Advertisement

Fingerprint Quality Indices for Predicting Authentication Performance

  • Yi Chen
  • Sarat C. Dass
  • Anil K. Jain
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3546)

Abstract

The performance of an automatic fingerprint authentication system relies heavily on the quality of the captured fingerprint images. In this paper, two new quality indices for fingerprint images are developed. The first index measures the energy concentration in the frequency domain as a global feature. The second index measures the spatial coherence in local regions. We present a novel framework for evaluating and comparing quality indices in terms of their capability of predicting the system performance at three different stages, namely, image enhancement, feature extraction and matching. Experimental results on the IBM-HURSLEY and FVC2002 DB3 databases demonstrate that the global index is better than the local index in the enhancement stage (correlation of 0.70 vs. 0.50) and comparative in the feature extraction stage (correlation of 0.70 vs. 0.71). Both quality indices are effective in predicting the matching performance, and by applying a quality-based weighting scheme in the matching algorithm, the overall matching performance can be improved; a decrease of 1.94% in EER is observed on the FVC2002 DB3 database.

Keywords

Quality Index Authentication System Fingerprint Image Matching Performance Enhancement Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tabassi, E., Wilson, C., Watson, C.: Fingerprint Image Quality. NIST research report NISTIR7151 (August 2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bolle, R., et al.: System and methods for determing the quality of fingerprint images. United Sates patent number US596356 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hong, L., Wan, Y., Jain, A.: Fingerprint image enhancement: algorithms and performance evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 777–789 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shen, L., Kot, A., Koo, W.: Quality measures of fingerprint images. In: Audio- and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ratha, N., Bolle, R.: Fingerprint image quality estimation. IBM computer science research report RC21622 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lim, E., Jiang, X., Yau, W.: Fingerprint quality and validity analysis. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 1, 469–472 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosenfeld, A., Kak, A.: Digital Picture Processing. Academic Press, London (1982)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hong, L., Jain, A., Pankanti, S., Bolle, R.: Fingerprint Enhancement. In: IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 202–207 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hong, L., Wan, Y., Jain, A.: Fingerprint Image Enhancement: Algorithms and Performance Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 20(8), 777–789 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jain, A., Hong, L., Bolle, R.: On-line fingerprint verification. IEEE Trasactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19(4), 302–314 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maltoni, D., Cappelli, R., Wayman, J., Jain, A.: FVC 2002: Second Fingerprint Verification Competition. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 3, pp. 811–814 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jain, A., Prabhakar, S., Chen, S.: Combining Multiple Matchers for a High Security Fingerprint Verification System. Pattern Recognition Letters 20, 1371–1379 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Chen
    • 1
  • Sarat C. Dass
    • 2
  • Anil K. Jain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing

Personalised recommendations