A Convergence of Experimental and Theoretical Breakthroughs Affirms the PM theory of Dynamically Structured Cell Water on the Theory’s 40th Birthday

  • Gilbert N. Ling

Abstract

This review begins with a summary of the critical evidence disproving the traditional membrane theory and its modification, the membrane-pump theory – as well as their underlying postulations of (1) free cell water, (2) free cell K+, and (3) ‘native’-proteins being truly native.

Next, the essence of the unifying association-induction hypothesis is described, starting with the re-introduction of the concept of protoplasm (and of colloid) under a new definition. Protoplasms represent diverse cooperative assemblies of protein-water-ion – maintained with ATP and helpers – at a high-(negative)-energy-low-entropy state called the resting living state. Removal of ATP could trigger its auto-cooperative transition into the low-(negative)-energy-high-entropy active living state or death state.

As the largest component of protoplasm, cell water in the resting living state exists as polarized-oriented multilayers on arrays of some fully extended protein chains. Each of these fully extended protein chains carries at proper distance apart alternatingly negatively charged backbone carbonyl groups (as N sites) and positively charged backbone imino group (as P sites) in what is called a NP-NP-NP system of living protoplasm. In contrast, a checkerboard of alternating N and P sites on the surface of salt crystals is called a NP surface.

The review describes how eight physiological attributes of living protoplasm were duplicated by positive model (extroverts) systems but not duplicated or weakly duplicated by negative model (introverts) systems. The review then goes into more focused discussion on (1) water vapor sorption at near saturation vapor pressure and on (2) solute exclusion. Both offer model-independent quantitative data on polarized-oriented water.

Water-vapor sorption at physiological vapor pressure (p/p_o = 0.996) of living frog muscle cells was shown to match quantitatively vapor sorption of model systems containing exclusively or nearly exclusively fully extended polypeptide (e.g., polyglycine, polyglycine-D,L-alanine) or equivalent (e.g., PEO, PEG, PVP). The new Null-Point Method of Ling and Hu made studies at this extremely high vapor pressure easily feasible.

Solute exclusion in living cells and model systems is the next subject reviewed in some detail, centering around Ling’s 1993 quantitative theory of solute distribution in polarized-oriented water. It is shown that the theory correctly predicts size dependency of the q-values of molecules as small as water to molecules as large as raffinose. But this is true only in cases where the excess water-to-water interaction energy is high enough as in living frog muscle (e.g., 126 cal/mole) and in water dominated by the more powerful extrovert models (e.g., gelatin, NaOH-denatured hemoglobin, PEO.) However, when the probe solute molecule is very large in size (e.g., PEG 4000), even water ‘dominated’ by the weaker introvert model (e.g., native hemoglobin) shows exclusion.

Zheng and Pollack recently demonstrated the exclusion of coated latex microspheres 0.1 μ m in diameter from water 100 μ m (and thus some 300,000 water molcules) away from the polarizing surface of a poly(vinylalcohol) (PVA) gel. This finding again affirms the PM theory in a spectacular fashion. Yet at the time of its publication, it had no clear-cut theoretical foundation based on known laws of physics that could explain such a remote action.

It was therefore with great joy to announce at the June 2004 Gordon Conference on Interfacial Water, the most recent introduction of a new theoretical foundation for the long range water polarization-orientation. To wit, under ideal conditions an ‘idealized NP surface’ can polarize and orient water ad infinitum. Thus, a theory based on laws of physics can indeed explain long range water polarization and orientation like those shown by Zheng and Pollack.

Under near-ideal conditions, the new theory also predicts that water film between polished surfaces carrying a checkerboard of N and P sites at the correct distance apart would not freeze at any attainable temperature. In fact, Giguère and Harvey confirmed this too retroactively half a century ago

Keywords

water cellwater polarized multilayers association-induction hypothesis AIHypothesis polarized multilayer theory polarized orientedmultilayer theory PM theory long-range water structure water vapor pressure super-cooling non-freezing water silver chloridecrystals glass surface BET theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bamford CH, Elliott A, Hanby WC (1956) Synthetic Polypeptides: Preparation, Structure and Properties. New York: Academic Press, p 310Google Scholar
  2. Beatley EH, Klotz IM (1951) Biol Bull 101:215Google Scholar
  3. Benson SW, Ellis DA, Zwanzig RW (1950) J Amer Chem Soc 72:2102Google Scholar
  4. Best CH, Tatlor NB (1945) The Physical Basis of Medical Practice. 4th edn., Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkens Co., p 7, column 2Google Scholar
  5. de Boer JH, Zwikker C (1929) Zeitschr Phyisk Chem B3:407Google Scholar
  6. de Boer JH, Dippel CJ (1933) Rec Trav Chem Pays-Bas 52:214Google Scholar
  7. Boyle PJ, Conway EJ (1941) J Physiol 100:1Google Scholar
  8. Bradley RS (1936a) J Chem Soc:1467–1474Google Scholar
  9. Bradley RS (1936b) J Chem Soc:1799–1804Google Scholar
  10. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) J Amer Chem Soc 60:369Google Scholar
  11. Bull H (1944) J Amer Chem Soc 66:1499Google Scholar
  12. Cameron IL (1988) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 20:221Google Scholar
  13. Cassie ABD (1945) Trans Farad Soc 41:450Google Scholar
  14. Conway EJ, Creuss-Callaghan G (1937) Biochem J 31:828Google Scholar
  15. Doty P, Gratzer WB (1962) Polyamino Acids, Polypeptides and Proteins. Stahmann MA (ed) Madison: Univ. Wisconsin Press, pp 116–117Google Scholar
  16. Dujardin F (1835) Annales des sciences naturelles; partie zoologique, 4:3642d sèr.Google Scholar
  17. Durant W (1926) The Story of Philosophy. New York: Pocket Books, A Division of Simon and Schuster, reprinted all the way to at least 1961Google Scholar
  18. Eastoe JE (1955) Biochem J 61:58.9Google Scholar
  19. Edelmann L (1977) Physiol Chem Phys 9:313Google Scholar
  20. Edelmann L (1984) Scanning Electron Microscopy. II:875Google Scholar
  21. Edelmann L (1986) Science of Biological Specimen Preparation. Müller M, Becker RP, Boyde A, Wolosewick JJ (eds) Chicago: SEM Inc, AMF O’Hare, p 33Google Scholar
  22. Freedman JC (1976) Biochem Biophys Acta 455:989Google Scholar
  23. Gary-Bobo CM, Lindenberg AB (1969) J Coll Interf Sci 29:702Google Scholar
  24. Giguère PA, Harvey KB (1956) Canad J Chemistry 34:798Google Scholar
  25. Glasstone S (1946) Textbook of Physical Chemistry. 2nd edn., New York: D.van NostrandGoogle Scholar
  26. Graham T (1861) Phil Trans R Soc. London, vol 151, p 183Google Scholar
  27. Grove A (1996) Only the Paranoid Survive. New York: Doubleday Dell PublGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall TS (1969) Ideas of Life and Matter. Chicago: Univ Chicago Press, p 310Google Scholar
  29. Henniker JC (1949) Rev Modern Phys 21:322Google Scholar
  30. Hodgkin AL (1971) The Conduction of the Nervous Impulse. Liverpool: Liverpool Univ. Press, p 21Google Scholar
  31. Hoover SR, Mellon EF (1950) J Amer Chem Soc 72:2562Google Scholar
  32. Hori T (1956) Low Temperature Science. A15:34 (Teion Kagaku, Butsuri Hen) (English translation: No. 62, US Army Snow, Ice and Permafrost Res. Establishment, Corps of Engineers, Wilmette, Ill. USA)Google Scholar
  33. Huang HW, Hunter SH, Warburton VK, Mos SC (1979) Science 204:191Google Scholar
  34. Katchman BJ, McLaren AD (1951) J Amer Chem Soc 73:2124Google Scholar
  35. Katz JR (1919) Koloidchem Beihefte 9:1Google Scholar
  36. Leeder JD, Watt IC (1974) J Coll Interf Sci 48:339Google Scholar
  37. Ling GN (1952) Phosphorous Metabolism (Vol II). McElroy WD, Glass B (eds) Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, p 748Google Scholar
  38. Ling GN (1962) A Physical Theory of the Living State: The Association-Induction Hypothesis. Waltham MA: BlaisdellGoogle Scholar
  39. Ling GN (1965) Ann NY Acad Sci 125:401Google Scholar
  40. Ling GN (1969) Intern Rev Cytol 26:1Google Scholar
  41. Ling GN (1970) Intern J Neurosci 1:129Google Scholar
  42. Ling GN (1972) Water and Aqueous Solutions, Structure, Thermodynamics, and Transport Properties. Horne A (ed) New York: Wiley-Interscience, pp 663–699Google Scholar
  43. Ling GN (1973) Physiol Chem Phys 5:295Google Scholar
  44. Ling GN (1977) Physiol Chem Phys 9:319Google Scholar
  45. Ling GN (1980) Cooperative Phenomena in Biology. Karreman G. (ed) NewYork: Pergamon Press, p 39Google Scholar
  46. Ling GN (1982) Water and Ions in Biological Systems. New York: Plenum Press Pullman A, Vasilescu V, Packer L (eds) pp79-94.(2nd Intern. Conf., Bucharist, Sept. 6-11. In:Google Scholar
  47. Ling GN (1984) In Search of the Physical Basis of Life. New York: Plenum Publ CorpGoogle Scholar
  48. Ling GN (1992) A Revolution in the Physiology of the Living Cell. Malabar FL: Krieger Publ CoGoogle Scholar
  49. Ling GN (1993) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 25:145Google Scholar
  50. Ling GN (1997) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 29:123 Available via http://www.physiological-chemistryandphysics.com/pdf/PCP29-2_ling.pdfGoogle Scholar
  51. Ling GN (2001) Life at the Cell and Below-Cell Level: the Hidden History of a Fundamental Revolution in Biology. New York: Pacific PressGoogle Scholar
  52. Ling GN (2003) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 35:91 Available via http://www.physiological- chemistryandphysics.com/pdf/PCP35-2_ling.pdfGoogle Scholar
  53. Ling GN (2004) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 36:1 Available via http://www.physiological-chemistryandphysics.com/pdf/PCP36-1_ling.pdfGoogle Scholar
  54. Ling GN, Hu WX (2004) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 36:143 Available via http://www. physiologicalchemistryandphysics.com/pdf/PCP36-2_ling_hu.pdfGoogle Scholar
  55. Ling GN, Ochsenfeld MM (1966) J Gen Physiol 49:819Google Scholar
  56. Ling GN, Negendank W (1970) Physiol Chem Phys 2:15Google Scholar
  57. Ling GN, Ochsenfeld MM (1973) Science 181:78Google Scholar
  58. Ling GN, Walton C (1976) Science 191:293Google Scholar
  59. Ling GN, Zhang ZL (1984) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 16:221Google Scholar
  60. Ling GN, Hu WX (1987) Physiol Chem. Phys. & Med. NMR 19:251Google Scholar
  61. Ling GN, Hu WX (1988) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 20:293Google Scholar
  62. Ling GN, Ochsenfeld MM (1989) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 21:19Google Scholar
  63. Ling GN, Ochsenfeld MM, Walton C, Bersinger TJ (1980) Physiol Chem Phys 12:3Google Scholar
  64. Ling GN, Zodda D, Sellers M (1984) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 16:381Google Scholar
  65. Ling GN, Niu Z, Ochsenfeld MM (1993) Physiol Chem Phys & Med NMR 25:177Google Scholar
  66. Lloyd DJ (1933) Biol Rev Cambridge Phil Soc 8:463Google Scholar
  67. Lloyd DJ, Phillips H (1933) Trans Farad Soc, vol 29, p 132Google Scholar
  68. Macalum AB (1905) J Physiol (London) 32:95Google Scholar
  69. McLaren AD, Rowen JW (1951) J Polymer Sci 7:289Google Scholar
  70. Mellon EF, Korn AH, Hoover SR (1948) J Amer Chem Soc 70:3040Google Scholar
  71. Mellon EF, Korn AH, Hoover SR (1949) J Amer Chem Soc 71:2761Google Scholar
  72. Menten ML (1908) Trans Can Inst, vol 8, p 403Google Scholar
  73. Perutz MF, Muirhead H, Cox JM, Goaman LCG, Mathews FS, McGandy EL, Webb LE (1968) Nature 219:29–32Google Scholar
  74. Sponsler OL, Bath JD, Ellis JW (1940) J Phys Chem 44:996Google Scholar
  75. Stirling AH (1912) James Hutchinson Stirling: His Life and Work. London, p 221Google Scholar
  76. Tigyi J, Kallay N, Tigyi-Sebes A, Trombitas K (1980–81) International Cell Biology. Schweiger HG. (ed) Berlin: Springer, p 925Google Scholar
  77. Walter H (1923) Jahrschr Wiss Bot 62:145Google Scholar
  78. von Zglinicki T (1988) Gen Physiol Biophys 7:495Google Scholar
  79. Zheng J, Pollack GH (2003) Phys Rev E68:031408Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert N. Ling
    • 1
  1. 1.Damadian Foundation for Basic and Cancer Research, Tim and Kim Ling Foundation for Basic and Cancer Researchc/o Fonar Corporation110 Marcus DriveNY 11747

Personalised recommendations