Using Similarity to Infer Meta-cognitive Behaviors During Analogical Problem Solving

  • Kasia Muldner
  • Cristina Conati
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3538)

Abstract

We present a computational framework designed to provide adaptive support aimed at triggering learning from problem-solving activities in the presence of worked-out examples. The key to the framework’s ability to provide this support is a user model that exploits a novel classification of similarity to infer the impact of a particular example on a given student’s metacognitive behaviors and subsequent learning.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aleven, V., Ashley, K.D.: Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples: Empirical evaluation of an intelligent learning environment. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education, Kobe, Japan (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J.R.: Rules of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkinson, R., Derry, S., Renkl, A., Wortham, D.: Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research. Review of Educational Research 70(2), 181–214 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., Glaser, R.: Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 13, 145–182 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R.: Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 5, 121–152 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chi, M.T.H., VanLehn, K.: The content of physics self-explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1, 69–105 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conati, C., Gertner, A., VanLehn, K.: Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling. Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12(4), 371–417 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conati, C., VanLehn, K.: Toward Computer-based Support of Meta-cognitive Skills: A Computational Framework to Coach Self-Explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 389–415 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murray, C., VanLehn, K.: DT Tutor: A decision-theoretic dynamic approach for optimal selection of tutorial actions. In: 5’th Int. Conf. on ITS, Montreal, Canada (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Novick, L.R.: Analogical transfer, problem similarity and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14, 510–520 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quilici, J., Mayer, R.: Role of Examples in How students Learn to Categorize Statistics Word Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology 88(1), 144–161 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reed, S.K.: A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 13, 124–139 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reed, S.K., Dempster, A., Ettinger, M.: Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 11, 106–125 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sweller, J., Cooper, G.A.: The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction 2(1), 59–89 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    VanLehn, K.: Analogy Events: How Examples are Used During Problem Solving. Cognitive Science 22(3), 347–388 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    VanLehn, K.: Rule-Learning Events in the Acquisition of a Complex Skill: An Evaluation of Cascade. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 8(1), 71–125 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    VanLehn, K., Jones, R.M.: Better learners use analogical problem solving sparingly. In: Utgoff, P.E. (ed.) Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference, pp. 338–345. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weber, G.: Individual Selection of Examples in an Intelligent Learning Environment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 7(1), 3–33 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kasia Muldner
    • 1
  • Cristina Conati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations