Software for the Changing E-Business

  • Maria Alaranta
  • Tuomas Valtonen
  • Jouni Isoaho
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 139)


In this article, we first acknowledge the requirements for more rapid and cost-efficient development cycles and systems evolution for e-business software applications. Thereafter, we discuss the contemporary solutions used to meet the requirements. These include technological and organizational innovations, as well as commoditization. After that, we discuss attributes of an e-business application, i.e. the depth of modification, the sophistication of the modification method, operational continuity, and freedom from errors. These attributes are combined into a framework that is then used to evaluate four common e-commerce applications, a spreadsheet application and a novel dynamic e-commerce platform, also presented in this article. The dynamic e-commerce platform is proposed to be the most favorable solution in cases where system specifications change frequently.

Key words

e-commerce information system modification flexibility 


  1. 1.
    Behling, Robert — Behling, Cris — Sousa, Kenneth (1996) Software Re-engineering: Concepts and Methodology in Industrial Management & Data Systems Vol. 96, No. 6, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blackburn, Joseph D. — Scudder, Gary D. — Wassenhove, Luk N. — Hill, Graig (1996) Time-based Software Development in Integrated Manufacturing Systems Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 60–66.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dubé, Line (1998) Teams in Packaged Software Development — the Software Corp. Experience in Information Technology & People. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 36–61.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gong, Beilan — Yen, David C. — Chou, David C. (1998) A Manager’s Guide to Total Quality Software Design in Industrial Management & Data Systems Vol. 98, No. 3. pp. 100–107.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Herzwurm, Georg — Schockert, Sixten (2003) The Leading Edge in QFD for Software and Electronic Business in Int’l Journal of Quality & Reliability Management Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 36–55.Google Scholar
  6. 6. (2002) (Read: 04/30/03).
  7. 7.
    Paulk, Mark C. — Weber, Charles V. — Garcia, Suzanne M. — Chrissis, Mary Beth — Bush, Marilyn (1993) Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model, version 1.1. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegio Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paulk, Mark C. (2001) Extreme Programming from a CMM Perspective in IEEE Software. Nov/Dec, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quintas, Paul (1994) Programmed Innovation? Trajectories of Change in Software Development in Information Technology & People. Vol. 7 No.1, pp. 25–47.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ratnasingam, Pauline (2002) The importance of technology trust in Web services security in Information Management & Computer Security. Vol. 10, No.5, pp. 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadeh, Tamar — Walker, Jenny (2003) Library Portals: Toward the semantic Web in New Library World. Vol. 104, No. 1184/1185, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saksan Pankit Yhdistyvät (2000) in Verkkouutiset (Read: 04/28/03).
  13. 13.
    Siegel, Jon et al. (2001) Developing In OMG’s Model-Driven Architecture at (Read: 07/15/03).
  14. 14.
    Supply Chain Management (SCM) Definition (2003) (Read: 04/28/03).
  15. 15.
    Yang, Y Helio (2001) Software Quality Management and ISO 9000 Implementation in Industrial Management & Data Systems. Vol. 101, No. 7, pp. 329–338.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Alaranta
  • Tuomas Valtonen
  • Jouni Isoaho

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations