Advertisement

Processes, Workflows, Web Service Flows: A Reconstruction

  • Stefan Jablonski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3551)

Abstract

The last decade was heavily focusing on process-oriented approaches for application integration. It started with the advent of workflow management technology at the beginning of the nineties. This development has been continued with the definition of flow concepts for Web services. In this article, we discuss the purpose and advantages of process-oriented concepts for application integration. Therefore, workflow technology and Web service flows are briefly introduced. Then we assess both technologies with respect to their role in application integration. Especially, we will reconstruct the fundamental differences between workflows and Web services.

Keywords

Software Agent Business Process Execution Language Application Integration Enterprise Application Integration UDDI Registry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., Machiraju, V.: Web Services, Concepts, Architectures, and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) for Web Services Version 1.1 (2003), http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-bpel/
  3. [3]
    Business Process Modeling Language (BPML) (2004), http://www.bpmi.org/bpml.esp
  4. [4]
    Carnegie Mellon, Software Engineering Institute: Message-Oriented,Middleware, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/momt.html 2004/10/28
  5. [5]
    Cummins, F.A.: Enterprise Integration with Workflow Management, Presentation on (November 1,1999), http://www.bijonline.com 2004/10/14
  6. [6]
    Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2004)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation. HarperBusiness (2004) Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Jablonski, S., Bussler, C.: Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture and Implementation. International Thomson Publishing (1996) Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Jablonski, S., Bussler, C.: Process Modeling and Execution in Workflow Management Systems. In: Proceedings 3rd International Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, Orlando, FL (December 1993)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jablonski, S., Petrov, I., Meiler, C., Mayer, U.: Guide to Web Application and Plattform Architectures. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Jeckle, M.: Techniken der XML-Familie zur Systemintegration. IT-Information Technology, Heft 4 (2004) Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Linthicum, D.S.: Enterprise Application Integration. Addison Wesley, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Linthicum, D.S.: Next Generation Application Integration, From Simple Information to Web Services. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    ProDatO: i>PM, integrated ProcessManager. White Paper,http://www.prodato.de 2004/10/28
  15. [15]
    The Apache Cocoon Project (2004), http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/
  16. [16]
    WS Choreography Model Overview, W3C Working Draft (March 24, 2004) 2004/10/28 Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    W3C: Web Services Glossary, W3C Working Group Note (February 11, 2004) 2004/10/28 Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    WfMC: Terminology & Glossary. Document Number WFMC-TC-1011, Document Status - Issue 3.0 (February 1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Jablonski
    • 1
  1. 1.Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-NurembergGermany

Personalised recommendations