Managing Ontological Complexity: A Case Study

  • Peter J. Nürnberg
  • Svetlana Krestova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3511)

Abstract

Ontologies represent a widely accepted method for modelling structured knowledge spaces. Ontologies are particularly useful in modelling corporate or collective knowledge spaces. As such, they provide a vehicle for codifying the collected experience, best practices or common agreement of communities. Nonetheless, in practice, such knowledge must be tailored by practitioners to meet the challenges at hand. While tools for the construction of ontologies abound, we have found that many users are still reliant on human judgement instead of computational support when ontological knowledge must be tailored, personalized, customized and/or applied. In this paper, we examine some of the circumstances surrounding this state of affairs, and contemplate possible roles for computational support in these undertakings. We do this through based on our experiences with the Multilingual Dictionary of Lexicographical Terms (MDLT), a prototype of a linguistic database.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kang, D., Xu, B., Lu, J., Wang, P., Li, Y.: Extracting sub-ontology from multiple ontologies. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Corsaro, A. (eds.) OTM-WS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3292, pp. 731–740. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Leenheer, P.: Revising and managing multiple ontology versions in a possible worlds setting. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Corsaro, A. (eds.) OTM-WS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3292, pp. 798–809. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergenholtz, H., Cantell, I., Fjeld, R., Gundersen, D., Jónsson, S., Mikkelsen, H.K., Svénsen, B.: Nordisk Leksikografisk Ordbok. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burkhanov, I.: Lexicography: A Dictionary of Basic Terminology. Wydawnictwo Wyzszej Szkoly Pedagogicznej, Rzeszów (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hartmann, R.R.K. (ed.): Lexicography. Principles and Practice. Academic Press, London (1983)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hartmann, R.R.K., James, G.: Dictionary of Lexicography. Routledge, London (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kipfer, B.A.: Wordbook on Lexicography: A Course for Dictionary Users with a Glossary of English Lexicographical Terms. University of Exeter (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alani, H., Kim, S., Millard, D.E., Weal, M.J., Hall, W., Lewis, P.H., Shadbolt, N.R.: Automatic ontology-based knowledge extraction and tailored biography generation from the web. Technical Report Equator-02-049, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mena, E., Illarramendi, A., Goñi, A.: Automatic ontology construction for a multiagent-based software gathering service. In: Klusch, M., Kerschberg, L. (eds.) CIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1860, pp. 232–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiil, U.K.: Lessons learned with the Construct development environment. In: Nürnberg, P.J. (ed.) MIS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2641, pp. 9–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Nürnberg
    • 1
  • Svetlana Krestova
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Software and Media TechnologyAalborg University EsbjergEsbjergDenmark

Personalised recommendations