The Effects of Timing and Collaboration on Dependability in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

  • Gordon D. Baxter
  • Juliana Küster Filipre
  • Angela Miguel
  • Kenneth Tan
Conference paper


Computer-based systems are now routinely deployed in many complex dynamic domains, such as aviation and industrial process control. The critical nature of these systems means that their operators rely on them to do the right thing at the right time when called upon. In other words, they are expected to have a high level of what Laprie (1995) defines as dependability. To date dependability research has largely focused on developing techniques for improving the dependability of hardware and software in safety critical applications (e.g., Leveson, 1995). Dependability, however, is a property of the whole socio-technical system: people, computers and context. It is therefore important not only to understand these components, but also how the interactions between them affect dependability.


Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Timing Issue Verbal Communication Ventilator Setting Ward Round 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alberdi, E., Becher, J.-C, Gilhooly, K., Hunter, J., Logie, R., Lyon, A., McIntosh, N., & Reiss, J. (2001). Expertise and the interpretation of computerised physiological data: Implications for the design of medical decision support in neonatal intensive care. International Journal of Human-Computer Systems, 55(3), 191–216.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baecker, R. M., & Buxton, W. A. S. (Eds.). (1987). Readings in human-computer interaction: A multidisciplinary approach. Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  3. Baecker, R. M., Grudin, J., Buxton, W. A. S., & Greenberg, S. (Eds.). (1995). Readings in human-computer interaction: Toward the year 2000. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  4. Bardram, J. E. (1998). Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 89–98). Seattle, WA: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartholomew, K., Newell, S., Dear, P., & Brownlee, K. (1994). Babylog 8000-Flow wave and volume monitoring. Lübeck, Germany: Drägerwerk AG.Google Scholar
  6. Baxter, G. D., Monk, A. F., Tan, K., Dear, P. R. F., & Newell, S. J. (Submitted). Using cognitive task analysis to identify requirements for the successful deployment of decision support systems in neonatal intensive care. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, M. (2001). Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coiera, E. (1999). The impact of culture on technology: How do we create a clinical culture of innovation? Medical Journal of Australia, 171, 508–9.Google Scholar
  9. Coiera, E., & Toombs, V. (1998). Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study. BMJ, 316, 673–676.Google Scholar
  10. Combi, C, & Shuhar, Y. (1997). Temporal reasoning and temporal data maintenance in medicine: Issues and challenges. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 27(5), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewsbury, G., Sommerville, I., Clarke, K., & Rouncefield, M. (2003). A dependability model for domestic systems, Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability and Security (SAFECOMP’03). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, C, & Gray, P. (1996). Temporal aspects of usability. SigCHI Bulletin, 28(2), 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klein, G., Calderwood, R., & MacGregor, D. (1989). Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 19, 462–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laprie, J.-C. (1995). Dependable computing: Concepts, limits, challenges. Paper presented at the 25th IEEE International symposium on fault-tolerant computing, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Leveson, N. (1995). Safeware: System safety and computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  17. Miksch, S., Seyfang, A., Horn, W., & Popow, C. (1999). Abstracting steady qualitative descriptions over time from noisy, high-frequency data. In W. Horn, Y. Shuhar, G. Lindberg, S. Andreassen, & J. Wyatt (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Joint European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Medical Decision Making, AIMDM’99, Aalborg, Denmark, June 1999, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1620. (pp. 281–290). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Monk, A. F. (1998). Lightweight techniques to encourage innovative user interface design. In L. Wood (Ed.), User interface design: bridging the gap between user requirements and design (pp. 109–129). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  19. Philips. (2001).Trendcare continuous blood gas monitoring system: Technical Overview. Böblingen, Germany: Philips Medical Systems.Google Scholar
  20. Rennie, J. M., & Roberton, N. R. C. (2002). Neonatal Intensive Care. (4th ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  21. Snowden, S., Brownlee, K. G., & Dear, P. R. (1997). An expert system to assist neonatal intensive care. Journal of medical engineering technology, 21(2), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tan, K., Baxter, G., Brownlee, K. G., Newell, S. J., Dear, P. R. F., & Smye, S. (2003). Fuzzy logic expert system for ventilation of the newborn infant. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 88(Supplement 1), A47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon D. Baxter
    • 1
  • Juliana Küster Filipre
    • 2
  • Angela Miguel
    • 3
  • Kenneth Tan
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.School of InformaticsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  4. 4.Department of PaediatricsSt James’s University HospitalLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations