Advertisement

Using Multiple Discriminant Analysis Approach for Linear Text Segmentation

  • Zhu Jingbo
  • Ye Na
  • Chang Xinzhi
  • Chen Wenliang
  • Benjamin K Tsou
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3651)

Abstract

Research on linear text segmentation has been an on-going focus in NLP for the last decade, and it has great potential for a wide range of applications such as document summarization, information retrieval and text understanding. However, for linear text segmentation, there are two critical problems involving automatic boundary detection and automatic determination of the number of segments in a document. In this paper, we propose a new domain-independent statistical model for linear text segmentation. In our model, Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA) criterion function is used to achieve global optimization in finding the best segmentation by means of the largest word similarity within a segment and the smallest word similarity between segments. To alleviate the high computational complexity problem introduced by the model, genetic algorithms (GAs) are used. Comparative experimental results show that our method based on MDA criterion functions has achieved higher Pk measure (Beeferman) than that of the baseline system using TextTiling algorithm.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Salton, G., Singhal, A., Buckley, C., Mitra, M.: Automatic text decomposition using text segments and text themes. In: Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Hypertext, Bethesda, Maryland, United States, pp. 53–65 (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hearst, M.A.: Multi-paragraph segmentation of expository text. In: Proceedings of the 32th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, New Mexico, pp. 9–16 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hearst, M.A.: TextTiling: segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Computational Linguistics 23(1), 33–64 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Youmans, G.: A new tool for discourse analysis: The vocabulary management profile. Language 67(4), 763–789 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morris, J., Hirst, G.: Lexical cohesion computed by thesauri relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics 17(1), 21–42 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kozima, H.: Text segmentation based on similarity between words. In: Proceedings of the 31th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Student Session, pp. 286–288 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reynar, J.C.: An automatic method of finding topic boundaries. In: Proceedings of the 32 nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Student Session, Las Cruces, New Mexico, pp. 331–333 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beeferman, D., Berger, A., Lafferty, J.: Text segmentation using exponential models. In: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages, Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 35–46 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Passoneau, R., Litman, D.J.: Intention-based segmentation: Human reliability and correlation with linguistic cues. In: Proceedings of the 31st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 148–155 (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ponte, J.M., Croft, B.W.: Text segmentation by topic. In: Proceeding of the first European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries. U.Mass. Computer Science Technical Report TR97-18 (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reynar, J.C.: Statistical models for topic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 357–364 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirschberg, J., Grosz, B.: Intentional features of local and global discourse. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Spoken Language Systems, pp. 441–446 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi, F.Y.Y.: Advances in domain independent linear text segmentation. In: Proc. of NAACL-2000 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choi, F.Y.Y., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Moore, J.: Latent semantic analysis for text segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 109–117 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blei, D.M., Moreno, P.J.: Topic segmentation with an aspect hidden Markov model. Tech. Rep. CRL 2001-07, COMPAQ Cambridge Research Lab (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yaari, Y.: Segmentation of expository texts by hierarchical agglomerative clustering. In: Proceedings of the conference on recent advances in natural language processing, pp. 59–65 (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heinonen, O.: Optimal multi-paragraph text segmentation by dynamic programming. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on computational linguistics, pp. 1484–1486 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Utiyama, M., Isahara, H.: A statistical model for domain-independent text segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 9th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics, pp. 491–498 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kehagias, A., Fragkou, P., Petridis, V.: Linear Text Segmentation using a Dynamic Programming Algorithm. In: Proceedings of 10th Conference of European chapter of the association for computational linguistics (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duda, R., Hart, P., Stork, D.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tol, J.T., Gonzaiez, R.C.: Pattern recognition principles. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1974)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tianshun, Y., Jingbo, Z., li, Z., Ying, Y.: Natural language processing-research on making computers understand human languages. Tsinghua university press (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhu Jingbo
    • 1
  • Ye Na
    • 1
  • Chang Xinzhi
    • 1
  • Chen Wenliang
    • 1
  • Benjamin K Tsou
    • 2
  1. 1.Natural Language Processing Laboratory, Institute of Computer Software and TheoryNortheastern UniversityShenyangP.R. China
  2. 2.Language Information Sciences Research CentreCity University of Hong KongHK

Personalised recommendations