Advertisement

A Framework for Classification of Change Approaches Based on a Comparison of Process Improvement Models

  • Otto Vinter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3547)

Abstract

In this paper we describe a framework for classifying possible change approaches according to the stage(s) in the life-cycle where the approach is most applicable. The life-cycle model of the framework is based on an analysis of a number of existing life-cycle models for change from three different domains. The focus of this framework is on the individual improvement project and the palette of available approaches to its project manager.

Keywords

Combine Model Change Project Separate Stage Change Approach Software Process Improvement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper, R.B., Zmud, R.W.: Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach. Management Science 36(2), 123–139 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davenport, T.H.: Process Innovation: Re-engineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hammer, M.: Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 104–112 (July-August 1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Organization for Standardization: Information Technology – Software process assessment – Part 1: Concepts and introductory guide. ISO/IEC TR 15504-1:1998(E) (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    International Organization for Standardization: Information Technology – Software process assessment – Part 7: Guide for use in process improvement. ISO/IEC TR 15504-7:1998(E) (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.T.C.: Conducting Business Process Change: Recommendations from a Study of 25 Leading Approaches. In: Grover, Kettinger (eds.) Process Think: Winning perspectives for Business Change in the Information Age. Idea Group Publishing (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kinnula, A.: Software Process Engineering Systems: Models and Industry Cases. Oulu University Press (2001), http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514265084/
  8. 8.
    Kinnula, A., Kinnula, M.: Comparing SPI Activity Cycles to SPI Program Models in Multisite Environment. In: Proceedings of the PROFES 2004 Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malhotra, Y.: Business Process Redesign: An Overview. IEEE Engineering Management Review 26(3) (1998) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McFeely, R.: IDEAL: A User’s Guide for Software Process Improvement. CMU/SEI-96-HB-001 (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muthu, S., Whitman, L., Cheragi, S.H.: Business Process Reengineering: A Consolidated Methodology. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering Theory, Applications and Practice (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paulk, M.C., Weber, C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B.: The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Software Engineering Institute: The IDEALSM Model: A Practical Guide for Improvement (1997), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/ideal/ideal.bridge.html
  14. 14.
    Software Engineering Institute: Improving Technology Adaptation Using INTRo. (2003), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/intro/documents/users-guide.doc
  15. 15.
    Somers, T.M., Nelson, K.: The Impact of Critical Success Factors across the Stages of Enterprise Resource Planning Implementations. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Somers, T.M., Nelson, K.: A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle. Information & Management 41 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stoica, M., Chawat, N., Shin, N.: An Investigation of the Methodologies of Business Process Reengineering. In: Proceedings of the ISECON 2003 Conference, EDSIG (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vinter, O., Pries-Heje, J. (eds.): På vej mod at blive bedre til at blive bedre – Talent@IT projektet. DELTA Report D-266, Hørsholm, Denmark (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Otto Vinter
    • 1
  1. 1.DELTA, IT ProcessesHørsholmDenmark

Personalised recommendations