Advertisement

Configuration of Dynamic SME Supply Chains Based on Ontologies

  • Eva Blomqvist
  • Tatiana Levashova
  • Annika Öhgren
  • Kurt Sandkuhl
  • Alexander Smirnov
  • Vladimir Tarassov
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3593)

Abstract

Due to the increasing implementation of agile and networked manufacturing, supply chain has entered a new phase, virtual supply chain. The phase is characterized by the integration of activities, operations, and functions carried out at different and geographically distributed supply chain stages. The paper proposes an approach to the configuration of a network of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) being integrated into a supply chain. The SME supply chain configuration is based on a shared domain ontology for supply chain management, offering the configuration task as a function of supply chain management. Principles of the development of the shared ontology and possible ways of matching between enterprise and domain ontologies are considered.

Keywords

Supply Chain Supply Chain Management Domain Ontology Supplier Selection Task Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hieber, R., Alard, R.: Supply Chain Management - A Survey of Practices and Trends in Swiss Industry. In: Proc. IFIP WG 5.7 Working Conference, Tromsö, Norway (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sandkuhl, K., Smirnov, A., Henoch, B.: Towards Knowledge Logistics in Agile SME Networks - Technological and Organisational Concepts. In: Dolgui, A., Soldek, J., Zaikin, O. (eds.) Supply chain optimisation: product/process design, facility location and flow control, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht ISBN 1-4020-8081-6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Öhgren, A., Öhgren Sandkuhl, K.: Towards a Methodology for Ontology Development in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. In: Guimarães, N., Isaías, P. (eds.) Proc. of the IADIS International Conference on Applied Computing, Algarve, Portugal, vol. 1, pp. 369–376 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blomqvist, E., Öhgren, A., Sandkuhl, K., Levashova, T., Smirnov, A.: Formation of Enterprise Networks for Collaborative Engineering. Submitted to the CCE 2005 conference (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Staab, S., Schnurr, H.-P., Studer, R., Sure, Y.: Knowledge Processes and Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(1) (2001), Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 26—34, http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/~sst/Research/Publications/isystems-knowledgeprocess.pdf
  6. 6.
    Semantic Community Portals. SWAD-E European Project, HP Semantic Web Group (2004), http://www.hpl.hp.com/semweb/portal.htm
  7. 7.
    Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems. In: Proceedings of FOIS 1998, Trento, Italy, pp. 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pérez, A.G., Benjamins, V.R.: Overview of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse Components: Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods. In: Benjamins, V.R., Chandrasekaran, B., Gomez-Perez, A., Guarino, N., Uschold, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the IJCAI 1999 workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods (KRR5), Stockholm, Sweden (1999), http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-18/
  9. 9.
    On-To-Knowledge Methodology. On-To-Knowledge: Content-driven Knowledge Management Tools through Evolving Ontologies. Final Version, Deliverable 18 (2002), http://www.ontoknowledge.org/downl/del18.pdf
  10. 10.
    Smirnov, A., Pashkin, M., Chilov, N., Levashova, T., Haritatos, F.: Knowledge Source Network Configuration Approach to Knowledge Logistics. International Journal of General Systems 32(3), 251–269 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swartout, B., Patil, R., Knight, K., Russ, T.: Toward Distributed Use of Large-Scale Ontologies. In: Tenth Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop (KAW 1996), Banff, Canada (1996), http://www.isi.edu/isd/banff_paper/Banff_final_web/Banff_96_final_2.html
  12. 12.
    Levashova, T.V., Pashkin, M.P., Shilov, N.G., Smirnov, A.V.: Ontology Management. Journal of Computer and System Sciences International, Part II 42(5), 744–756 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chopra, S., Meindl, P.: Supply Chain Management. Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trent, R.J.: What Everyone Needs to Know about SCM. Supply Chain Management Review (March 2004), http://www.manufacturing.net/scm/index.asp?layout=rticle&articleID=CA409514
  15. 15.
    Fully Integrated, Scalable Supply Chain Management Solution. Solution Blueprints, IBM Business Consulting Services (2002), http://www.intel.com/business/bss/solutions/blueprints/pdf/sb_ibmbcs0252.pdf
  16. 16.
    Chopra, S., Dougan, D., Taylor, G.: B2B e-Commerce Opportunities. Supply Chain Management Review, 50–58 (May-June 2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Truong, T.H., Azadivar, F.: Simulation Based Optimization for Supply Chain Configuration Design. In: Chick, S., Sánchez, P.J., Ferrin, D., Morrice, D.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, December 7—10, vol. 2, pp. 1268–1275 (2003), http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/8912/28189/01261560.pdf
  18. 18.
    Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Evaluating Ontology-Mapping Tools: Requirements and Experience. In: Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology Tools at EKAW 2002, EON 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.P.: Ontology integration: How to perform the process. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGuinnes, D.L., Fikes, R., Rice, J., Wilder, S.: An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Breckenridge, pp. 483–493 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment. In: Proceedings of Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, pp. 450–455 (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stumme, G., Maedche, A.: FCA-Merge: Bottom-Up Merging of Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, USA, August 1-6, Morgan Kauffmann, San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: IF-Map: An Ontology-Mapping Method based on Information-Flow Theory. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S., Aberer, K. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics I. LNCS, vol. 2800, pp. 98–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., Haleny, A.: Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In: 11th International World Wide Web conference, Honolulu (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G., Kersten, M.: A Graph-Oriented Model for Articulation of Ontology Interdependencies. In: Zaniolo, C., Grust, T., Scholl, M.H., Lockemann, P.C. (eds.) EDBT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1777, p. 86. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ding, Y., Fensel, D., Klein, M., Omelayenko, B.: The Semantic Web: Yet Another Hip? Data and Knowledge Engineering 41(3), 205–227 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L., Studer, R., Volz, R.: Ontologies for Enterprise Knowledge Management. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26–33 (March/April 2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Blomqvist
    • 1
  • Tatiana Levashova
    • 2
  • Annika Öhgren
    • 1
  • Kurt Sandkuhl
    • 1
  • Alexander Smirnov
    • 2
  • Vladimir Tarassov
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering at Jönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and AutomationSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations