Advertisement

A Method for Determining Geometrical Distortion of Off-The-Shelf Wide-Angle Cameras

  • Helmut Zollner
  • Robert Sablatnig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3663)

Abstract

In this work we present a method for calibrating and removing nonlinear geometric distortion of an imaging device. The topic is of importance since most reasoning in projective geometry requires the projection to be strictly line preserving. The model of radial-symmetric pincushion or barrel distortions, is generally not sufficient to compensate for all non-linearities of the projection, this is true especially for wide-angle cameras. Therefore we applied a more complex parametric model to compensate for the non-central distortion effects. The only a-priori knowledge that is used is the straightness of some edges in the recorded image. In our experiments we could show that the method is applicable especially for off-the-self cameras with medium quality optics.

Keywords

Camera Calibration Geometrical Distortion Lens Distortion Canny Edge Detector Distortion Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chetverikov, D., Szabó, Z.: A Simple and Efficient Algorithm for Detection of High Curvature Points in Planar Curves. Technical report (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deriche, R., Vailant, R., Faugeras, O.: From Noisy Edge Points to 3d Reconstruction of a scene: A Robust Approach and its Uncertainty Analysis. In: Proc. of the 7th Scandinavian Conf. on Image Analysis, Alborg, Denmark, August 1991, pp. 225–232 (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Devernay, F., Faugeras, O.D.: Straight lines have to be straight. Machine Vision and Applications 13(1), 14–24 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farid, H., Popescu, A.C.: Blind Removal of Lens Distortions. Journal of the Optical Society of America 18(9), 2072–2078 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habib, A., Morgan, M.: Automatic Calibration of Low Cost digital cameras. SPIE Journal of Optical Engeneering 42(4), 948–955 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Micusik, B., Pajdla, T.: Using RANSAC for Omnidirectional Camera Model Fitting. In: Drbohlav, O. (ed.) Computer Vision - CVWW, Vatice, Czech Republic, February 2003. Czech Pattern Recognition Society (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pers, J., Kovacic, S.: Nonparametric, Model-Based Radial Lens Distortion Correcting Using Tilted Camera Assumption. In: Kropatsch, H., Wildenauer, W. (eds.) Computer Vision - CVWW, Bad Ausee, Austria, February 2002, pp. 286–295 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsai, R.Y.: A Versatile Camera Calibration Technique for High Accuracy 3D Machine Vision Metrology using Off-the-Shelf TV Cameras and Lenses. Technical Report RC 51342, IBM (October 1985)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weng, J., Cohen, P., Herniou, M.: Camera Calibration with Distortion Models and Accuracy Evaluation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14(10), 965–980 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Zollner
    • 1
  • Robert Sablatnig
    • 1
  1. 1.Pattern and Image Processing Group (PRIP)Techn. Univ. WienViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations