A caterpillar is a tree in which all vertices of degree three or more lie on one path, called the backbone. We present a polynomial time algorithm that produces a linear arrangement of the vertices of a caterpillar with bandwidth at most O(log n/loglog n) times the local density of the caterpillar, where the local density is a well known lower bound on the bandwidth. This result is best possible in the sense that there are caterpillars whose bandwidth is larger than their local density by a factor of Ω(log n/loglog n). The previous best approximation ratio for the bandwidth of caterpillars was O(log n). We show that any further improvement in the approximation ratio would require using linear arrangements that do not respect the order of the vertices of the backbone. We also show how to obtain a (1 + ε) approximation for the bandwidth of caterpillars in time \(2^{\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n/\epsilon})}\). This result generalizes to trees, planar graphs, and any family of graphs with treewidth \(\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})\).


Integer Program Approximation Ratio Decomposition Tree Linear Arrangement Partial Assignment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Blache, G., Karpinski, M., Wirtgen, J.: On approximation intractability of the bandwidth problem. Technical report, University of Bonn (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chinn, P., Chvatálová, J., Dewdney, A., Gibbs, N.: The bandwidth problem for graphs and matrices - survey. Journal of Graph Theory 6(3), 223–254 (1982)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chung, F.R., Seymour, P.D.: Graphs with small bandwidth and cutwidth. Discrete Mathematics 75, 113–119 (1989)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dunagan, J., Vempala, S.: On euclidean embeddings and bandwidth minimization. In: Goemans, M.X., Jansen, K., Rolim, J.D.P., Trevisan, L. (eds.) RANDOM 2001 and APPROX 2001. LNCS, vol. 2129, pp. 229–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feige, U.: Approximating the bandwidth via volume respecting embeddings. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 60(3), 510–539 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feige, U.: Coping with the NP-hardness of the graph bandwidth problem. In: Halldórsson, M.M. (ed.) SWAT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1851, pp. 10–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Filmus, Y.: Master’s thesis, Weizmann Institute (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gupta: Improved bandwidth approximation for trees. In: Proceedings of the eleventh annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pp. 788–793 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haralambides, J., Makedon, F., Monien, B.: Bandwidth minimization: An approximation algorithm for caterpillars. Mathematical Systems Theory, 169–177 (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krauthgamer, R., Lee, J., Mendel, M., Naor, A.: Measured descent: A new embedding method for finite metrics. In: FOCS, pp. 434–443 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Monien, B.: The bandwidth minimization problem for caterpillars with hair length 3 is NP-complete. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 7(4), 505–512 (1986)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papadimitriou, C.: The NP-completeness of the bandwidth minimization problem. Computing 16, 263–270 (1976)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saxe, J.: Dynamic-programming algorithms for recognizing small-bandwidth graphs in polynomial time. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 1, 363–369 (1980)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Unger, W.: The complexity of the approximation of the bandwidth problem. In: FOCS 1998: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 82–91 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uriel Feige
    • 1
  • Kunal Talwar
    • 2
  1. 1.Weizmann Institute and Microsoft Research 
  2. 2.Microsoft Research 

Personalised recommendations