Does Personality Affect Peoples’ Attitude Towards Mobile Phone Use in Public Places?

  • Steve Love
  • Joanne Kewley
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW, volume 31)


Mobile Phone Personality Trait Mobile Communication Public Place Personal Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

18.6 References

  1. Argyle, M., Furnham, A. and Graham, J.A. (1981) Social Situations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. BT Cellnet (2001) Mobile etiquette: changing the way we use our mobiles [online].;accessed 15 October 2001.Google Scholar
  3. Burns, T. (1992) Erving Goffman. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  4. Digman, J.M. (1990) Personality structure: emergence of the five factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
  5. Eysenck, H.J. (1978) Superfactors P,E and N in a comprehensive factor space. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 13, 475–482; cited in Eysenck, H.J. and Eysenck, M.W. (1992). Personality and Individual Differences. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Fiske, S. (1995) Social cognition. In Tesser, A. (ed.), Advanced Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp.149–194.Google Scholar
  7. Gifford, R. (1987) Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice. Allyn, Boston.Google Scholar
  8. Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, E.T. (1966) The Hidden Dimension: Man’s Use of Space in Public and Private. London, Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  10. Harper, R., Randall, D. and Rouncefield, M. (2000) Organisational Change and Retail Finance: an Ethnographic Perspective. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  11. Kaya, N. and Erkíp, F. (1999) Invasion of personal space under the condition of short-term crowding: a case study on an automatic teller machine. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ling, R. (1997) ’One can talk about common manners’!: the use of mobile telephones in inappropriate situations. In Haddon, L. (ed.), Themes in Mobile Telephony. Final Report of the COST 248 Home and Work Group.Google Scholar
  13. Love, S. (2001) Space invaders: do mobile phone conversations invade peoples’ personal space?. In Proceedings of the18th International Human Factors in Telecommunications Symposium, Bergen, 5-7 November 2001, pp.125–131.Google Scholar
  14. Love, S. and Kewley, J. (2002) Does personality affect peoples’ attitude towards mobile phone conversations in public places? In Proceedings of the 3rd Wireless World Conference, University of Surrey, 17-18 July 2002, pp.205–218.Google Scholar
  15. Martin, D. and Bowers, J. (1999) Informing collaborative information visualisation through an ethnography of ambulance control. In Bodker, S., Kyng, M.and Schmidt, K. (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work, Copenhagen, 12-16 September 1999, pp.311–330.Google Scholar
  16. Meyrowitz, J. (1985) No Sense of Place: the Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Morgan, K., Morris, R.L., Macleod, H. and Gibbs, S. (1992) Experiment III: comparing the performance and preferences of naive computer users on functionally equivalent graphical computer interfaces and command line interfaces. Presented at the 6th International Conference on Systems Research, Informatics and Cybernetics, August 1992, Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
  18. Murtagh, G. (2000) Seeing the “rules”: preliminary observations of action, interaction and mobile phone use. In Brown, B., Green, N. and Harper, R. (eds), Wireless World:Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age. Springer, London.Google Scholar
  19. Palen, L., Salzman, M. and Youngs, E.(2000) Going wireless: behaviour and practice of new mobile phone users. In Proceeding of the ACM 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Philadelphia,PA.ACM Press, New York, pp.201–210.Google Scholar
  20. Sears, O.D., Peplau, A. and Freedman, J. (1988) Social Psychology. Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Veitch, R. and Arkkelin, D. (1995) Environmental Psychology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Watson, O.M. and Graves, T.D. (1966) Quantitative research in proxemic behaviour. American Anthropology, 68, 971–985;. cited in Eysenck, M.W. (2000) Psychology: a Student’s Handbook. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wei, R. and Leung, L. (1999) Blurring public and private behaviours in public space: policy challenges in the use and improper use of the cell phone. Telematics and Informatics, 16, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wollman, N., Kelly, B.M. and Bordens, K.S. (1994) Environmental and intrapersonalpredictors of reactions to potential territorial intrusions in the workplace. Environment and Behaviour, 26, 179–194.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Love
    • 1
  • Joanne Kewley
  1. 1.School of Information Systems, Computing and MathematicsBrunel UniversityWest LondonUK

Personalised recommendations