Advertisement

Conversion into Three-Dimensional Implicit Surface Representation from Topological Active Volumes Based Segmentation

  • José Rouco
  • Noelia Barreira
  • Manuel G. Penedo
  • Xosé M. Pardo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3522)

Abstract

In the last few years, the advances in three-dimensional medical image processing have made possible operations like planning or simulation over real data. Different representations of structures or models have been proposed, being the implicit surfaces one of the most flexible models for processing. This paper introduces a new method for computing the implicit surfaces from the explicit representations of the objects segmented in three-dimensional images. This proposal is based on the approximation of the surfaces using distance functions and natural neighbor interpolation. The system has been tested over CT images of tibia and femur where the explicit representation has been extracted through a TAV model [1]. The results obtained show the suitability of the method for a correct representation of the target objects.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barreira, N., Penedo, M.G.: Topological active volumes for segmentation and shape reconstruction of medical images. In: Campilho, A.C., Kamel, M.S. (eds.) ICIAR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3212, pp. 43–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloomenthal, J.: An implicit surface polygonizer. In: Graphics gems IV, pp. 324–349. Academic Press Professional, Inc., London (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boissonnat, J.D., Cazals, F.: Smooth Surface Reconstruction via Natural Neighbor Interpolation of Distance Functions. In: Proceedings of 16th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 223–232 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breen, D.E., Mauch, S., Whitaker, R.T., Mao, J.: 3D Metamorphosis between different types of geometric models. In: Eurographics 2001 Proceedings, September 2001, pp. 36–48. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E.: Pattern classification and scene analysis. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken (1973)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leboran, V., Dosil, R., Pardo, X.M.: Smooth Surface Reconstruction from Points and Normals using Implicit Surfaces. In: Actas del XIII Congreso Español de Informática Gráfica (CEIG 2003), pp. 203–216 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Osher, S., Fedkiw, R.: Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, S., O’Brien, J.F., Shewchuk, J.R.: Interpolating and Approximating Implicit Surfaces from Polygon Soup. In: Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Satherley, R., Jones, M.W.: Hybrid distance field computation for volumetric objects. In: Proceedings of the Joint IEEE TCVG and Eurographics Workshop, pp. 121–133 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yngve, G., Turk, G.: Robust Creation of Implicit Surfaces from Polygonal Meshes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 8(4), 346–359 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Rouco
    • 1
  • Noelia Barreira
    • 1
  • Manuel G. Penedo
    • 1
  • Xosé M. Pardo
    • 2
  1. 1.Dpto. Computación. Fac. InformáticaUniversidade da CoruñaA CoruñaSpain
  2. 2.Dpto. Electrónica e ComputaciónUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain

Personalised recommendations