Training Agents: An Architecture for Reusability

  • Gonzalo Mendez
  • Angelica de Antonio
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3661)

Abstract

During the last years, Intelligent Virtual Environments for Training have become a quite popular application of computer science to education. These systems involve very different technologies, ranging from computer graphics to artificial intelligence. However, little attention has been paid to software engineering issues, and most of these systems are developed in an ad-hoc way that does not allow the reuse of their components or even an easy modification of the application. We describe an agent-based software architecture that is intended to be easily extended and modified. Also, some experiments to test the suitability of the architecture are shown.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lester, J.C., Stone, B.A.: Increasing believability in animated pedagogical agents. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 16–21. ACM Press, New York (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lester, J.C., Voerman, J.L., Towns, S.G., Callaway, C.B.: Deictic believability: Coordinating gesture, locomotion, and speech in lifelike pedagogical agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13, 383–414 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rickel, J., Johnson, W.L.: Animated agents for procedural training in virtual reality: Perception, cognition, and motor control. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13, 343–382 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rickel, J., Johnson, W.L.: Virtual humans for team training in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 578–585. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evers, M., Nijholt, A.: Jacob - an animated instruction agent for virtual reality. In: Tan, T., Shi, Y., Gao, W. (eds.) ICMI 2000. LNCS, vol. 1948, pp. 526–532. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mendez, G., Rickel, J., de Antonio, A.: Steve meets jack: the integration of an intelligent tutor and a virtual environment with planning capabilities. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 325–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mendez, G., Herrero, P., de Antonio, A.: Intelligent virtual environments for training in nuclear power plants. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2004), Porto, Portugal (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sleeman, D., Brown, J. (eds.): Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Academic Press, London (1982)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wenger, E.: Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Munro, A., Surmon, D., Johnson, M., Pizzini, Q., Walker, J.: An open architecture for simulation-centered tutors. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education. Open Learning Environments: New Compu-tational Technologies to Support Learning, Exploration and Collaboration (Proceedings of AIED 1999: 9th Con-ference on Artificial Intelligence in Education), Le Mans, France, pp. 360–367 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alpdemir, M., Zobel, R.: A component-based animation framework for devs-based simulation environments. In: Simulation: Past, Present and Future. 12th European Simulation Multiconference (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demyunck, K., Broeckhove, J., Arickx, F.: Real-time visualization of complex simulations using veplatform software. In: Simulation in Industry 1999. 11th European Simulation Symposium (ESS 1999), pp. 329–333 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Darken, R., Tonessen, C., Passarella, J.: The bridge between developers and virtual environments: a robust virtual environment system architecture. In: Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2409, pp. 234–240 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Developing multiagent systems: The gaia methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 12, 317–370 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fikes, R.E., Nilsson, N.J.: Strips: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2, 189–208 (1971)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nau, D., Au, T., Ilghami, O., Kuter, U., Murdock, W., Wu, D., Yaman, F.: Shop2: An htn planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 20, 379–404 (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerevini, A., Saetti, A., Serina, I.: Planning through stochastic local search and temporal action graphs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 20, 239–290 (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gonzalo Mendez
    • 1
  • Angelica de Antonio
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science SchoolTechnical University of MadridBoadilla del Monte (Madrid)Spain

Personalised recommendations