Interactive Knowledge-Based Assistance For Conceptual Design of Building Structures

  • Rodrigo Mora
  • Hugues Rivard
  • Steve Parent
  • Claude Bédard
Conference paper
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 140)


During conceptual structural design the engineer proposes initial structural solutions to early architectural designs. At this stage, the decisions made by the engineer are based mostly on knowledge about structural behaviours and experience on the applicability of available construction technologies and materials to different design situations. This research proposes a knowledge-based computer approach to assist the engineer in proposing feasible structural solutions to the architect interactively. With this approach a structural solution is developed by the engineer from an overall description to a specific one through the progressive use of knowledge. A first prototype has been implemented and is being enhanced with a knowledge-base for design exploration. Therefore, an example of envisioned computer support is used to illustrate the capabilities of the proposed approach.


Architectural Model Building Information Model Structural Assembly Rigid Frame Subsystem Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bailey S. and Smith I. (1994). ”Case-based preliminary building design“, ASCE J. of Computing in Civil Engineering, 8(4), 454–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bédard C. and Ravi M. (1991). ”Knowledge-based approach to overall configuration of multistory office buildings“, ASCE J. of Computing in Civil Engineering, 5(4), 336–353.Google Scholar
  3. Eisfeld M. and Scherer R. (2003). ”Assisting conceptual design of building structures by an interactive description logic based planner“, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 17(1), Elsevier, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fenves S.J., Rivard H., and Gomez N. (2000). ”SEED-Config: a tool for conceptual structural design in a collaborative building design environment“, AI in Engineering, 14(1), Elsevier, 233–247.Google Scholar
  5. Gomez N. (1998). Conceptual structural design through knowledge hierarchies. PhD thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  6. Grierson D.E. and Khajehpour S. (2002). ”Method for Conceptual Design Applied to Office Buildings“, ASCE J. of Computing in Civil Engineering, 16, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jain D., Krawinkler H., Law K. (1991). ”Logic-based conceptual structural design of steel office Buildings“, Report No 49, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  8. Khemlani L. (2005). AECbytes product review: Autodesk Revit Structure, Internet URL: Scholar
  9. Kumar B. and Raphael B. (1997). ”CADREM: A Case-based system for conceptual structural design. Engineering with Computers“; 13(3), 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maher M. (1988). ”Expert systems for structural design“, J. of Computing in Civil Engineering; 1(4), 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meyer S. (1995). ”A Description of the structural design of tall buildings through the grammar Paradigm“, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  12. Mora R., Rivard H., Bédard C. (2006A). ”A computer representation to support conceptual structural design within a building architectural context“, ASCE J. of Computing in Civil Engineering, to be published in the March issue.Google Scholar
  13. Mora R., Bédard C., Rivard H. (2006B). ”Geometric modeling and reasoning for the conceptual design of building structures“, submitted for publication at the Journal of Advanced Engineering Informatics, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Rafiq M., Mathews J., Bullock G. (2003). ”Conceptual building design — evolutionary approach“, ASCE J. of Computing in Civil Engineering; 17(3), 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rivard H. and Fenves S.J. (2000). ”A representation for conceptual design of buildings“, ASCE J. of Computing in Civil Engineering, 14(3), 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sacks R., Warszawski A. and Kirsch U. (2000). ”Structural Design in an automated building system“, Automation in Construction, 10(3), Elsevier, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shea K. and Cagan J. (1998). ”The design of novel roof trusses with shape annealing: assessing the ability of a computational method in aiding structural designers with varying design intent“, Design Studies; 20, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sisk G., Miles J., Moore C. (2003). ”Designer centered development of GA-based DSS for conceptual design of buildings“, ASCE J. of Computing in Civil Engineering, 17(3), 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Soibelman L. and Peña-Mora F. (2000). ”Distributed multi-reasoning mechanism to support conceptual structural design“ ASCE J. of Computing in Civil Engineering; 126(6), 733–742.Google Scholar
  20. Solibri Inc. (2005). Solibri Model Checker, Internet URL: public/main/main.php, last visited 6/10/2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodrigo Mora
    • 1
  • Hugues Rivard
    • 1
  • Steve Parent
    • 1
  • Claude Bédard
    • 1
  1. 1.ETSMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations