Learning Within the BDI Framework: An Empirical Analysis

  • Toan Phung
  • Michael Winikoff
  • Lin Padgham
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3683)

Abstract

One of the limitations of the BDI (Belief-Desire-Intention) model is the lack of any explicit mechanisms within the architecture to be able to learn. In particular, BDI agents do not possess the ability to adapt based on past experience. This is important in dynamic environments since they can change, causing methods for achieving goals that worked well previously to become inefficient or ineffective. We present a model in which learning can be utilised by a BDI agent and verify this model experimentally using two learning algorithms.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jennings, N.R.: An Agent-based Approach for Building Complex Software Systems. Communications of the ACM 44(4), 35–41 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction To MultiAgent Systems, 1st edn. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bratman, M.E.: Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason, 1st edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI-Agents: From Theory to Practice. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muggleton, S.: Inductive Logic Programming, 1st edn. Academic Press, London (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ng, K.S.: Alkemy: A Learning System Based on an Expressive Knowledge Representation (2004), Available from http://users.rsise.anu.edu.au/~kee/Alkemy/
  7. 7.
    Laird, J.E., Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.: SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 3, 1–64 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olivia, C., Chang, C.F., Enguix, C.F., Ghose, A.K.: Case-Based BDI Agents: An Effective Approach for Intelligent Search on the World Wide Web. In: AAAI Spring Symposium (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alonso, E., Kudenko, D.: Logic-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Conflict Simulations. In: d’Inverno, M., Luck, M., Fisher, M., Preist, C. (eds.) UKMAS Workshops 1996-2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2403, p. 59. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veloso, M., Carbonell, J., Perez, A., Borrajo, D., Fink, E., Blythe, J.: Integrating Planning and Learning: The PRODIGY Architecture. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 7(1) (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toan Phung
    • 1
  • Michael Winikoff
    • 1
  • Lin Padgham
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and ITRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations