Advertisement

Bioprinting Technologies in Tissue Engineering

  • Bengi Yilmaz
  • Aydin Tahmasebifar
  • Erkan Türker BaranEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology book series (ABE, volume 171)

Abstract

Bioprinting technology is a strong tool in producing living functional tissues and organs from cells, biomaterial-based bioinks, and growth factors in computer-controlled platform. The aim of this chapter is to present recent progresses in bioprinting of nerve, skin, cardiac, bone, cartilage, skeletal muscle, and other soft tissues and highlight the challenges in these applications. Various composite bioinks with bioactive ceramic-based scaffolds having patient-specific design and controlled micro-architectures were used at clinical and preclinical applications successfully for regeneration of bone. In nerve tissue engineering, bioprinting of alginate- and gelatin-based gel bioinks by extrusion presented a controllable 3D microstructures and showed satisfactory cytocompatibility and axonal regeneration. Bioprinting of cardiac progenitors in biopolymers resulted in limited success, while the use of bioinks from extracellular matrix induced satisfactory results in cardiac regeneration. Osteochondral scaffold bioprinting is challenging due to the complex hierarchical structure and limited chondral regeneration. Therefore, current approaches focused on osteochondral scaffold with vascular network and mimicking hierarchical structures. The applications of bioprinting in other types of tissues were also studied, and results showed significant potentials in regeneration of tissues such as cornea, liver, and urinary bladder.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Bioprinting Bone Cardiac Cartilage Nerve Skin Tissue engineering 

References

  1. 1.
    Sundaramurthi D, Rauf S, Hauser CAE (2016) 3D bioprinting technology for regenerative medicine applications. Int J Bioprinting 2:9–26.  https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2016.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mironov V, Reis N, Derby B (2006) Bioprinting: a beginning. Tissue Eng 12:631–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mironov V, Visconti RP, Kasyanov V, Forgacs G, Drake CJ, Markwald RR (2009) Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks. Biomaterials 30:2164–2174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, Burdick JA, Cho D-W, Dalton PD, Derby B, Forgacs G, Li Q, Mironov VA, Moroni L, Nakamura M, Shu W, Takeuchi S, Vozzi G, Woodfield TBF, Xu T, Yoo JJ, Malda J (2016) Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication 8:013001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Varkey M, Atala A (2018) Current challenges and future perspectives of bioprinting. In: Khademhosseini A, Camci-Unal G (eds) 3D bioprinting in regenerative engineering principles and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 363–373Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vyas D, Udyawar D (2019) A review on current state of art of bioprinting. In: Kumar J, Pandey PM, Ian D (eds) 3D printing and additive manufacturing technologies. Springer, Singapore, pp 195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2018) Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/. Accessed 2 Dec 2018
  8. 8.
    Cui H, Nowicki M, Fisher JP, Zhang LG (2017) 3D bioprinting for organ regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 6.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601118
  9. 9.
    Skardal A (2018) Principles and applications of bioprinting. In: Khademhosseini A, Camci-Unal G (eds) 3D bioprinting in regenerative engineering principles and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swainson WK (1977) Method, medium and apparatus for producing three-dimensional figure productGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hull CW (1984) Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithographyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whitaker M (2014) The history of 3D printing in healthcare. Bull R Coll Surg Engl 96:228–229.  https://doi.org/10.1308/147363514X13990346756481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Su A, Al’Aref SJ (2018) Chapter 1 – History of 3D printing. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wohlers T, Gornet T (2016) History of additive manufacturing. Wohlers Rep 24:118Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Butt J, Shirvani H (2018) Additive, subtractive, and hybrid manufacturing processes. In: Bar-Cohen Y (ed) Advances in manufacturing and processing of materials and structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 187–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jose RR, Rodriquez MJ, Dixon TA, Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL (2016) Evolution of bioinks and additive manufacturing technologies for 3D bioprinting. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:1662–1678.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murphy K, Dorfman S, Smith N, Bauwens L, Sohn I, Mcdonald T, Leigh-Lancaster C, Law RJ (2012) Devices, systems, and methods for the fabrication of tissue, p 1Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shafiee A, Atala A (2016) Printing technologies for medical applications. Trends Mol Med 22:254–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2016.01.003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson WC, Boland T (2003) Cell and organ printing 1: protein and cell printers. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 271:491–496.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.10057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boland T, Wilson WC, Xu T (2006) Inkjet printing of viable cells. Biomaterials 26:93–99Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doyle K (2014) Bioprinting: from patches to parts. Genet Eng Biotechnol News 34:34–35.  https://doi.org/10.1089/gen.34.10.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tappa K, Jammalamadaka U (2018) Novel biomaterials used in medical 3D printing techniques. J Funct Biomater 9:17–33.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010017CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Cheng K, Hin S (2002) Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23:1169–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu W, Geng P, Li G, Zhao D, Zhang H, Zhao J (2015) Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials 8:5834–5846.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu W, Zhong Z, Hu N, Zhou Y, Maggio L, Miri A, Fragasso A, Jin X, Khademhosseini A, Zhang Y (2017) Coaxial extrusion bioprinting of 3D microfibrous constructs with cell-favorable gelatin methacryloyl microenvironments. Biofabrication 10:024102.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa9d44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Odde DJ, Renn MJ (1999) Laser-guided direct writing for applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 17:385–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang B, Luo Y, Ma L, Gao L, Li Y, Xue Q, Yang H, Cui Z (2018) 3D bioprinting: an emerging technology full of opportunities and challenges. Bio-Des Manuf 1:2–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-018-0004-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S, Duocastella M, Pippenger B, Bellance S, Bareille R, Rémy M, Bordenave L, Amédée J, Guillemot F (2010) Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials 31:7250–7256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.055CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang Y, Zhang X, Gao G, Yonezawa T, Cui X (2017) 3D bioprinting and the current applications in tissue engineering. Biotechnol J 12:1600734.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201600734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ozbolat IT (2017) 3D bioprinting fundamentals, principles and applications. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dhariwala B, Hunt E, Boland T (2004) Rapid prototyping of tissue-engineering constructs, using photopolymerizable hydrogels and stereolithography. Tissue Eng 10:1316–1322.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ng WL, Goh MH, Yeong WY, Naing MW (2018) Applying macromolecular crowding to 3D bioprinting: fabrication of 3D hierarchical porous collagen-based hydrogel constructs. Biomater Sci 6:562–574.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7BM01015JCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Agarwala S (2016) A perspective on 3D bioprinting technology: present and future. Am J Eng Appl Sci 9:985–990.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2016.985.990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ng WL, Lee JM, Yeong WY, Win Naing M (2017) Microvalve-based bioprinting – process, bio-inks and applications. Biomater Sci 5:632–647.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6BM00861ECrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blaeser A, Duarte Campos DF, Puster U, Richtering W, Stevens MM, Fischer H (2016) Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv Healthc Mater 5:326–333.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Derby B (2010) Inkjet printing of functional and structural materials: fluid property requirements, feature stability, and resolution. Annu Rev Mater Res 40:395–414.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tibbits S (2014) 4D printing: multi-material shape change. Archit Des 84:116–121Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gao B, Yang Q, Zhao X, Jin G, Ma Y, Xu F (2016) 4D bioprinting for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol 34:746–756.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ashammakhi N, Ahadian S, Zengjie F, Suthiwanich K, Lorestani F, Orive G, Ostrovidov S, Khademhosseini A (2018) Advances and future perspectives in 4D bioprinting. Biotechnol J 13:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201800148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhu W, Webster TJ, Zhang LG (2019) 4D printing smart biosystems for nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 14:1643–1645.  https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2019-0134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yang GH, Yeo M, Koo YW, Kim GH (2019) 4D bioprinting: technological advances in biofabrication. Macromol Biosci 19:1800441.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201800441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cidonio G, Glinka M, Dawson JI, Oreffo ROC (2019) The cell in the ink: improving biofabrication by printing stem cells for skeletal regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 209:10–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.04.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Li Y, Zhang YS, Akpek A, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A (2017) 4D bioprinting: the next-generation technology for biofabrication enabled by stimuli-responsive materials. Biofabrication 9:012001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/012001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sowjanya JA, Singh J, Mohita T, Sarvanan S, Moorthi A, Srinivasan N, Selvamurugan N (2013) Biocomposite scaffolds containing chitosan/alginate/nano-silica for bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 109:294–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.04.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Velasco MA, Narváez-Tovar CA, Garzón-Alvarado DA (2015) Design, materials, and mechanobiology of biodegradable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Res Int 2015:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/729076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Venkatesan J, Bhatnagar I, Manivasagan P, Kang K-H, Kim S-K (2015) Alginate composites for bone tissue engineering: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 72:269–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Turnbull G, Clarke J, Picard F, Riches P, Jia L, Han F, Li B, Shu W (2018) 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater 3:278–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pacifici A, Laino L, Gargari M, Guzzo F, Velandia Luz A, Polimeni A, Pacifici L (2018) Decellularized hydrogels in bone tissue engineering: a topical review. Int J Med Sci 15:492–497.  https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.22789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gilmore J, Burg T, Groff RE, Burg KJL (2017) Design and optimization of a novel bio-loom to weave melt-spun absorbable polymers for bone tissue engineering: design and optimization of a novel bio-loom. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105:1342–1351.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ashammakhi N, Kaarela O (2017) Three-dimensional bioprinting can help bone. J Craniofac Surg 00:1.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhang L, Yang G, Johnson BN, Jia X (2019) Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair. Acta Biomater 84:16–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Demirtaş TT, Irmak G, Gümüşderelioğlu M (2017) Bioprintable form of chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Biofabrication 9:035003.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7b1dCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, Santiago GT, Alvarez MM, Jia W, Kazemzadeh-narbat M, Shin SR, Tamayol A, Khademhosseini A (2017) Bioprinted osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D bone tissue. Adv Healthc Mater 6:1700015.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Neufurth M, Wang X, Schröder HC, Feng Q, Diehl-Seifert B, Ziebart T, Steffen R, Wang S, Müller WEG (2014) Engineering a morphogenetically active hydrogel for bioprinting of bioartificial tissue derived from human osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells. Biomaterials 35:8810–8819.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wenz A, Borchers K, Tovar GEM, Kluger PJ (2017) Bone matrix production in hydroxyapatite-modified hydrogels suitable for bone bioprinting. Biofabrication 9:044103.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa91ecCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zhai X, Ruan C, Ma Y, Cheng D, Wu M, Liu W, Zhao X, Pan H, Lu WW (2018) 3D-bioprinted osteoblast-laden nanocomposite hydrogel constructs with induced microenvironments promote cell viability, differentiation, and osteogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. Adv Sci 5:1700550.  https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ahlfeld T, Doberenz F, Kilian D, Vater C, Korn P, Lauer G, Lode A, Gelinsky M (2018) Bioprinting of mineralized constructs utilizing multichannel plotting of a self-setting calcium phosphate cement and a cell-laden bioink. Biofabrication 10:045002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aad36dCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chen Y, Shen Y, Ho C, Yu J, Wu YA, Wang K, Shih C-T, Shie M-Y (2018) Osteogenic and angiogenic potentials of the cell-laden hydrogel/mussel-inspired calcium silicate complex hierarchical porous scaffold fabricated by 3D bioprinting. Mater Sci Eng C 91:679–687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Murphy C, Kolan K, Li W, Semon J, Day D, Leu M (2017) 3D bioprinting of stem cells and polymer/bioactive glass composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int J Bioprinting 3:53–63.  https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2017.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bendtsen ST, Wei M (2017) In vitro evaluation of 3D bioprinted tri-polymer network scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 105:3262–3272.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Huang J, Fu H, Li C, Dai J, Zhang Z (2017) Recent advances in cell-laden 3D bioprinting: materials, technologies and applications. J 3D Print Med 1:245–268.  https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2017-0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Neufurth M, Wang X, Wang S, Steffen R, Ackermann M, Haep ND, Schröder HC, Müller WEG (2017) 3D printing of hybrid biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: calcium-polyphosphate microparticles encapsulated by polycaprolactone. Acta Biomater 64:377–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.031CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jeon HJ, Lee M, Yun S, Kang D, Park KH, Choi S, Choi E, Jin S, Shim JH, Yun WS, Yoon BJ, Park J (2019) Fabrication and characterization of 3D-printed biocomposite scaffolds based on PCL and silanated silica particles for bone tissue regeneration. Chem Eng J 360:519–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Aydogdu MO, Oner ET, Ekren N, Erdemir G, Kuruca SE, Yuca E, Bostan MS, Eroglu MS, Ikram F, Uzun M, Gunduz O (2019) Comparative characterization of the hydrogel added PLA/β-TCP scaffolds produced by 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting 13:e00046.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dong Y, Liang J, Cui Y, Xu S, Zhao N (2018) Fabrication of novel bioactive hydroxyapatite-chitosan-silica hybrid scaffolds: combined the sol-gel method with 3D plotting technique. Carbohydr Polym 197:183–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.086CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wang J, Yang M, Zhu Y, Wang L, Tomsia AP, Mao C (2014) Phage nanofibers induce vascularized osteogenesis in 3D printed bone scaffolds. Adv Mater 26:4961–4966.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Liu J, Li L, Suo H, Yan M, Yin J, Fu J (2019) 3D printing of biomimetic multi-layered GelMA/nHA scaffold for osteochondral defect repair. Mater Des 171:107708.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Du Y, Liu H, Yang Q, Wang S, Wang J, Ma J, Noh I, Mikos AG, Zhang S (2017) Selective laser sintering scaffold with hierarchical architecture and gradient composition for osteochondral repair in rabbits. Biomaterials 137:37–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.021CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Correia CR, Reis RL, Mano JF (2015) Multiphasic, multistructured and hierarchical strategies for cartilage regeneration. In: Bertassoni LE, Coelho PG (eds) Engineering mineralized and load bearing tissues. Springer, Cham, pp 143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Huang BJ, Hu JC, Athanasiou KA (2016) Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage. Biomaterials 98:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Chen L, Deng C, Li J, Yao Q, Chang J, Wang L, Wu C (2019) 3D printing of a lithium-calcium-silicate crystal bioscaffold with dual bioactivities for osteochondral interface reconstruction. Biomaterials 196:138–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bittner SM, Smith BT, Diaz-Gomez L, Hudgins CD, Melchiorri AJ, Scott DW, Fisher JP, Mikos AG (2019) Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and osteochondral tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 90:37–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.041CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Li Z, Jia S, Xiong Z, Long Q, Yan S, Hao F, Liu J, Yuan Z (2018) 3D-printed scaffolds with calcified layer for osteochondral tissue engineering. J Biosci Bioeng 126:389–396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.03.014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rajzer I, Kurowska A, Jabłoński A, Jatteau S, Śliwka M, Ziąbka M, Menaszek E (2018) Layered gelatin/PLLA scaffolds fabricated by electrospinning and 3D printing- for nasal cartilages and subchondral bone reconstruction. Mater Des 155:297–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Daly AC, Kelly DJ (2019) Biofabrication of spatially organised tissues by directing the growth of cellular spheroids within 3D printed polymeric microchambers. Biomaterials 197:194–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.12.028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Deng C, Yang Q, Sun X, Chen L, Feng C, Chang J, Wu C (2018) Bioactive scaffolds with Li and Si ions-synergistic effects for osteochondral defects regeneration. Appl Mater Today 10:203–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Di Bella C, Duchi S, O’Connell CD, Blanchard R, Augustine C, Yue Z, Thompson F, Richards C, Beirne S, Onofrillo C, Bauquier SH, Ryan SD, Pivonka P, Wallace GG, Choong PF (2018) In situ handheld three-dimensional bioprinting for cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12:611–621.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Nguyen D, Hägg DA, Forsman A, Ekholm J, Nimkingratana P, Brantsing C, Kalogeropoulos T, Zaunz S, Concaro S, Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Gatenholm P, Enejder A, Simonsson S (2017) Cartilage tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of iPS cells in a nanocellulose/alginate bioink. Sci Rep 7:658.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00690-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kuo C-Y, Wilson E, Fuson A, Gandhi N, Monfaredi R, Jenkins A, Romero M, Santoro M, Fisher JP, Cleary K, Reilly B (2018) Repair of tympanic membrane perforations with customized bioprinted ear grafts using chinchilla models. Tissue Eng Part A 24:527–535.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0246CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Thayer PS, Orrhult LS, Martínez H (2018) Bioprinting of cartilage and skin tissue analogs utilizing a novel passive mixing unit technique for bioink precellularization. J Vis Exp 131:56372.  https://doi.org/10.3791/56372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Zhu W, Cui H, Boualam B, Masood F, Flynn E, Rao RD, Zhang Z-Y, Zhang LG (2018) 3D bioprinting mesenchymal stem cell-laden construct with core–shell nanospheres for cartilage tissue engineering. Nanotechnology 29:185101.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aaafa1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Potjewyd G, Moxon S, Wang T, Domingos M, Hooper NM (2018) Tissue engineering 3D neurovascular units: a biomaterials and bioprinting perspective. Trends Biotechnol 36:457–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.01.003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Dixon AR, Jariwala SH, Bilis Z, Loverde JR, Pasquina PF, Alvarez LM (2018) Bridging the gap in peripheral nerve repair with 3D printed and bioprinted conduits. Biomaterials 186:44–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Knowlton S, Anand S, Shah T, Tasoglu S (2018) Bioprinting for neural tissue engineering. Trends Neurosci 41:31–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.11.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Naghieh S, Sarker MD, Abelseth E, Chen X (2019) Indirect 3D bioprinting and characterization of alginate scaffolds for potential nerve tissue engineering applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 93:183–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.02.014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Sarker MD, Naghieh S, McInnes AD, Ning L, Schreyer DJ, Chen X (2019) Bio-fabrication of peptide-modified alginate scaffolds: printability, mechanical stability and neurite outgrowth assessments. Bioprinting 14:e00045.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ning L, Sun H, Lelong T, Guilloteau R, Zhu N, Schreyer DJ, Chen X (2018) 3D bioprinting of scaffolds with living Schwann cells for potential nerve tissue engineering applications. Biofabrication 10:035014.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aacd30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Li X, Wang X, Wang X, Chen H, Zhang X, Zhou L, Xu T (2018) 3D bioprinted rat Schwann cell-laden structures with shape flexibility and enhanced nerve growth factor expression. 3 Biotech 8:342.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1341-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    England S, Rajaram A, Schreyer DJ, Chen X (2017) Bioprinted fibrin-factor XIII-hyaluronate hydrogel scaffolds with encapsulated Schwann cells and their in vitro characterization for use in nerve regeneration. Bioprinting 5:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2016.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Joung D, Truong V, Neitzke CC, Guo S-Z, Walsh PJ, Monat JR, Meng F, Park SH, Dutton JR, Parr AM, McAlpine MC (2018) 3D printed stem-cell derived neural progenitors generate spinal cord scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater 28:1801850.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201801850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Hsieh F-Y, Lin H-H, Hsu S (2015) 3D bioprinting of neural stem cell-laden thermoresponsive biodegradable polyurethane hydrogel and potential in central nervous system repair. Biomaterials 71:48–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Zhu W, Tringale KR, Woller SA, You S, Johnson S, Shen H, Schimelman J, Whitney M, Steinauer J, Xu W, Yaksh TL, Nguyen QT, Chen S (2018) Rapid continuous 3D printing of customizable peripheral nerve guidance conduits. Mater Today 21:951–959.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Donderwinkel I, van Hest JCM, Cameron NR (2017) Bio-inks for 3D bioprinting: recent advances and future prospects. Polym Chem 8:4451–4471.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7PY00826KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Tao J, Zhang J, Du T, Xu X, Deng X, Chen S, Liu J, Chen Y, Liu X, Xiong M, Luo Y, Cheng H, Mao J, Cardon L, Gou M, Wei Y (2019) Rapid 3D printing of functional nanoparticle-enhanced conduits for effective nerve repair. Acta Biomater 90:49–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zhou X, Cui H, Nowicki M, Miao S, Lee S-J, Masood F, Harris BT, Zhang LG (2018) Three-dimensional-bioprinted dopamine-based matrix for promoting neural regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:8993–9001.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b18197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Vijayavenkataraman S, Lu WF, Fuh JYH (2016) 3D bioprinting of skin: a state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes. Biofabrication 8:032001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Gholami P, Ahmadi-pajouh MA, Abolftahi N, Hamarneh G, Kayvanrad M (2018) Segmentation and measurement of chronic wounds for bioprinting. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 22:1269–1277.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2017.2743526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Min D, Lee W, Bae I-H, Lee TR, Croce P, Yoo S-S (2018) Bioprinting of biomimetic skin containing melanocytes. Exp Dermatol 27:453–459.  https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Ng WL, Qi JTZ, Yeong WY, Naing MW (2018) Proof-of-concept: 3D bioprinting of pigmented human skin constructs. Biofabrication 10:025005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa9e1eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Albanna M, Binder KW, Murphy SV, Kim J, Qasem SA, Zhao W, Tan J, El-Amin IB, Dice DD, Marco J, Green J, Xu T, Skardal A, Holmes JH, Jackson JD, Atala A, Yoo JJ (2019) In situ bioprinting of autologous skin cells accelerates wound healing of extensive excisional full-thickness wounds. Sci Rep 9:1856.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38366-wCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Kim BS, Gao G, Kim JY, Cho D (2019) 3D cell printing of perfusable vascularized human skin equivalent composed of epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis for better structural recapitulation of native skin. Adv Healthc Mater 8:1801019.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S, Michael S, Gruene M, Coger V, Zychlinski D, Schambach A, Reimers K, Vogt PM, Chichkov B (2012) Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:1855–1863.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Skardal A, Mack D, Kapetanovic E, Atala A, Jackson JD, Yoo J, Soker S (2012) Bioprinted amniotic fluid-derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds. Stem Cells Trans Med 1:792–802.  https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2012-0088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Augustine R (2018) Skin bioprinting: a novel approach for creating artificial skin from synthetic and natural building blocks. Prog Biomater 7:77–92.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0087-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Yan W-C, Davoodi P, Vijayavenkataraman S, Tian Y, Ng WC, Fuh JYH, Robinson KS, Wang C-H (2018) 3D bioprinting of skin tissue: from pre-processing to final product evaluation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 132:270–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    El-Serafi AT, El-Serafi IT, Elmasry M, Steinvall I, Sjöberg F (2017) Skin regeneration in three dimensions, current status, challenges and opportunities. Differentiation 96:26–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2017.06.002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Ng WL, Wang S, Yeong WY, Naing MW (2016) Skin bioprinting: impending reality or fantasy? Trends Biotechnol 34:689–699.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Tarassoli SP, Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Gao N, Whitaker S, Doak S, Whitaker IS (2018) Skin tissue engineering using 3D bioprinting: an evolving research field. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71:615–623.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.12.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Vidal Yucha SE, Tamamoto KA, Nguyen H, Cairns DM, Kaplan DL (2019) Human skin equivalents demonstrate need for neuro-immuno-cutaneous system. Adv Biosyst 3:1800283.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.201800283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Adams SD, Ashok A, Kanwar RK, Kanwar JR, Kouzani AZ (2017) Integrated 3D printed scaffolds and electrical stimulation for enhancing primary human cardiomyocyte cultures. Bioprinting 6:18–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2017.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Gaebel R, Ma N, Liu J, Guan J, Koch L, Klopsch C, Gruene M, Toelk A, Wang W, Mark P, Wang F, Chichkov B, Li W, Steinhoff G (2011) Patterning human stem cells and endothelial cells with laser printing for cardiac regeneration. Biomaterials 32:9218–9230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Izadifar M, Chapman D, Babyn P, Chen X, Kelly ME (2018) UV-assisted 3D bioprinting of nanoreinforced hybrid cardiac patch for myocardial tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 24:74–88.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Jang J, Park H-J, Kim S-W, Kim H, Park JY, Na SJ, Kim HJ, Park MN, Choi SH, Park SH, Kim SW, Kwon S-M, Kim P-J, Cho D-W (2017) 3D printed complex tissue construct using stem cell-laden decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks for cardiac repair. Biomaterials 112:264–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Liu J, He J, Liu J, Ma X, Chen Q, Lawrence N, Zhu W, Xu Y, Chen S (2019) Rapid 3D bioprinting of in vitro cardiac tissue models using human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Bioprinting 13:e00040.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00040CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Ong CS, Fukunishi T, Zhang H, Huang CY, Nashed A, Blazeski A, DiSilvestre D, Vricella L, Conte J, Tung L, Tomaselli GF, Hibino N (2017) Biomaterial-free three-dimensional bioprinting of cardiac tissue using human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes. Sci Rep 7:4566.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05018-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Wang Z, Lee SJ, Cheng H-J, Yoo JJ, Atala A (2018) 3D bioprinted functional and contractile cardiac tissue constructs. Acta Biomater 70:48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Choi Y-J, Jun Y-J, Kim DY, Yi H-G, Chae S-H, Kang J, Lee J, Gao G, Kong J-S, Jang J, Chung WK, Rhie J-W, Cho D-W (2019) A 3D cell printed muscle construct with tissue-derived bioink for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Biomaterials 206:160–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Costantini M, Testa S, Mozetic P, Barbetta A, Fuoco C, Fornetti E, Tamiro F, Bernardini S, Jaroszewicz J, Święszkowski W, Trombetta M, Castagnoli L, Seliktar D, Garstecki P, Cesareni G, Cannata S, Rainer A, Gargioli C (2017) Microfluidic-enhanced 3D bioprinting of aligned myoblast-laden hydrogels leads to functionally organized myofibers in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 131:98–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Mondschein RJ, Kanitkar A, Williams CB, Verbridge SS, Long TE (2017) Polymer structure-property requirements for stereolithographic 3D printing of soft tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 140:170–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Pati F, Ha D-H, Jang J, Han HH, Rhie J-W, Cho D-W (2015) Biomimetic 3D tissue printing for soft tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 62:164–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Grix T, Ruppelt A, Thomas A, Amler A-K, Noichl B, Lauster R, Kloke L (2018) Bioprinting perfusion-enabled liver equivalents for advanced organ-on-a-chip applications. Genes 9:176.  https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9040176CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Hiller T, Berg J, Elomaa L, Röhrs V, Ullah I, Schaar K, Dietrich A-C, Al-Zeer M, Kurtz A, Hocke A, Hippenstiel S, Fechner H, Weinhart M, Kurreck J (2018) Generation of a 3D liver model comprising human extracellular matrix in an alginate/gelatin-based bioink by extrusion bioprinting for infection and transduction studies. Int J Mol Sci 19:3129.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103129CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Imamura T, Shimamura M, Ogawa T, Minagawa T, Nagai T, Silwal Gautam S, Ishizuka O (2018) Biofabricated structures reconstruct functional urinary bladders in radiation-injured rat bladders. Tissue Eng Part A 24:1574–1587.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ (2018) 3D bioprinting of a corneal stroma equivalent. Exp Eye Res 173:188–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2018.05.010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Kang K, Kim Y, Jeon H, Lee SB, Kim JS, Park SA, Kim WD, Yang HM, Kim SJ, Jeong J, Choi D (2018) Three-dimensional bioprinting of hepatic structures with directly converted hepatocyte-like cells. Tissue Eng Part A 24:576–583.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Kim KW, Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim JC (2018) Ex vivo functionality of 3D bioprinted corneal endothelium engineered with ribonuclease 5-overexpressing human corneal endothelial cells. Adv Healthc Mater 7:1800398.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Madden LR, Nguyen TV, Garcia-Mojica S, Shah V, Le AV, Peier A, Visconti R, Parker EM, Presnell SC, Nguyen DG, Retting KN (2018) Bioprinted 3D primary human intestinal tissues model aspects of native physiology and ADME/Tox functions. iScience 2:156–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.03.015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Shi P, Tan YSE, Yeong WY, Li HY, Laude A (2018) A bilayer photoreceptor-retinal tissue model with gradient cell density design: a study of microvalve-based bioprinting. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12:1297–1306.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Sorkio A, Koch L, Koivusalo L, Deiwick A, Miettinen S, Chichkov B, Skottman H (2018) Human stem cell based corneal tissue mimicking structures using laser-assisted 3D bioprinting and functional bioinks. Biomaterials 171:57–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bengi Yilmaz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aydin Tahmasebifar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Erkan Türker Baran
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Tissue EngineeringUniversity of Health SciencesIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Institute of Health Sciences, Department of BiomaterialsUniversity of Health SciencesIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations