Evolution of Cooperating ANNs Through Functional Phenotypic Affinity

  • F. Bellas
  • J. A. Becerra
  • R. J. Duro
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3512)

Abstract

This work deals with the problem of automatically obtaining ANNs that cooperate in modelling of complex functions. We propose an algorithm where the combination of networks takes place at the phenotypic operational level. Thus, we evolve a population of networks that are automatically classified into different species depending on the performance of their phenotype, and individuals of each species cooperate forming a group to obtain a complex output. The components that make up the groups are basic ANNs (primitives) and could be reused in other search processes as seeds or could be combined to generate new solutions. The magnitude that reflects the difference between ANNs is their affinity vector, which must be automatically created and modified. The main objective of this approach is to model complex functions such as environment models in robotics or multidimensional signals.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smalz, R., Conrad, M.: Combining evolution with credit apportionment: A new learning algorithm for neural nets. Neural Networks 7(2) (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Opitz, D.W., Shavlik, J.W.: Actively searching for an effective neural network ensemble. Connection Sci. 8(3) (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moriarty, D.E., Miikkulainen, R.: Forming neural networks through efficient and adaptive coevolution. Evolutionary Computation 4(5) (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darwen, P., Yao, X.: Speciation as automatic categorical modularization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1(2) (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg, D., Richardson, J.: Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conf. on Genetic Algorithms (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deb, K., Goldberg, D.E.: An investigation of niche and species-formation in genetic function optimization. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, pp. 42–50 (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coello, C., Van Veldhuizen, D., Lamont, G.: Evolutionary algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DellaCioppa, A., DeStefano, C., Marcelli, A.: On the Role of Population Size and Niche Radius in Fitness Sharing. IEEE Trans on Evolutionary Computation 8(6) (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    García-Pedrajas, N., Hervás-Martínez, C., Muñoz-Pérez, J.: COVNET: A Cooperative Coevolutionary Model for Evolving Artificial Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 14(3) (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Bellas
    • 1
  • J. A. Becerra
    • 1
  • R. J. Duro
    • 1
  1. 1.Grupo de Sistemas AutónomosUniversidade da CoruñaSpain

Personalised recommendations