Advertisement

Using Ontology to Establish Social Context and Support Social Reasoning

  • Edward Chao-Chun Kao
  • Paul Hsueh-Min Chang
  • Yu-Hung Chien
  • Von-Wun Soo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3661)

Abstract

Believable agents are required to express human-like characteristics. While most recent research focus on graphics and plan execution, few concentrate on the issue of flexible interactions by reasoning about social relations. This paper integrates the idea of social constraints with social ontology to provide a machine readable framework as a standard model which can support social reasoning for generic BDI agents. A scenario is illustrated to show how social reasoning can be attained even in different social context.

Keywords

Social Relation Multiagent System Description Logic Social Model Plan Execution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Artikis, A., Pitt, J., Sergot, M.J.: Animated specifications of computational societies. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, pp. 1053–1061 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates, J.: The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM 37(7), 122–125 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bratman, M.E., Israel, D.E., Pollack, M.E.: Plans and Resource-bounded Practical Reasoning. Computational Intelligence 4(4), 349–355 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carroll, J.J., Dickinson, I., Dollin, C., Reynolds, D., Seaborne, A., Wilkinson, K.: Jena: Implementing the Semantic Web Recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 74–83. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carley, K.M., Fridsma, D., Casman, E., Altman, N., Chang, J., Kaminsky, B., Nave, D., Yahja, A.: BioWar: scalable multi-agent social and epidemiological simulation of bioterrorism events. In: Proceedings of North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science (NAACSOS) Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castelfranchi, C.: Commitments: from individual intentions to groups and organizations. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, ICMAS (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Mead, S.: Characters in search of an author: AI-based virtual storytelling. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Virtual Storytelling, pp. 145–154. Springer, Avignon (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cavedon, L., Sonenberg, L.: On social commitment, roles and preferred goals. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (ICMAS), July 3-7, pp. 80–87. IEEE Computer Society, Paris (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang, P.H.-M., Chen, K.-T., Chien, Y.-H., Kao, E., Soo, V.-W.: From Reality to Mind: A Cognitive Middle Layer of Environment Concepts for Believable Agents. In: Weyns, D., Van Dyke Parunak, H., Michel, F. (eds.) E4MAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3374, pp. 57–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Nonmonotonic Commitment Machines. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Agent Communication Languages and Conversation Policies (ACL), Melbourne (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press, London (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Georgeff, M.P., Pell, B., Pollack, M.E., Tambe, M., Wooldridge, M.: The Belief-Desire-Intention model of agency. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents V, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL), July 4-7, pp. 1–10. Springer, Paris (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gratch, J.: Socially situated planning. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Socially Intelligent Agents: The Human in the Loop, North Falmouth, MA (November 2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knublauch, H., Musen, M.A., Rector, A.L.: Editing Description Logic Ontologies with Prot´eg´e OWL Plugin. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Workshop on Description Logics, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marsella, S., Gratch, J.: Modeling coping behavior in virtual humans: don’t worry, be happy. In: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2003)., July 14-18, pp. 313–320. ACM, Melbourne (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marsella, S., Johnson, W.L., LaBore, C.: Interactive Pedagogical Drama for Health Interventions. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Australia (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mateas, M.: An Oz-centric review of interactive drama and believable agents. In: Artificial Intelligence Today, pp. 297–328. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Molyneux, P.: Postmortem: Lionhead Studios’ Black & White, June 2001. Game Developer Magazine (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinnes, D.L. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/
  20. 20.
    Singh, M.P.: On the Commitments and Precommitments of Limited Agents. In: IJCAI Workshop on Theoretical and Practical Design of Rational Agents, Sydney, Australia (1991)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singh, M.P.: An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: toward a unification of normative concepts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 97–113 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Chao-Chun Kao
    • 1
  • Paul Hsueh-Min Chang
    • 2
  • Yu-Hung Chien
    • 2
  • Von-Wun Soo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.AI laboratoryInstitute of Information and System Applications 
  2. 2.AI laboratory, Department of Computer ScienceNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  3. 3.AI laboratory, Department of Computer ScienceNational University of KaohsiungKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations