Advertisement

Up-to Techniques for Weak Bisimulation

  • Damien Pous
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3580)

Abstract

Up-to techniques have been introduced to enhance the bisimulation proof method for establishing bisimilarity results. While up-to techniques for strong bisimilarity are well understood, in the weak case they come as a collection of unrelated results, and lack a unified presentation. We propose a uniform and modular theory of up-to techniques for weak bisimulation that captures existing proof technology and introduces new techniques. Some proofs rely on non trivial – and new – commutation results based on termination guarantees.

Keywords

Monotonic Function Visible Action Label Transition System Proof Technique Control Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arun-Kumar, S., Hennessy, M.: An efficiency preorder for processes. Acta Informatica 29(9), 737–760 (1992)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bezem, M., Klop, J.W., van Oostrom, V.: Diagram techniques for confluence. Information and Computation 141(2), 172–204 (1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fournet, C.: The Join-Calculus: a Calculus for Distributed Mobile Programming. PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirschkoff, D., Pous, D., Sangiorgi, D.: An Efficient Abstract Machine for Safe Ambients. Technical Report 2004–63, LIP – ENS Lyon, 2004. An extended abstract appeared in the proceedings of COORDINATION 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pous, D.: Up-to Techniques for Weak Bisimulation. Technical Report 2005–16, LIP – ENS Lyon (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pous, D.: Web appendix of this paper (2005), Available at http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/damien.pous/upto
  7. 7.
    INRIA projet Logical. The Coq proof assistant, http://coq.inria.fr/
  8. 8.
    Sangiorgi, D.: On the Bisimulation Proof Method. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 8, 447–479 (1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sangiorgi, D., Milner, R.: The problem of “Weak Bisimulation up to”. In: Cleaveland, W.R. (ed.) CONCUR 1992. LNCS, vol. 630, pp. 32–46. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    TeReSe. Term Rewriting Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damien Pous
    • 1
  1. 1.ENS Lyon 

Personalised recommendations