Influential Nodes in a Diffusion Model for Social Networks

  • David Kempe
  • Jon Kleinberg
  • Éva Tardos
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3580)


We study the problem of maximizing the expected spread of an innovation or behavior within a social network, in the presence of “word-of-mouth” referral. Our work builds on the observation that individuals’ decisions to purchase a product or adopt an innovation are strongly influenced by recommendations from their friends and acquaintances. Understanding and leveraging this influence may thus lead to a much larger spread of the innovation than the traditional view of marketing to individuals in isolation.

In this paper, we define a natural and general model of influence propagation that we term the decreasing cascade model, generalizing models used in the sociology and economics communities. In this model, as in related ones, a behavior spreads in a cascading fashion according to a probabilistic rule, beginning with a set of initially “active” nodes. We study the target set selection problem: we wish to choose a set of individuals to target for initial activation, such that the cascade beginning with this active set is as large as possible in expectation. We show that in the decreasing cascade model, a natural greedy algorithm is a 1-1/ e-ε approximation for selecting a target set of size k.


Greedy Algorithm Success Probability Active Node Threshold Model Cascade Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Brown, J., Reinegen, P.: Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 14, 350–362 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Domingos, P., Richardson, M.: Mining the network value of customers. In: Proc. 7th Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 57–66 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Muller, E.: Using complex systems analysis to advance marketing theory development: Modeling heterogeneity effects on new product growth through stochastic cellular automata. Academy of Marketing Science Review (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Muller, E.: Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters 12, 211–223 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richardson, M., Domingos, P.: Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In: Proc. 8th Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 61–70 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E.: Maximizing the spread of influence in a social network. In: Proc. 9th Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 137–146 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogers, E.: Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. Free Press (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valente, T.: Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Hampton Press (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Granovetter, M.: Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83, 1420–1443 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berger, E.: Dynamic monopolies of constant size. Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B 83, 191–200 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morris, S.: Contagion. Review of Economic Studies 67, 57–78 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peleg, D.: Local majority voting, small coalitions, and controlling monopolies in graphs: A review. In: 3rd Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication, pp. 170–179 (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cornuejols, G., Fisher, M., Nemhauser, G.: Location of bank accounts to optimize float. Management Science 23, 789–810 (1977)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nemhauser, G., Wolsey, L., Fisher, M.: An analysis of the approximations for maximizing submodular set functions. Mathematical Programming 14, 265–294 (1978)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Macy, M.: Chains of cooperation: Threshold effects in collective action. American Sociological Review 56, 730–747 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Macy, M., Willer, R.: From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology 28, 143–166 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schelling, T.: Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Norton (1978)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Watts, D.: A simple model of fads and cascading failures. Technical Report 00-12-062, Santa Fe Institute Working Paper (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Young, H.P.: Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Young, H.P.: The diffusion of innovations in social networks. Technical Report 02-14-018, Santa Fe Institute Working Paper (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Kempe
    • 1
  • Jon Kleinberg
    • 2
  • Éva Tardos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Southern California 
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceCornell University 

Personalised recommendations