Agent Technology

  • Vladimír Mařík
  • Michal Pěchouček


A brief overview of current stat-of-the-art of the agent technology is provided. Principle concepts and architectures of agent-based solutions are presented. Basic information on available platforms, standards and ontology structures is summarized. Appropriate techniques that can be immediately used in the area of virtual enterprises are stressed. FIPA standardization efforts are highlighted.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beneventano, D., at al.: The MOMIS Approach to Information Integration. Proc. of Int. Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Setubal, Porugal, 2001, pp. 194–198Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bredshaw J. M., et. al.: Making Agents Acceptable to People. In Handbook of Intelligent Information Technology, IOS Press, Amsterdam 2003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: The Virtual Enterprise Concept. In: Infrastructures for Virtual Enterprises, Kluwer Academic Publ., 1999, pp. 3–14Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DAML — Darpa Agent Markup Language website,
  5. 5.
    Decker, K., Sycara, K., Williamson, M.: Middle Agents for Internet. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 97, Japan, 1997Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deen, M.: Holonic Manufacturing Systems. Springer Verlag, London, 2003Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dieter Fensel, I. Horrocks, F. Van Harmelen, S. Decker, M. Erdmann and M. Klein. OIL in a Nutshell. Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling, and Management (EKAW’00). 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Filipe J., Cordeiro, J.: Organizational Semiotics: A Normative Agent-Based Approach to VE Modelling. Submitted to PROVE’03Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., McEntire, R.: KQML as an Agent Communication Language. In: Proc, of 3rd Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management CIKM’94, ACM Press, 1994Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luck, M., McBurney, P., Preist Ch.: Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing. Agentlink II, U.K., 2003Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michael R. Genesereth and Richard E. Fikes. Knowledge Interchange Format, Version 3.0, Reference Manual. 1994.
  12. 12.
    Thomas R. Gruber. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition. 5.1993.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    James Hendler. Ontologies on the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems. March/April. 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daniel E. O’Leary. Different Firms, Different Ontologies, and No One Best Ontology. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stuart E. Madnick. From VLDB to VMLDB (Very MANY Large Data Bases): Dealing with Large-Scale Semantic Heterogeneity. Proc. of the 21st VLDB Conference. 1995.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maes, P.: Computational Reflection. Technical Report 87-2, Free University of Brussels, AI Lab, 1987Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mařík V., Pěchouček M., Štěpánková O., Lažanský J. (2000) “ProPlanT: Multi-Agent System for Production Planning”, International Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence. 2000, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 727–760Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mařík V., Pěchouček M., Štěpánková O.: Social Knowledge in Multi-Agent Systems, In: Multi-Agent Systems and Applications, LNAI 2086, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001, pp.211–245Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McGuire, J., Kuokka, D., Weber, J., Tenebaum, J., Gruber, T., Olsen, G.: SHADE: Technology for Knowledge-Based Collaborative Engineering. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 1(3), 1993Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Novák, P., Rollo, M., Hodík, J., Vlček, T.: Communication Security in Multi-Agent Systems. In: Multi-Agent Systems and Applications III, LNAI No. 2691, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2003Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park, J.Y., Gennari, J.H., Musen, M.A.: Mappings for Reuse in Knowledge-based Systems. Proc. of the 11th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling and Management, Banff, Canada, 1998Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pěchouček M., Mařík V., Štěpánková O. Towards Reducing Communication Traffic In Multi-Agent Systems, Special Issue on Virtual Organizations and E-Commerce Applications, Journal of Applied System Studies, Cambridge International Science, Cambridge, UK, Spring, 2001Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pěchouček M., Mařík V., Bárta, J.: A Knowledge-based Approach to Coalition Formation. IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 17, no.3, 2002, pp. 17–25Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sandholm W. T.: Distributed Rational Decision Making, In Multi-Agent Systems: Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence (Weiss G., ed.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shehory, O., Kraus S.: Methods for Task Allocation via Agent Coalition Formation. Artificial Intelligence Journal, vol. 101 (1–2), 1998, pp. 165–200MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shen, W., Norrie, D.H., Barthes, J.A.: Multi-Agent Systems for Concurrent Intelligent Design and Manufacturing, Taylor and Francis, London, 2001Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1969Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hiroki Suguri et all. Implementation of FIPA Ontology Service. Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems, 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sycara, K.: Multi-Agent Infrastructure, Agent Discovery, Middle Agents for Web Services and Interoperation. In: Multi-Agent Systems and Applications, LNAI No. 2068, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001, pp. 17–49Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith, R.: The Contract Net Protocol: High-level Communication and Control in Distributed Problem Solver. IEEE Trans. on Computers, 1980, 29(12):1104–1113Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vrba, P.: JAVA-based Agent Platforms Evaluation. In: Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems for Manufacturing, LNAI No. 2724, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2003, pp.47–58Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tambe, M.: Towards Flexible Teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 7, 1997, pp. 83–124Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wooldridge M.: Reasoning about rational agents, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimír Mařík
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michal Pěchouček
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CyberneticsCzech Technical University in PragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Rockwell Automation Research CenterPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations