Embracing Information as Concept and Practice

  • Robert Stephens
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 143)

Abstract

In this position paper it is argued that generic theories of the information concept will be an obstacle to the Information Systems discipline assuming intellectual leadership of the information portfolio associated with the growth of computing technologies beyond the organization.

Keywords

Information information systems 

References

  1. Agre, P. E. “Institutional Circuitry: Thinking About the Forms and Uses of Information,” Information Technology and Libraries (14:4), 1995, pp. 225–230.Google Scholar
  2. Avison, D., and Fitzgerald, G. Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. Berners-Lee, T., and Fischetti, M. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by Its Inventor, San Francisco: Harper, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. Castel, F. “Ontological Computing,” Communications of the ACM (45:2), 2002, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume 1: The Rise of the Network Society, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Gray, J. “The End of Career,” Communications of the ACM(44:11), 2001, pp. 65–69.Google Scholar
  7. Guarino, N. “Formal Ontology, Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (42), 1995, pp. 625–640.Google Scholar
  8. Hobart, M. E., and Schiffman, Z. S. Information Ages: Literacy, Numeracy and the Computer Revolution, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. Johns, A. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making, London: University of Chicago Press, 1998Google Scholar
  10. Nunberg, G. The Future of the Book, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. Seely Brown, J., and Duguid, P. The Social Life of Information, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. Stephens, R. A. “Problems with a Theoretical Attitude to the Information Concept,”in D. Strong and D. Straub (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7 th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, 2001, pp. 1963–1967.Google Scholar
  13. Stephens, R. A. and Probert, S. K. “Authentic Intervention in Information Systems Practice,” in H. R. Hansen, M. Bichler, and H. Mahrer (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, Vienna, July 2000, pp. 64–70.Google Scholar
  14. Suchman, L. A. “Supporting Articulation Work,” in R Kling (Ed.), Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices (2 nd ed.), San Diego: Academic Press, 1996, pp. 407–423.Google Scholar
  15. Walsham, G. Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context, Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Wastell, D. G. “The Fetish of Technique: Methodology as a Social Defence,” Information Systems Journal (6), 1995, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
  17. Willcocks, L. P., and Lester, S. (Eds.). Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell, 1953.Google Scholar
  19. Wood, D. The Power of Maps, London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. Zuboff, S. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power, Oxford: Heinemann, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Stephens
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the West of EnglandEngland

Personalised recommendations