A Social Semantics for Multi-agent Systems
As in human world many of our goals could not be achieved without interacting with other people, in case many agents are part of the same environment one agent should be aware that he is not alone and he cannot assume other agents sharing his own goals. Moreover, he may be required to interact with other agents and to reason about their mental state in order to find out potential friends to join with (or opponents to fight against). In this paper we focus on a language derived from logic programming which both supports the representation of mental states of agent communities and provides each agent with the capability of reasoning about other agents’ mental states and acting accordingly. The proposed semantics is shown to be translatable into stable model semantics of logic programs with aggregates.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Bratman, M.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
- 3.Bratman, M., Israel, D.J., Pollack, M.E.: Plans and Resource-Bounded Practical Reason. AI center technical note SRI-AI 425R, SRI International (1988)Google Scholar
- 4.Buccafurri, F., Caminiti, G.: A Social-Oriented Semantics for Multi-Agent Systems. Technical Report - TR Lab. Ing. Inf. 05/01, DIMET - University of Reggio Calabria (2005), Available from the authorsGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.: Rational interaction as the basis for communication. In: Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
- 7.Cost, R.S., Finin, T., Labrou, Y.: Coordinating Agents Using ACL Conversations. In: Coordination of Internet Agents: Models, Technologies, and Applications, pp. 183–196 (2001)Google Scholar
- 8.Dell’Armi, T., Faber, W., Ielpa, G., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G.: Aggregate Functions in Disjunctive Logic Programming: Semantics, Complexity, and Implementation in DLV. In: IJCAI 2003, Proc. of the 18th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 847–852 (2003)Google Scholar
- 9.Eiter, T., Faber, W., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G.: Declarative problem-solving in DLV. In: Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence, pp. 79–103. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
- 10.Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In: 5th Conf. on Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
- 13.Patil, R.S., Fikes, R.E., Patel-Schneider, P.F., McKay, D., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Neches, R.: The DARPA knowledge sharing effort: progress report. In: Principles of KR and Reasoning: Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)Google Scholar