Advertisement

Comparison of Signaling and Packet Forwarding Overhead for HMIP and MIFA

  • Ali Diab
  • Andreas Mitschele-Thiel
  • René Böringer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3510)

Abstract

Handoff latency affects the service quality of real-time applications. In this paper we develop an analytical model to analyze the Mobile IP Fast Authentication protocol (MIFA) and compare it to Hierarchical Mobile IP (HMIP). The study compares the signaling costs of the protocols as well as the overall load for packet forwarding. Our study shows that MIFA minimizes the packet delivery cost compared to HMIP. Additionally, MIFA is more efficient when the arrival rate of the packets increases. Thus MIFA outperforms HMIP with respect to signaling cost. From the performance point of view MIFA performs similar to HMIP when the domain consists of two hierarchy levels only, and outperform HMIP otherwise. However, MIFA does not require a hierarchical network architecture as HMIP does.

Keywords

Mobile Node Mobility Agent Home Agent Foreign Agent Correspond Node 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Perkins, C.E.: MOBILE IP - Design Principles and Practices (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perkins, C. (ed.): IP Mobility Support for IPv4. RFC: 3344 (August 2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson, D., Perkins, C., Arkko, J.: Mobility Support in IPv6. draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-23.txt (October 2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perkins, C.E., Calhoun, P.R.: Generalized Key Distribution Extensions for Mobile IP. draft-ietf-mobileip-gen-key-00.txt, July 2 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson, D.B., Asokan, N.: Registration Keys for Route Optimization. draft-ietf- mobileip-regkey-03.txt, July 14 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dommety, G., Ye, T.: Local and Indirect Registration for Anchoring Handoffs. draft-dommety-mobileip-anchor-handoff-01.txt (July 2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perkins, C.E., Wang, K.-Y.: Optimized Smooth Handoffs in Mobile IP. In: Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (July 1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gustafsson, E., Jonsson, A., Perkins, C.E.: Mobile IPv4 Regional Registration. draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-tunnel-08.txt (November 2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soliman, H., Castelluccia, C., El-Malki, K., Bellier, L.: Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6). draft-ietf-mobileip-hmipv6-08.txt (June 2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    El Malki, K., et al.: Low Latency Handoffs in Mobile IPv4. draft-ietf-mobileip-lowlatency-handoffs-v4-04.txt (June 2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blondia, C., et al.: Low Latency Handoff Mechanisms and Their Implementation in an IEEE 802.11 Network. In: Proceedings of ITC18, Berlin, Germany (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Casals, O., et al.: Performance Evaluation of the Post-Registration Method, a Low Latency Handoff in MIPV4. In: Proceedings of IEEE 2003 International Confernence on Communications (ICC 2003), Anchorage (May 2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blondia, C., et al.: Performance Comparison of Low Latency Mobile IP Schemes. In: Proceedings at WiOpt 2003 Modeling and Optimization in Mobile Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks, INRIA, Sophia Antipolis, March 2003, pp. 115–124 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsieh, R., Zhou, Z.-G., Seneviratn, A.: S-MIP: A Seamless Handoff Architecture for Mobile IP. In: Proceedings of INFOCOM, San Francisco, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diab, A., Mitschele-Thiel, A.: Minimizing Mobile IP Handoff Latency. In: 2nd International Working Conference on Performance modelling and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Networks (HET-NETs 2004), Ilkley, West Yorkshire, U.K, July 26 - 28 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diab, A., Mitschele-Thiel, A., Xu, J.: Perfomance Analysis of the Mobile IP Fast Authentication Protocol. In: Seventh ACM Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWIM 2004), Venice, Italy, October 4-6 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pack, S., Choi, Y.: Fast Inter-AP Handoff using Predictive-Authentication Scheme in a Public Wireless LAN. In: Networks 2002 (August 2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sen, S.K., et al.: A Selective Location Update Strategy for PCS Users. ACM/Baltzer J. Wireless Networks (September 1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tzeng, H.-Y., Przygienda, T.: On Fast Address-Lookup Algorithms. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Comm (JSAC) 17(6), 1067–1082 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Diab
    • 1
  • Andreas Mitschele-Thiel
    • 1
  • René Böringer
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair for Integrated HW/SW-SystemsIlmenau University of TechnologyIlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations