Advertisement

Integrating Social and Physical Perspectives of Mitigation Policy and Practice in Indonesia

  • Supriyati Andreastuti
  • Agus Budianto
  • Eko Teguh Paripurno
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Volcanology book series (VOLCAN)

Abstract

Earthquakes, tsunami, landslide and volcanic eruptions occur frequently in Indonesia. The frequency of events combined with high population and widely varied culture, differing levels of education and knowledge of natural hazards, as well as varied income, combine to give the country a high risk for natural disaster. Communication in hazard zones is affected by a number of factors such as: differing terminology and perceptions of hazards by the public, scientists, and disaster managers; how scientists and emergency managers communicate information; and how effectively the media transfers the information to the public. Communication is also complicated by culture, social factors and a wide variety of local languages. In Indonesia, disaster mitigation efforts at the national level are coordinated by National Disaster Management Agency; whereas, provincial and regional disaster agencies are responsible for managing within their domains and in most cases local authorities are responsible for specific mitigation actions, such as evacuations. Transferring hazard information is an important process in mitigation. In order to obtain efficient communication with the public, trusting relationships between scientists and communities are required. An understanding by scientists and emergency managers of local culture, local languages and people’s character facilitates communication and contributes to trust. In addition, the media used for information can contribute significantly to improving communication. Hazard communication also aims to improve the capacity of communities through enhancing their knowledge and strengthening of their mitigation institutions. In hazard zones, effective mitigation requires participation and community empowerment with activities before, during and after disasters. A lesson learned from numerous volcanic eruptions in Indonesia is that each volcano has a different character, based not only the physical characteristics of eruptions but also on geographic, social and cultural features. These features result in different responses of people during crises and they influence the way scientists and government agencies communicate and deal with the process of evacuation and repatriation.

Keywords

Natural hazards Hazard communication Information transfer Lessons learnt Community capacity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank to the Director of Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation, Indonesia for providing chance to us to involve in many activities in pre-disaster and during crisis. We are also grateful to John Pallister of the USGS, for provide fruitful comments, and in the preparation and editing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Chester DK (2005) Theology and disaster studies: the need for dialogue. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 146:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cronin SJ, Gaylord DR, Charley D, Brent V, Alloway BV, Wallez S, Esau JW (2004a) Participatory methods of incorporating scientific with traditional knowledge for volcanic hazard management on Ambae Island, Vanuatu, Bulletin of Volcanology, vol 66, pp 652–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cronin SJ, Patterson MG, Taylor PW, Biliki R (2004b) Maximising multi-stakeholder participation in government and community volcanic hazard management programs: a case study from Savo, Solomon Islands. Nat Hazards 33:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Damen L (1987) Culture learning: the fifth dimension in the language classroom, vol 11478. Addison Wesley Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Dominey-Howes D, Minos-Minopoulos D (2004) Perception of hazard and Risk on Santorini. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 137:285–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donovan K (2009) Doing social volcanology: exploring volcanic culture in Indonesia. Area 42:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Government of Indonesia (2007) Law of Republic Indonesia no 24, 2007 concerning disaster mitigation, published by the Government of IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Government of Indonesia (2008) Regulation of Head of National Disaster Management Agency No 4, published by the Government of IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Government of Indonesia (2010) Badan Pusat Statistik (Central Bureau of Statistics). http://www.bps.go.id/tab_sub/view.php?tabel=1&id_subyek=12
  10. Government of Indonesia (2014) Indonesia National Disaster Management Agency, Rencana Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana 2015–2019 (National Disaster Mitigation Plan), published by the Government of IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Government of Indonesia (2015) Indonesia National Standard, Training guideline for community preparedness against hazards of volcanic eruption (Standar Nasional Indonesia, Panduan Pelatihan Kesiapsiagaan Masyarakat Terhadap Bahaya Erupsi Gunungapi), published by the Government of Indonesia (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Haynes K, Barclay J, Pidgeon N (2008a) Whose reality counts? Factors affecting the perception of volcanic risk. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haynes K, Barclay J, Pidgeon N (2008b) The issue of trust and its influence on risk, communication during a volcanic crisis. Bull Volcanol 70:605–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lavigne F, de Coster B, Juvin N, Flohic F, Gailard JC, Texier P, Morin J, Sartohadi J (2008) People’s behaviour in the face of volcanic hazard: perspective from Javanese communities, Indonesia. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morchio R (1993) The effect of the uncertainty in natural prediction on the user communities. In: Nemec J, Nigg JM, Siggardi F (eds) Prediction and perception of natural hazards. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paton D, Johnston D (2001) Disasters and communities: vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 10:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Perry RW, Lindell MK (2008) Volcanic risk perception and adjustment in a multi-hazard environment. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172:170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ronan KR, Johnston DM (2005) Promoting community resilience in disasters; the role for schools, youth, and families. Springer, New York 213 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Solana MC, Kilburn CRJ, Rolandi G (2008) Communicating eruption and hazard forecasts on Vesuvius, Southern Italy. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172:308–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. UNISDR (2009) UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access    This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Supriyati Andreastuti
    • 1
  • Agus Budianto
    • 1
  • Eko Teguh Paripurno
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard MitigationBandungIndonesia
  2. 2.Universitas Pembangunan Nasional ‘Veteran’ YogyakartaCondongcatur, Daerah Istimewa, YogyakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations