ISI 2005: Intelligence and Security Informatics pp 198-208 | Cite as
Automatic Extraction of Deceptive Behavioral Cues from Video
Abstract
This research initiative is an initial investigation into a novel approach for deriving indicators of deception from video-taped interaction. The team utilized two-dimensional spatial inputs extracted from video to construct a set of discrete and inter-relational features. The features for thirty-eight video interactions were then analyzed using discriminant analysis. Additionally, features were used to build a multivariate regression model. Through this exploratory study, the team established the validity of the approach, and identified a number of promising features, opening the door for further investigation.
Keywords
Nonverbal Behavior Video Segment Triangle Area Truth Teller Deception DetectionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Vrij, A.: Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice. John Wily & Sons Ltd, West Sussex (2000)Google Scholar
- 2.Ben-Shakhar, G., Elaad, E.: The Validity of Psychophysiological Detection of Information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 131–151 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ganis, G., Kosslyn, S.M., Stose, S., Thompson, W.L., Yurgelun-Todd, D.A.: Neural Correlates of Different Types of Deception: An fMRI Investigation. Cerebral Cortex 13, 830–836 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Johnson, R., Barnhardt, J., Zhu, J.: The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding. Neuropsychologia 42, 878–901 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Tippett, R.G.: A Comparison Between Decision Accuracy Rates Obtained Using the Polygraph Instrument and the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer in the Absence of Jeopardy. In: Florida Department of Law Enforcement, vol. 2003 (1994)Google Scholar
- 6.DePaulo, B., Lindsay, J., Malone, B., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., Cooper, H.: Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129, 74–118 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception. Psychiatry 32, 88–105 (1969)Google Scholar
- 8.Zuckerman, M., Driver, R.E.: Telling Lies: Verbal and Nonverbal Correlates of Deception. In: Siegman, A.W., Feldstein, S. (eds.) Nonverbal Communication: An Integrated Perspective, pp. 129–147. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1985)Google Scholar
- 9.Buller, D., Burgoon, J., White, C., Ebesu, A.: Interpersonal Deception: VII. Behavioral Profiles of Falsification, Equivocation and Concealment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13, 366–395 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K.P., Bull, R.: Detecting Deceit via Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24, 239–263 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Interpersonal Deception Theory. Communication Theory 6, 203–242 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Lu, S., Metaxas, D., Samaras, D., Oliensis, J.: Using Multiple Cues for Hand Tracking and Model Refinement. Presented at IEEE CVPR 2003, Madison, Wisconsin (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.Lu, S., Tsechpenakis, G., Metaxas, D.N., Jensen, M.L., Kruse, J.: Blob Analysis of the Head and Hands: A Method for Deception Detection. Presented at Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2005), Hawaii (2005)Google Scholar
- 14.Burgoon, J.K., Adkins, M., Kruse, J., Jensen, M.L., Meservy, T., Twitchell, D.P., Deokar, A., Nunamaker, J.F., Lu, S., Tsechpenakis, G., Metaxas, D.N., Younger, R.E.: An Approach for Intent Identification by Building on Deception Detection. Presented at Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2005), Hawaii (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.Burgoon, J.K., Blair, J.P., Qin, T., Nunamaker, J.F.: Detecting Deception Through Linguistic Analysis. In: Chen, H., Miranda, R., Zeng, D.D., Demchak, C.C., Schroeder, J., Madhusudan, T. (eds.) ISI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2665, pp. 91–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Burgoon, J.K., Blair, J.P., Moyer, E.: Effects of Communication Modality on Arousal, Cognitive Complexity, Behavioral Control and Deception Detection During Deceptive Episodes. Presented at Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, Miami Beach, Florida (2003)Google Scholar