Advertisement

The Statemate Verification Environment

Making It Real
  • Tom Bienmüller
  • Werner Damm
  • Hartmut Wittke
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1855)

Abstract

The Statemate Verification Environment supports requirement analysis and specification development of embedded controllers as part of the Statemate product offering of I-Logix, Inc. This paper discusses key enhancements of the prototype tool reported in [2,5] in order to enable full scale industrial usage of the tool-set. It thus reports on a successfully completed technology transfer from a prototype tool-set to a commercial offering. The discussed enhancements are substantiated with performance results all taken from real industrial applications of leading companies in automotive and avionics.

References

  1. 1.
    Bienmüller, T., Bohn, J., Brinkmann, H., Brockmeyer, U., Damm, W., Hungar, H., Jansen, P.: Verification of automotive control units. In: Olderog, E.-R., Steffen, B. (eds.) Correct System Design. LNCS, vol. 1710, pp. 319–341. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bienmüller, T., Brockmeyer, U., Damm, W., Döhmen, G., Eßmann, C., Holberg, H.J., Hungar, H., Josko, B., Schlör, R., Wittich, G., Wittke, H., Clements, G., Rowlands, J., Sefton, E.: Formal Verification of an AvionicsApplication using Abstraction and Symbolic Model Checking. In: Redmill, F., Anderson, T. (eds.) Towards System Safety – Proceedings of the Seventh Safety-critical Systems Symposium, Huntingdon, UK. Safety-Critical Systems Club, pp. 150–173. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohn, J., Brockmeyer, U., Essmann, C., Hungar, H.: SMI – system modeling interface, draft version 0.1. Technical report, Kuratorium OFFIS, e.V., Oldenburg (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brockmeyer, U.: Verifikation von Statemate Designs. PhD thesis, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (December 1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brockmeyer, U., Wittich, G.: Tamagotchis Need Not Die – Verification of STATEMATE Designs. In: Steffen, B. (ed.) TACAS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1384, pp. 217–231. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Hamaguchi, K.: Another Look at LTL Model Checking. Formal Methods in System Design 10(1), 47–71 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Damm, W., Brockmeyer, U., Holberg, H.-J., Wittich, G., Eckrich, M.: Einsatz formaler Methoden zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit eingebetteter Systeme im KFZ, VDI/VW Gemeinschaftstagung (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damm, W., Harel, D.: LSCs: Breathing Life into Message Sequence Charts. In: FMOODS 1999 IFIP TC6/WG6.1 Third International Conference on Formal Methods for Open Object-Based Distributed Systems (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feyeraband, K., Josko, B.: A visual formalism for real time requirement specifications. In: Rus, T., Bertrán, M. (eds.) AMAST-ARTS 1997, ARTS 1997, and AMAST-WS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1231, pp. 156–168. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Filkorn, T.: Applications on Formal Verification in Industrial Automation and Telecommunication. In: Workshop on Formal Design of Safety Critical Embedded Systems (April 1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The VIS Group. VIS: A System for Verification and Synthesis. In: Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) CAV 1996. LNCS, vol. 1102. Springer, Heidelberg (1996), VIS 1.3 is available from the VIS home-page: http://www-cad.eecs.Berkeley.EDU/~vis
  12. 12.
    Harel, D., Naamad, A.: The STATEMATE semantics of statecharts. Technical Report CS95-31, TheWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffmann, J., Holberg, H.-J., Schlör, R.: Industrieller Einsatz formaler Verifikationsmethoden (February 2000); To appear in ITG/GI/GMM-Workshop Methoden und Beschreibungssprachen zur Modellierung und Verifikation von Schaltungen und Systemen, Frankfurt/MainGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mikk, E., Lakhnech, Y., Siegel, M.: Hierarchical automata as model for statecharts. In: Shyamasundar, R.K. (ed.) ASIAN 1997. LNCS, vol. 1345. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mikk, E., Lakhnech, Y., Siegel, M.: Towards Efficient Modelchecking Statecharts: A Statecharts to Promela Compiler (April 1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pilarski, F.: Cost effectiveness of formal methods in the development of avionics systems at Aerospatiale. In: 17th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Seattle, WA. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Somenzi, F.: CU Decision Diagram Package (1998), CUDD 2.3.0 is available from http://vlsi.Colorado.EDU/~fabio

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Bienmüller
    • 1
  • Werner Damm
    • 2
  • Hartmut Wittke
    • 2
  1. 1.Carl von Ossietzky UniversityOldenburgGermany
  2. 2.OFFISOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations