Groups, Group Cognition and Groupware

  • Gerry Stahl
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3706)


More than we realize it, knowledge is often constructed through interactions among people in small groups. The Internet, by allowing people to communicate globally in limitless combinations, has opened enormous opportunities for the creation of knowledge and understanding. A major barrier today is the poverty of adequate groupware. To design more powerful software that can facilitate the building of collaborative knowledge, we need to better understand the nature of group cognition—the processes whereby ideas are developed by small groups. We need to analyze interaction at both the individual and the group unit of analysis in order to understand the variety of processes that groupware should be supporting. This paper will look closely at an empirical example of knowledge being constructed by a small group and suggest implications for groupware design.


Word Problem Group Unit Adjacency Pair Math Problem Conversation Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shannon, C., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Chicago (1949)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Interaction Book Company, Edina (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hutchins, E.: Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engeström, Y.: Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In: Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., Punamäki, R.-L. (eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory, pp. 19–38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garfinkel, H.: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heidegger, M.: Being and Time: A Translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). SUNY Press, Albany (1927/1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vygotsky, L.: Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1930/1978)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bakhtin, M.: Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (V. McGee, Trans.). University of Texas Press, Austin (1986)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wessner, M., Pfister, H.-R.: Group formation in computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (Group 2001), Boulder, CO, pp. 24–31 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stahl, G., Herrmann, T.: Intertwining perspectives and negotiation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Group 1999), Phoenix, AZ, pp. 316–324 (1999), Available at
  12. 12.
    Vogel, D., Nunamaker, J., Applegate, L., Konsynski, B.: Group decision support systems: Determinants of success. In: Proceedings of Decision Support Systems (DSS 1987), pp. 118–128 (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stahl, G.: Groupware goes to school. In: Haake, J.M., Pino, J.A. (eds.) CRIWG 2002. LNCS, vol. 2440, pp. 7–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2002), Available at CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stahl, G.: Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006), Available at, Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zemel, A., Xhafa, F., Stahl, G.: Analyzing the organization of collaborative math problem-solving in online chats using statistics and conversation analysis. In: Fukś, H., Lukosch, S., Salgado, A.C. (eds.) CRIWG 2005. LNCS, vol. 3706, pp. 271–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garcia, A., Jacobs, J.B.: The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction 34(4), 337–367 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sacks, H.: Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruner, J.: Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wegerif, R.: A dialogical understanding of the relationship between CSCL and teaching thinking skills. In: Proceedings of International Conference of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005), Taipei, Taiwan (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, Pergamon, pp. 1–16. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Strijbos, J.-W., Kirschner, P., Martens, R. (eds.): What We Know about CSCL... and Implementing it in Higher Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cakir, M., Xhafa, F., Zhou, N., Stahl, G.: Thread-based analysis of patterns of collaborative interaction in chat. In: Proceedings of international conference on AI in Education (AI-Ed 2005), Amsterdam, Netherlands,Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duranti, A.: Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., Zemel, A.: The Video Analyst’s Manifesto (or The Implications of Garfinkel’s Policies for the Development of a Program of Video Analytic Research within the Learning Sciences). In: Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., Derry, S. (eds.) Video Research in the Learning Sciences (2005), Available at

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerry Stahl
    • 1
  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations