Why Special Relativity Should Not Be a Template for a Fundamental Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics

  • Harvey R. Brown
  • Christopher G. Timpson

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yuri Balashov and Michel Janssen. Critical notice: Presentism and relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54:327–46, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. John S. Bell. How to teach special relativity. Progress in Scientific Culture, 1, 1976. Reprinted in Bell (1987), pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
  3. John S. Bell. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
  4. John S. Bell. George Francis FitzGerald. Physics World, 5:31–35, 1992. 1989 lecture, abridged by Denis Weare.Google Scholar
  5. Harvey R. Brown. The origins of length contraction: I the FitzGerald-Lorentz deformation hypothesis. American Journal of Physics, 69:1044–1054, 2001. E-prints: arXive:gr-qc/0104032; PITT-PHILSCI 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harvey R. Brown. Einstein’s misgivings about his 1905 formulation of special relativity. European Journal of Physics, 26:S85S90, special Einstein issue, 2005a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harvey R. Brown. Physical relativity: space-time structure from a dynamical perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005b.Google Scholar
  8. Harvey R. Brown and Oliver Pooley. The origins of the spacetime metric: Bell’s Lorentzian pedagogy and its significance in general relativity. In Callender and Huggett (2001), pp. 256–272, 2001. E-print: arXive:gr-qc/9908048.Google Scholar
  9. Harvey R. Brown and Oliver Pooley. Minkowski space-time: a glorious non-entity. To appear in The ontology of spacetime, Dennis Dieks (ed.), Elsevier, 2006. An earlier version appeared in arXive: physics/0403088 and PITT-PHIL-SCI 1661.Google Scholar
  10. Jeffrey Bub. Why the quantum? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35:241–66, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig Callender and Nick Huggett (ed.). Physics meets philosophy at the Planck scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. Rob Clifton, Jeffrey Bub, and Hans Halvorson. Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information theoretic constraints. Foundations of Physics, 33(11):1561, 2003. Page references to arXive: quant-ph/0211089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennis Dieks. The “reality” of the Lorentz contraction. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 15:33–45, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Arthur S. Eddington. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1928.Google Scholar
  15. A. Einstein. Zur elektrodynamik bewegter körper. Annalen der Physik, 17:891–921, 1905.Google Scholar
  16. A. Einstein. Bemerkung zur Notiz des Herrn P. Ehrenfest: Translation deformierbarer Elektronen und der Flächensatz. Annalen der Physik, 23:206–208, 1907. English translation in Einstein (1989), Doc. 44, pp. 236–7.Google Scholar
  17. A. Einstein. What is the theory of relativity? The London Times, 1919. Reprinted in Einstein (1982), pp. 227–32.Google Scholar
  18. A. Einstein. Geometrie und erfahrung. Erweite Fassung des Festvortrages gehalten an der presussischen Akademie Springer: Berlin, 1921. Translated by S. Bargmann as ‘Geometry and Experience’ in Einstein (1982), pp. 232–246.Google Scholar
  19. A. Einstein. Autobiographical notes. In P. A. Schilpp, editor, Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Vol. 1, pages 1–94. Open Court, Illinois, 1969.Google Scholar
  20. A. Einstein. Letter to Arnold Sommerfeld, January 14, 1908. Document 73 in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 5, The Swiss Years: Correspondence, 1902–1914 (English Translation Supplement, M. J. Klein, A. J. Kox and R. Schulmann (eds.), Princeton University Press, Princeton. Translated by A. Beck., 1995.Google Scholar
  21. Peter Galison. Einstein’s Clocks, Poincaré’s Maps. Empires of Time. Hodder and Stoughton, London, 2004.Google Scholar
  22. Hans Halvorson. On information-theoretic characterizations of physical theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35(2):277–93, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Jánossy. Theory of Relativity based on Physical Reality. Akadémie Kiadó, Budapest, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. Joseph Larmor. Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol. I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1929.Google Scholar
  25. Abraham Pais. ‘Subtle is the Lord …’ The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  26. Wolfgang Pauli. Theory of Relativity. Dover, New York, 1981. Originally published as ‘Relativitätstheorie’, Encyklopädie der matematischenWissenschaften, mit Einschluss ihrer Anwendungen vol 5. Physik ed. A. Sommerfeld (Tauber, Leibzig), 1921; pp. 539–775.Google Scholar
  27. W. F. G. Swann. Relativity, the FitzGerald-Lorentz contraction, and quantum theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 13:197–202, 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Christopher G. Timpson. The applicability of the Shannon information in quantum mechanics and Zeilinger’s foundational principle. Philosophy of Science, Supplement: Proceedings of PSA, 70: 1233–44, 2002.Google Scholar
  29. Christopher G. Timpson. On a supposed conceptual inadequacy of the Shannon information in quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33:441–68, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Christopher G. Timpson. Quantum information theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics. D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University, 2004.Google Scholar
  31. Antony Valentini. Universal signature of non-quantum systems. arXive: quant-ph/0309107, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey R. Brown
  • Christopher G. Timpson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations