Extending UML 2 Activity Diagrams with Business Intelligence Objects

  • Veronika Stefanov
  • Beate List
  • Birgit Korherr
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3589)


Data Warehouse (DWH) information is accessed by business processes. Today, no conceptual models exist that make the relationship between the DWH and the business processes transparent. In this paper, we extend a business process modeling diagram, namely the UML 2 activity diagram with a UML profile, which allows to make this relationship explicit. The model is tested with example business processes.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), Specification BPMN 1.0 May 3 (2004),
  2. 2.
    Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U.: An Overview of Data Warehousing and OLAP Technology. ACM SIGMOD Record 26(1), 65–74 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, P.: The Entity-Relationship Model - Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1(1), 9–36 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Golfarelli, M., Maio, D., Rizzi, S.: Conceptual Design of Data Warehouses from E/R Schema. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 6-9, vol. 7, p. 334 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golfarelli, M., Rizzi, S., Cella, I.: Beyond Data Warehousing: What’s next in business intelligence? In: Proceedings 7th International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (DOLAP 2004), Washington DC (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hammer, M.: Beyond Reengineering - How the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives. Harper Collins Publishers, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inmon, W.H., Hackethorn, R.D.: Using the Data Warehouse. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., Scheer, A.-W.: Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage “Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK). In: Scheer (Hrsg), A.-W. (ed.) Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Heft 89, Saarbrücken (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kimball, R., Ross, M.: The Data Warehouse Toolkit: The Complete Guide to Dimensional Modeling, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luján-Mora, S., Trujillo, J., Song, I.: Extending UML for Multidimensional Modeling. In: Jézéquel, J.-M., Hussmann, H., Cook, S. (eds.) UML 2002. LNCS, vol. 2460, pp. 290–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Object Management Group, Inc.: UML 2.0 OCL Specification, (22/4/2005)
  12. 12.
    Object Management Group, Inc.: UML 2.0 Superstructure, (22/4/2005)
  13. 13.
    Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trujillo, J., Luján-Mora, S.: A UML Based Approach for Modeling ETL Processes in Data Warehouses. In: Song, I.-Y., Liddle, S.W., Ling, T.-W., Scheuermann, P. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2813, pp. 307–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronika Stefanov
    • 1
  • Beate List
    • 1
  • Birgit Korherr
    • 1
  1. 1.Women’s Postgraduate College for Internet Technologies, Institute of Software Technology and Interactive SystemsVienna University of Technology 

Personalised recommendations