Advertisement

The Good Symbiont

  • Chrisantha Fernando
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3630)

Abstract

A self-reproducing cycle has the fundamental organization, \(A+X \longrightarrow 2A\), and is autocatalytic, i.e. the products catalyze the formation of the products. The rate of increase of A is proportional to A, i.e. exponential. Asexual living entities often grow exponentially when resources are abundant, and decay exponentially when resources are scarce, according to autocatalytic kinetics. If two previously independently replicating autocatalytic entities can form a physical union that is still capable of autocatalysis but with a reduced decay rate, then the symbiosis can be viable in an environment in which resources have been depleted, even if the symbiont has a lower growth rate than either of its component particles. A good symbiont possesses the following features: i. low steric hindrance between components, ii. policing of defection or cheating by symbiont components. iii. low decay rate back to components. iv. absence of emergence of active sites susceptible to decay reactions. v. high rate of the final reproductive step. Failure to form stable symbiosis can result from deficits in any of these features, and is a problem central to the origin of both metabolism and template replication.

Keywords

Forward Rate Resource Concentration Decay Reaction Food Molecule Autocatalytic System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    King, G.A.M.: Autocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 7, 297–316 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    King, G.A.M.: Recycling, Reproduction and Lifes Origins. Biosystems 15, 89–97 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    King, G.A.M.: Symbiosis and the Origin of Life. Origins Life 8, 39–53 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ganti, T.: The Principles of Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ganti, T.: Chemoton Theory Vol I and II. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maynard-Smith, J., Szathmary, E.: The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kauffman, S.: Autocatalytic Sets of Proteins. J. Theoret. Bio. 119, 1–24 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farmer, J.D., Kauffman, S.A., Norman, H.: Packard Autocatalytic replication Polymers. Physica D 22, 50–67 (1986)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stadler, B.M.R., Stadler, P.F.: Molecular Replicator Dynamics Adv. Complex Systems 6, 47–77 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eigen, M., Schuster, P.: The Hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization. Springer, Berlin (1979)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Richard, E.: Michod Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breslow, R.: Tetrahedron. Letters 21, 22–26 (1959)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Decker, P., Schwoer, H., Pohlmann, R.: Bioids. Journal of Chromatography 224, 281–291 (1982)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wachterschauser, G.: Microbiol. Rev. 52, 452–484 (1988)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, E., Morowitz, H.J.: Universality in Intermediary Metabolism. PNAS 101(36), 13168–13173 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mossel, E., Steel, M.: Random Biochemical Networks: the probability of self-sustaining autocatalysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taming Combinatorial Explosion. PNAS 97(14), 7678–7680 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Szathmary, E.: The Evolution of Replicators. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B. Biol Sci. 29(355), 1669–1676 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Szathmary, E., Santos, M., Fernando, C.: Evolutionary Potential and Requirements for Minimal Protocells Topics in Chemistry (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fontana, W., Buss, L.W.: The Arrival of the Fittest: Toward a Theory of Biological Organization. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 56, 1–64 (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Margulis, L.: Symbiosis in Cell Evolution, 2nd edn. Freeman, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lovelock, J.E.: Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chrisantha Fernando
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Informatics, Center for Computational Neuroscience and RoboticsUniversity of SussexFalmer, BrightonUK

Personalised recommendations