Advertisement

Participation in Community Systems: Indications for Design

  • Ahmad J. Reeves
  • Patrick G. T. Healey
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3081)

Abstract

We argue that design for sustainable digital communities must attend to the ways that the technological infrastructure is transformed by, and in turn transforms, human communicative organisation. We present evidence from a user-contributed ’talker’ environment, TCZ, whose infrastructure and community of users have evolved over a ten-year period. TCZ is a text-based environment built on a spatial metaphor that is incorporated both into the structure of the environment and into the operation of commands. We describe a comparison of the communicative organisation of the virtual interactions in TCZ with those typical of informal face-to-face conversations. The results show that users exploit the flexibility of the online environment to overcome the constraints that spatial organisation normally place on the configuration of their communicative interactions. We highlight the limitations of the spatial metaphor as an organising architecture for online communities and identify five communication-oriented issues for design.

Keywords

Online Community Participatory Status Computer Mediate Communication Digital City Primary Participant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown, J., van Dam, A., Earnshaw, R., Encarnacao, J., Guedj, R., Preece, J., Shneiderman, B., Vince, J.: Special Report on Human-Centered computing, online communities, and virtual environments. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 33(3), 42–62 (1999b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark, H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garfinkel, H.: Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities. In: Sudnow, D. (ed.) Studies of Social Interaction, Free Press, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goffman, E.: Replies and Responses. Language in Society 5, 257–313 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goffman, E.: Forms of Talk, 3rd edn. ch. 3. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1981)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jikorta, M., Luff, P., Gilbert, N.: Participation frameworks for computer mediated communication. In: Proceedings of CSCW 1991, Amsterdam (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kollock, P.: Design principles in online communities. PC Update 15, 58–60 (1998b)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levinson, S.: Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing. Exploring the Interaction Order, Erving Goffman, p. 170 (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Monk, A.: Participatory status in electronically mediated collaborative work. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mynatt, E.D., Adler, A., Ito, M., O’Day, V.L.: Design for network communities. In: Pemberton, S. (ed.) Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 97 Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, March 22-27, pp. 210–217. ACM, New York (1997); [MUD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Preece, J.: Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Wiley, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rheingold, H.: The Virtual Community: Homestead on the Electronic Frontier. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000) (revised edn.)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmad J. Reeves
    • 1
  • Patrick G. T. Healey
    • 1
  1. 1.Interaction, Media, and Communication Research Group, Dept of Computer ScienceQueen Mary, University of London

Personalised recommendations