Advertisement

The Instrumentality of Information Needs and Relevance

  • Olof Sundin
  • Jenny Johannisson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3507)

Abstract

An important question in Library and Information Science (LIS) is for what purpose information is sought; information seeking is not carried out for its own sake but to achieve an objective that lies beyond the practice of information seeking itself. Therefore, instrumentality could be seen as an overarching principle in the LIS field. Three different epistemological approaches to information needs and relevance, and the views on instrumentality that goes with them, are presented: the structure approach, the individual approach and the communication approach. The aim of the paper is to show how a communication oriented, neo-pragmatist epistemology enables research that in a dialogic manner highlights both the social contexts that information users are part of, and positions users as active contributors to the shaping of these contexts. The power relations that permeate these processes of negotiation between users and contexts are highlighted by introducing a Foucauldian perspective on power.

Keywords

Structure Approach Individual Approach Knowledge Claim Information Seek Governing Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rorty, R.: Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1979)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mouffe, C.: Deconstruction, pragmatism and the politics of democracy. In: Mouffe, C. (ed.) Deconstruction and Pragmatism, pp. 1–12. Routledge, London (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foucault, M.: Governmentality. In: Burchell, G., et al. (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87–104. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson, T.: On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation 37, 3–15 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Case, D.: Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. Academic Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Talja, S., Keso, H., Pietiläinen, T.: The Production of ‘Context’ in Information Seeking Research: A Metatheoretical View. Information Processing and Management 35, 751–763 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Talja, S., Tuominen, K., Savolainen, R.: “Isms” in Information Science: Constructivism, Collectivism and Constructionism. Journal of Documentation 61, 79–101 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tuominen, K., Talja, S., Savolainen, R.: Discourse, Cognition and Reality: Towards a Social Constructionist Metatheory for Library and Information Science. In: Bruce, H., Fidel, R., Ingwersen, P., Vakkari, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS): Emerging Frameworks and Methods, pp. 271–283. Libraries Unlimited, Greenwood Village (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pettigrew, K.E., Fiedel, R., Bruce, H.: Conceptual Frameworks in Information Behaviour. In: Williams, M. (ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 35, pp. 43–78. Information Today Inc., Medford (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hjørland, B., Albrechtsen, H.: Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain-Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46, 400–425 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor, R.S.: Information Use Environments. In: Dervin, B. (ed.) Progress in Communication Sciences, vol. 10, pp. 217–255. Ablex. P., Norwood (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marcella, R., Baxter, J.: The Information Needs and the Information Seeking Behaviour of a National Sample of the Population in the United Kingdom, with Special References to Needs Related to Citizenship. Journal of Documentation 55, 159–183 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Line, M.B.: The Information Uses and Needs of Social Scientists: an Overview of INFROSS. Aslib Proceedings 23, 412–434 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borlund, P.: The Concept of Relevance in IR. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54, 913–925 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Belkin, N.: Anomalous States of Knowledge as a Basis for Information Retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Sciences 5, 133–143 (1980)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dervin, B.: Useful Theory for Librarianship: Communication, not Information. Drexel Library Quarterly 13, 16–32 (1977)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ingwersen, P.: Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory. Journal of Documentation 52, 3–50 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuhlthau, C.C.: Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the Users’ Perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42, 361–371 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M.B., Nilan, M.S.: A Re-examination of Relevance: Toward a Dynamic, Situational Definition. Information Processing & Management 26, 755–775 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saracevic, T.: Relevance Reconsidered 1996. In: Ingwersen, P., Pors, N.O. (eds.) Proceedings of CoLIS 2, Second International Conference of Library and Information Science: Integration in Perspective, pp. 201–218. Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McKenzie, P.: Positioning Theory and the Negotiation of Information Needs in a Clinical Midwifery Setting. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55, 685–694 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Talja, S.: Constituting “Information” and “User” as Research Objects: a Theory of Knowledge Formations as an Alternative to the Information Man-Theory. In: Vakkari, P., Savolainen, R., Dervin, B. (eds.) Information Seeking in Context (ISIC). Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, pp. 67–80. Taylor Graham, London (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hjørland, B.: Information Seeking and Subject Representation: an Activity-Theoretical Approach to Information Science. Greenwood Press, Westport (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tuominen, K., Savolainen, R.: A Social Constructionist Approach to the Study of Information Use as Discursive Action. In: Vakkari, P., Savolainen, R., Dervin, B. (eds.) Information Seeking in Context (ISIC). Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, pp. 81–96. Taylor Graham, London (1997)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sundin, O., Johannisson, J.: Pragmatism, Neo-pragmatism and Sociocultural Theory: Communicative Participation as a Perspective in LIS. Journal of Documentation 61, 23–43 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sundin, O.: Towards an Understanding of Symbolic Aspects of Professional Information: an Analysis of the Nursing Knowledge Domain. Knowledge Organization 30, 170–181 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilson, P.: Second-Hand Knowledge: an Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. Greenwood Press, Westport (1983)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rorty, R.: Philosophy and Social Hope. Penguin Books, London (1999)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malachowski, A.: Richard Rorty. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hindess, B.: Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault. Blackwell, Oxford (1996)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rose, N.: Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tuominen, K.: User-Centered Discourse: an Analysis of the Subject Positions of the User and the Librarian. Library Quarterly 67, 350–371 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olof Sundin
    • 1
  • Jenny Johannisson
    • 1
  1. 1.Swedish School of Library and Information ScienceGöteborg University & University College of BoråsBoråsSweden

Personalised recommendations