Integration of Rules and Optimization in Plant PowerOps

  • Thomas Bousonville
  • Filippo Focacci
  • Claude Le Pape
  • Wim Nuijten
  • Frederic Paulin
  • Jean-Francois Puget
  • Anna Robert
  • Alireza Sadeghin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3524)

Abstract

Plant PowerOps (PPO) [9] is a new ILOG product, based on business rules and optimization technology, dedicated to production planning and detailed scheduling for manufacturing. This paper describes how PPO integrates a rule based system with the optimization engines and the graphical user interface. The integration proposed is motivated by the need to allow business users to manage unexpected changes in their environment. It provides a flexible interface for configuring, maintaining and tuning the system and for managing optimization scenarios. The proposed approach is discussed via several use cases we encountered in practice in supply chain management. Nevertheless, we believe that most of the ideas described in this paper apply in almost any area of optimization application.

Keywords

Supply Chain Customer Order Business Rule Enterprise Resource Planning Business Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Caseau, Y., Koppstein, P.: A Rule-based approach to a Time-Constrainted Traveling Salesman Problem. In: Proceedings of Symposium of Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caseau, Y., Laburthe, F.: CLAIRE: Combining objects and rules for problem solving. In: Ida, T., Chakravarty, M.T., Guo, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the JICSLP 1996 workshop on multi-paradigm logic programming (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caseau, Y., Koppstein, P.: A cooperative-architecture expert system for solving large time/travel assignment problems. In: Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 197–202 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kohl, N., Andersson, E., Housos, E., Wedelin, D.: Crew pairing optimization. In: Yu, G. (ed.), pp. 228–258. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forgy, C.L.: Rete: a fast algorithm for the many pattern/many object pattern match problem. Artificial Intelligence, 17–37 (1982)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frühwirth, T.: Theory and practice of constraint handling rules. Journal of Logic Programming, Special Issue on Constraint Logic Programming 37(1-3), 95–138 (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hjorring, C.A., Hansen, J.: Column generation with a rule modelling language for airline crew pairing. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society of New Zealand (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ILOG. ILOG JRules 5.0 User’s Manual and Reference ManualGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ILOG. ILOG Plant PowerOps 1.0 User’s Manual and Reference ManualGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Pape, C.: Soja: A daily workshop scheduling system. soja’s system and inference engine. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Technical Conference of the British Computer Society Specialist Group on Expert Systems, Warwick, United Kingdom (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Bousonville
    • 1
  • Filippo Focacci
    • 1
  • Claude Le Pape
    • 1
  • Wim Nuijten
    • 1
  • Frederic Paulin
    • 1
  • Jean-Francois Puget
    • 1
  • Anna Robert
    • 1
  • Alireza Sadeghin
    • 1
  1. 1.ILOG S.AGentillyFrance

Personalised recommendations