Looking Beyond Computer Applications: Investigating Rich Structures

  • Claus Atzenbeck
  • Peter J. Nürnberg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3511)


Spatial structure supporting applications offer an abstract level of what can be found in the real world. However, in many systems, objects are aligned straight, rotation is not possible, they can be resized easily and can hold more text than is visible on the screen. Paper and structures created with paper seem to be more limited: Straight alignment is not possible without spending much time; paper can hardly be resized without damaging it; and piles may fall down if they become too tall. However, a closer look shows that paper structures offer much more attributes and dependencies than any current spatial structure supporting application. In this article, we compare paper structures to a selection of computer applications. We argue that the observed small additions with paper carry information which improves finding and organizing.


Structural Computing Paper Structure Rich Structure Size Document Collection Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ashdown, M.S.D.: Personal projected displays. Technical Report 585, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, 3 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bederson, B.B., Meyer, J., Good, L.: Jazz: an extensible zoomable user interface graphics toolkit in java. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 171–180. ACM Press, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernstein, M.: Collage, composites, construction. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 122–123. ACM Press, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bush, V.: As we think. The Atlantic Monthly 176(1), 101–108 (1945)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cole, I.: Human aspects of office filing: implications for the electronic office. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, pp. 59–63 (1982)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Combs, T.T.A., Bederson, B.B.: Does zooming improve image browsing? In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 130–137. ACM Press, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conklin, J., Begeman, M.L.: Gibis: a hypertext tool for team design deliberation. In: Proceeding of the ACM Conference on Hypertext, pp. 247–251. ACM Press, New York (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conklin, J., Begeman, M.L.: gibis: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. In: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 140–152. ACM Press, New York (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eastgate Systems. TinderboxTM for Macintosh v. 2.2. User’s Manual & Reference. Eastgate Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Engelbart, D.C.: Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework. Summary Report AFOSR-3233, Standford Research Institute, 10 (1962)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frohlich, D., Perry, M.: The paperful office paradox. Technical Report HPL-94-20, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, 3 (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupton, K., Shipman, F.: Visual Knowledge Builder version 0.70. The user’s manual. Center for the Study of Digital Libraries, Texas A&M University (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halasz, F., Schwartz, M.: The dexter hypertext reference model. Communications of the ACM 37(2), 30–39 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hornbæk, K., Bederson, B.B., Plaisant, C.: Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 9(4), 362–389 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan, F.: A survey of note-taking practices. Technical Report HPL-93-107, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, 12 (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kidd, A.: The marks are on the knowledge worker. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 186–191. ACM Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lansdale, M.: The psychology of personal information management. Applied Ergonomics 19(3), 55–66 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lyon, K., Nürnberg, P.J.: Applying information visualisation techniques to spatial hypertext tools. In: Wiil, U.K. (ed.) MIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3511, pp. 85–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Malone, T.W.: How do people organize their desks? implications for the design of office information systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 99–112 (1983)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marshall, C.C., Halasz, F.G., Rogers, R.A., Janssen, W.C.: Aquanet: a hypertext tool to hold your knowledge in place. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Conference on Hypertext, pp. 261–275. ACM Press, New York (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marshall, C.C., Shipman, F.M., Coombs, J.H.: Viki: spatial hypertext supporting emergent structure. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM European Conference on Hypermedia Technology, pp. 13–23. ACM Press, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nelson, T.H.: Complex information processing: a file structure for the complex, the changing and the indeterminate. In: Proceedings of the 1965 20th National Conference, pp. 84–100. ACM Press, New York (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nürnberg, P.J., Wiil, U.K., Hicks, D.: A grand unified theory for structural computing. In: Hicks, D. (ed.) MIS 2003. LNCS, vol. 3002, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Omni Group. OmniGraffle 3 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reich, S.: Content engineering: Bridging the gap between content creation and consumption. In: Wiil, U.K. (ed.) MIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3511, pp. 206–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shipman, F., Airhart, R., Hsieh, H., Maloor, P., Moore, J.M., Shah, D.: Visual and spatial communication and task organization using the visual knowledge builder. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 260–269. ACM Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Simpson, R., Renear, A., Mylonas, E., van Dam, A.: 50 years after as we may think: the brown/mit vannevar bush symposium. Interactions 3(2), 47–67 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsichritzis, D.: Form management. Communications of the ACM 25(7), 453–478 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ulbrich, A., Tochtermann, K.: Applying structural computing paradigms to domain analysis. In: Wiil, U.K. (ed.) MIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3511, pp. 192–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vaitis, M., Tzagarakis, M.M., Grivas, K., Chrysochoos, E.: Some notes on behavior in structural computing. In: Hicks, D. (ed.) MIS 2003. LNCS, vol. 3002, pp. 143–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Van Dyke Parunak, H.: Don’t link me in: set based hypermedia for taxonomic reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Conference on Hypertext, pp. 233–242. ACM Press, New York (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Whittaker, S., Hirschberg, J.: The character, value, and management of personal paper archives. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 8(2), 150–170 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wiil, U.K., Hicks, D., Nürnberg, P.J.: An agenda for structural computing research. In: Wiil, U.K. (ed.) MIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3511, pp. 94–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claus Atzenbeck
    • 1
  • Peter J. Nürnberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Software and Media TechnologyAalborg University EsbjergEsbjergDenmark

Personalised recommendations