Total Dependability Management

  • Per Anders Akersten
  • Bengt Klefsjö
Chapter

31.5 Conclusions

The authors strongly believe that the system view of dependability management will facilitate organizations to work with dependability matters, since things are “put together to create a whole”. Total dependability management builds upon the availability and use of all three management system components: a set of supporting core values, an appropriate methodology, and the skillful use of contextually adapted tools.

Keywords

Quality Function Deployment Total Quality Management Dependability Management International Electrotechnical Commission Safety Management System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    IEC Standard 60300-1. Dependability management. Part 1. Dependability programme management. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1993.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    IEC Standard 60300-2. Dependability management. Part 2. Dependability programme elements. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1995.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    IEC Standard 60300-3-1. Dependability management. Part 3. Application guide. Section 1. Analysis techniques for dependability: guide on methodology. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1991.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hellsten U. The Springboard-a TQM-based tool for self-assessment. Licentiate Thesis 1997: No. 42. Division of Quality Technology & Statistics, Luleå University of Technology; 1997.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bergman B, Klefsjö B. Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction. London: McGraw-Hill and Lund, Studentlitteratur; 1994.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Deming WE. The new economics for industry, government, education; 2nd Edition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Studies; 1994.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Stamatis DH. Failure mode and effects analysis. FMEA from theory to execution. Milwaukee: ASQ Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Akao Y. Quality Function Deployment. Integrating customer requirements into product design. Cambridge: Productivity Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Slabey WR. In: The Second Symposium on Quality Function Deployment/QPC, Automotive Division-ASQC and the American Supplier Institute, Novi, MI; 1990: 21–86.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    IEC Standard 60300-3-9. Dependability management. Part 3. Application guide. Section 9. Risk analysis of technological systems. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1995.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Anderson RT, Neri L. Reliability-centered maintenance. Management and engineering methods. London: Elsevier Applied Science; 1990.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Bird FE, Germain GL. Practical loss control leadership; Revised Edition. Loganville: Det Norske Veritas (USA); 1996.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Dahlgaard JJ, Kristensen K, Kanji GK. The quality journey: a journey without an end. Abingdon: Carfax Publishing Company; 1994.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Oakland JS. Total quality management. The route to improving performance; 2nd Edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Tenner AR, DeToro IJ. Total Quality Management: three steps to continuous improvement. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1992.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Hellsten U, Klefsjö B. TQM as a management system consisting of values, techniques and tools. TQM Magazine, 2000:12, 238–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per Anders Akersten
  • Bengt Klefsjö

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations