over distributed data streams. In: SIGMOD 2003: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pp. 563–574. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roussopoulos, N., Deligiannakis, A., Kotidis, Y.: Hierarchical in-network data aggregation with quality guarantees. In: Proc. 9th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT) (March 2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bawa, M., Garcia-Molina, H., Gionis, A., Motwani, R.: Estimating aggregates on a peer-to-peer network (2003), (Manuscript)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dolev, S., Israeli, A., Moran, S.: Self-stabilization of dynamic systems assuming only read/write atomicity. Distributed Computing 7, 3–16 (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ANSI/IEEE Std 802.1D. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perlman, R.: Interconnections, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Longman, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spring, N., Mahajan, R., Wetherall, D.: Measuring ISP topologies with Rocketfuel. In: Proc. ACM/SIGCOMM (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lim, K.S., Stadler, R.: SIMPSON — a SIMple Pattern Simulator fOr Networks (2005), http://www.comet.columbia.edu/adm/software.htm
  18. 18.
    Lim, K.S., Stadler, R.: Weaver — realizing a scalable management paradigm on commodity routers. In: Proc. 8th IFIP/IEEE Int. Symp. on Integrated Network Management (IM 2003) (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fetahi Wuhib
    • 1
  • Mads Dam
    • 1
  • Rolf Stadler
    • 1
  • Alexander Clemm
    • 2
  1. 1.KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Cisco SystemsSan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations