The ProM Framework: A New Era in Process Mining Tool Support
Under the umbrella of buzzwords such as “Business Activity Monitoring” (BAM) and “Business Process Intelligence” (BPI) both academic (e.g., EMiT, Little Thumb, InWoLvE, Process Miner, and MinSoN) and commercial tools (e.g., ARIS PPM, HP BPI, and ILOG JViews) have been developed. The goal of these tools is to extract knowledge from event logs (e.g., transaction logs in an ERP system or audit trails in a WFM system), i.e., to do process mining. Unfortunately, tools use different formats for reading/storing log files and present their results in different ways. This makes it difficult to use different tools on the same data set and to compare the mining results. Furthermore, some of these tools implement concepts that can be very useful in the other tools but it is often difficult to combine tools. As a result, researchers working on new process mining techniques are forced to build a mining infrastructure from scratch or test their techniques in an isolated way, disconnected from any practical applications. To overcome these kind of problems, we have developed the ProM framework, i.e., an “pluggable” environment for process mining. The framework is flexible with respect to the input and output format, and is also open enough to allow for the easy reuse of code during the implementation of new process mining ideas. This paper introduces the ProM framework and gives an overview of the plug-ins that have been developed.
KeywordsLinear Temporal Logic Mining Result Process Perspective Transactional Model Linear Temporal Logic Formula
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, A.J.M.M. (eds.): Process Mining, Special Issue of Computers in Industry, vol. 53(3). Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
- 6.Agrawal, R., Gunopulos, D., Leymann, F.: Mining Process Models from Workflow Logs. In: Sixth International Conference on Extending Database Technology, pp. 469–483 (1998)Google Scholar
- 9.Grigori, D., Casati, F., Dayal, U., Shan, M.C.: Improving Business Process Quality through Exception Understanding, Prediction, and Prevention. In: Apers, P., Atzeni, P., Ceri, S., Paraboschi, S., Ramamohanarao, K., Snodgrass, R. (eds.) Proceedings of 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2001), pp. 159–168. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
- 11.IDS Scheer. ARIS Process Performance Manager (ARIS PPM): Measure, Analyze and Optimize Your Business Process Performance (whitepaper). IDS Scheer, Saarbruecken, Gemany (2002), http://www.ids-scheer.com
- 12.Keller, G., Teufel, T.: SAP R/3 Process Oriented Implementation. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
- 13.de Medeiros, A.K.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Using Genetic Algorithms to Mine Process Models: Representation, Operators and Results. BETA Working Paper Series, WP 124, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2004)Google Scholar
- 14.zur Mühlen, M., Rosemann, M.: Workflow-based Process Monitoring and Controlling - Technical and Organizational Issues. In: Sprague, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS-33), pp. 1–10. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2000)Google Scholar
- 16.Staffware. Staffware Process Monitor, SPM (2002), http://www.staffware.com
- 17.Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Rediscovering Workflow Models from Event-Based Data using Little Thumb. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 10(2), 151–162 (2003)Google Scholar
- 18.Wen, L., Wang, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Wang, Z., Sun, J.: A Novel Approach for Process Mining Based on Event Types. In: BETA Working Paper Series, WP 118. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2004)Google Scholar