Advertisement

Open-Source Publishing of Medical Knowledge for Creation of Computer-Interpretable Guidelines

  • Mor Peleg
  • Rory Steele
  • Richard Thomson
  • Vivek Patkar
  • Tony Rose
  • John Fox
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3581)

Abstract

Guidelines, care pathways, and other representations of high quality clinical practice can now be formalized and distributed in executable form. It is widely recognized that the ability to apply knowledge at the point of care creates an opportunity to influence clinicians’ behavior, encouraging compliance with evidence-based standards and improving care quality. The ability to share formal knowledge may also enable the medical community to build on work done by others and reduce content development costs. We propose a Medical Knowledge Repository and content model that supports assembly of components into new applications. Some types of resources that may be included in such a repository are defined, and a frame-based representation for indexing and structuring the components is described. The domain of breast cancer is used as a case study for demonstrating the feasibility of the approach.

Keywords

Semantic Type Knowledge Component Common Object Request Broker Architecture Guideline Developer Breast Cancer Risk Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shea, S., DuMouchel, W., Bahamonde, L.: A Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials to Evaluate Computer-based Clinical Reminder Systems for Preventative Care in the Ambulatory Setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 3(6), 399–409 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peleg, M., Boxwala, A.A., Tu, S., Zeng, Q., Ogunyemi, O., Wang, D., et al.: The InterMed Approach to Sharable Computer-interpretable Guidelines:A Review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11(1), 1–10 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peleg, M., Tu, S.W., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R.A., et al.: Comparing Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-Study Approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10(1), 52–68 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siegel, J.: CORBA 3 Fundamentals and Programming. 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Champion, M., Ferris, C., Newcomer, E., Orchard, D. (eds.): W3C. Web Services Architecture. W3C, November 14 (2002), http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-arch-20021114/
  6. 6.
    Domingue, J., Cabral, L., Hakimpour, F., Sell, D., Motta, E.: III: A Platform and Infrastructure for Creating WSMO-based Semantic Web Services. In: Proc. Workshop on WSMO Implementations 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clercq, P.A., Blom, J.A., Korsten, H.H., Hasman, A.: Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support. Artif Intell Med 31(1), 1–27 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fox, J., Alabassi, A., Black, E., Hurt, C., Rose, T.: Modelling Clinical Goals: a Corpus of Example and a Tentative Ontology. In: Proc. Symp. Comput. Guidelines and Protocols, pp. 31–45 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fox, J., Alabassi, A., Patkar, V., Rose, T., Black, E.: An ontological approach to modelling tasks and goals. Comput. in Biol & Med. (2004) (in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernstam, E., Ash, N., Peleg, M., Tu, S., Boxwala, A.A., Mork, P., et al.: Guideline classification to assist modeling, authoring, implementation and retrieval. In: Proc. AMIA Symp. 2000, pp. 66–70 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mor Peleg
    • 1
  • Rory Steele
    • 2
  • Richard Thomson
    • 2
    • 3
  • Vivek Patkar
    • 2
  • Tony Rose
    • 2
  • John Fox
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Management Information SystemsUniversity of HaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Advanced Computation LaboratoryCancer Research UKLondonUK
  3. 3.OpenClinical 

Personalised recommendations