Introduction

  • Naomi S. Baron
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW, volume 31)

Keywords

Mobile Phone Text Message Information Communication Technology Instant Messaging Heighten Appreciation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

19.1 References

  1. Androutsopoulos, J. and Schmidt, G. (2002) SMS-Kommunikation: Etnografische Gattungsanalyse am Beispeil einer Kleingruppe. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 36, 49–80.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, N.S. (2004) See you online: gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  3. Doering, N. (2002) ‘Kurzm.wird gesendet’ — Abkürzungen und Akronyme in der SMS-Kommunikation. Muttersprache. Vierteljahresschrift für Deutsche Sprache, Heft 2.Google Scholar
  4. Fortunati, L., Katz, J.E. and Riccini, R. (eds) (2003) Mediating the Human Body: Technology, Communication, and Fashion. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. Hård af Segerstad, Y. (2002) Use and adaptation of written language to the conditions of computer-mediated communication. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
  6. Herring, S. (2002) Computer-mediated communication and the Internet. In Cronin, B. (ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36. American Society for Information Science and Technology, Medford, NJ, pp. 109–168.Google Scholar
  7. Labov, W. (1991) The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2, 205–254.Google Scholar
  8. Ling, R. (2004) The Mobile Connection:the Cell Phone’s Impact on Society. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  9. National Center for Educational Statistics (2002) The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2002. National Assessment of Educational Progress. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Schlobinski, P., Fortmann, N., Gross, O., Hogg, F., Horstmann, F. and Theel, R. (2001) Simsen: Eine Pilotstudie zu sprachlichen und kommunikativen Aspekten in der SMS-Kommunikation. Networx Nr. 22, Hannover.Google Scholar
  11. Silverstone, R. and Haddon, L. (1996) Design and domestication of information communication technologies: technical change and everyday life. In Silverstone, R. and Mansell, R. (eds), Communication by Design: the Politics of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 44–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naomi S. Baron
    • 1
  1. 1.American UniversityWashington, DC

Personalised recommendations