Smoothed Analysis of Integer Programming

  • Heiko Röglin
  • Berthold Vöcking
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3509)

Abstract

We present a probabilistic analysis of integer linear programs (ILPs). More specifically, we study ILPs in a so-called smoothed analysis in which it is assumed that first an adversary specifies the coefficients of an integer program and then (some of) these coefficients are randomly perturbed, e.g., using a Gaussian or a uniform distribution with small standard deviation. In this probabilistic model, we investigate structural properties of ILPs and apply them to the analysis of algorithms. For example, we prove a lower bound on the slack of the optimal solution. As a result of our analysis, we are able to specify the smoothed complexity of classes of ILPs in terms of their worst case complexity. For example, we obtain polynomial smoothed complexity for packing and covering problems with any fixed number of constraints. Previous results of this kind were restricted to the case of binary programs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Banderier, C., Beier, R., Mehlhorn, K.: Smoothed Analysis of Three Combinatorial Problems. In: Proc. 28th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS-2003), vol. 97, pp. 198–207 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beier, R., Vöcking, B.: An Experimental Study of Random Knapsack Problems. In: Proc. of the 12th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA-2004), pp. 616–627 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beier, R., Vöcking, B.: Probabilistic Analysis of Knapsack Core Algorithms. In: Proc. of the 15th Annual Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA-2004), New Orleans, USA, pp. 468–477 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beier, R., Vöcking, B.: Random Knapsack in Expected Polynomial Time. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 69(3), 306–329 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beier, R., Vöcking, B.: Typical Properties of Winners and Losers in Discrete Optimization. In: Proc. of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC-2004), pp. 343–352 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borgwardt, K.H., Brzank, J.: Average Saving Effects in Enumerative Methods for Solving Knapsack Problems. Journal of Complexity 10, 129–141 (1994)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crescenzi, P., Kann, V., Halldorsson, M., Karpinski, M., Woeginger, G.: A compendium of NP optimization problems, http://www.nada.kth.se/~viggo/problemlist/compendium.html
  8. 8.
    Dyer, M.E., Frieze, A.M.: Probabilistic Analysis of the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem. Mathematics of Operations Research 14(1), 162–176 (1989)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garey, M., Johnson, D.: Computers and Intractability. Freeman, New York (1979)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldberg, A., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A.: On Finding the Exact Solution to a Zero-One Knapsack Problem. In: Proc. of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC-1984), pp. 359–368 (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lueker, G.S.: Average-Case Analysis of Off-Line and On-Line Knapsack Problems. Journal of Algorithms 19, 277–305 (1998)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spielman, D.A., Teng, S.-H.: Smoothed Analysis of Algorithms: Why The Simplex Algorithm Usually Takes Polynomial Time. Journal of the ACM 51(3), 385–463 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heiko Röglin
    • 1
  • Berthold Vöcking
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceRWTH Aachen 

Personalised recommendations