Structure and dynamics of a benthic invertebrate community in an intertidal area of the tagus estuary, western portugal: a six year data series

  • Gilda Silva
  • José Lino Costa
  • Pedro Raposo de Almeida
  • Maria José Costa
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 183)

Abstract

The intertidal benthic invertebrate community adjacent to “Parque das Naç õ es”, Tagus estuary, western Portugal, was studied at seven sites between October of 1996 and 2002. Grain size analysis revealed that the area was essentially muddy with total organic matter ranging from 5.4 to 11.4%. Annelida represented more than 85% of the total abundance. The dominant taxa were Oligochaeta, Streblospio shrubsolii, Scrobicularia plana, Hediste diversicolor, Hydrobia ulvae and Cirratulidae. Analysis of abundance revealed high seasonal and interannual heterogeneity, although clear aggregations between winter/spring and summer/autumn sampling periods were detected by multivariate techniques. Paragnathia formica and Dolichopodidae were closely related to winter/spring cluster while S. shrubsolii, Cossura sp., S. plana and Corbula gibba were associated to the summer/autumn aggregation. Although other taxa were abundant in several seasons, constancy in their numbers throughout the year could be observed. Temperature, rainfall and daylight hours were the environmental variables best related to the biological data. Temperature and daylight hours were important for the establishment of the two seasonal aggregations. Rainfall has also shown to be an essential factor on the structuring of this intertidal community, closely related to the abundance increase of Cirratulidade and decrease of Polydora sp., Nephtys spp., Cerastoderma glaucum, Corophium spp. and other Gammaridea. Sediment composition seems to play an important role in changing the community characteristics during the year since some species abundance appear to be favoured by coarser particles and many by fine sediments.

Key words

macrofauna community structure intertidal habitat soft-sediments environmental factors Portugal 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrantes, A., F. Pinto & M. H. Moreira, 1999. Ecology of the polychaete Nereis diversicolor in the Canal de Mira (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal): populations dynamics, production and oogenic cycle. Acta Oecologica 20: 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous, 1992. Dados astronómicos para os almanaques de 1993 para Portugal. Observatório Astronómico de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal 73 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous, 1997. SPSS Base 7.5 Applications Guide. SPSS, Chicago, USA 339 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Bazaïri, H., A. Bayed, M. Glémarec & C. Hily, 2003. Spatial organisation of macrozoobenthic communities in response to environmental factors in a coastal lagoon of the NW African coast (Meja Zerga, Morocco). Oceanologica Acta 26: 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilyard, G. R., 1987. The value of benthic infauna in marine pollution monitoring studies. Marine Pollution Bulletin 18: 581–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borja, A., F. Aguirrezabalaga, J. Martinez, C. Sola, L. Garcia-Arberas & M. Gorostiaga, 2004. Benthic communities, biogeography and resources management. In Borja, A. & M. Collins (eds), Oceanography and Marine Environment of the Basque Country. Elsevier Oceanography. (Series 70). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 455–492.Google Scholar
  7. Borja, A., J. Franco & V. Pérez, 2000. A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40: 1100–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. Šmilauer, 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination. Version 4.5. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA 500 pp.Google Scholar
  9. ter Braak, C. J. & P. F. Verdonschot, 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences 57: 255–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cabral, H. N. R., 1998. Utilizaçã o do estuário do Tejo como área de viveiro pelos linguados, Solea solea (L. 1758) e Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858, e o robalo, Dicentrarchus labrax (L., 1758). Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 396 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Calvário, J., 1982. Estudo ambiental do estuário do Tejo: povoamentos bentónicos intertidais (substratos móveis). CNA TEJO 19, Rel 18, Comissã o Nacional do Ambiente, Lisboa, Portugal, 53 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Costa, M. J., P. R. Almeida, H. N. Cabral, J. L. Costa, M. J. Correia, L. S. Gordo, C. D. Pereira, J. F. Salgado & C. M. Teixeira, 1999. Monitorizaçã o da comunidade de invertebrados bentónicos durante a construçã o da Ponte Vasco da Gama. In Santana, F., L. Vasconcelos, M. R. Partidário, M. J. Seixas, & M. P. Sobral (eds), Actas da 6a Conferência Nacional sobre a Qualidade do Ambiente. DCEA/FCT/UNL, Monte da Caparica, Portugal: 161–170.Google Scholar
  13. Cowie, P. R., S. Widdicombe & M. C. Austen, 2000. Effects of physical disturbance on an estuarine intertidal community: field and mesocosm results compared. Marine Biology 136: 485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Creutzberg, F., P. Wapenaar, G. Duineveld & N. Lopez Lopez, 1984. Distribution and density of the benthic fauna in the Southern North Sea in relation to bottom characteristics and hydrographic conditions. Rapports et Procès-Verbaux des Réunions du Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 183: 101–110.Google Scholar
  15. Cunha, M. R., J. C. Sorbe & M. H. Moreira, 2000. The amphipod Corophium multisetosum (Corophiidae) in Ria de Aveiro (NW Portugal). I. Life hystory and aspects of reproductive biology. Marine Biology 137: 637–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dales, R. P., 1951. An annual history of a population of Nereis diversicolor O.F. Müller. The Biological Bulletin 101: 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dauer, D. M. & R. W. Alden III, 1995. Long-term trends in the macrobenthos and water quality of the lower Chesapeake Bay (1985–1991). Marine Pollution Bulletin 30: 840–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Desmond, J. S., D. H. Deutschman & J. B. Zedler, 2002. Spatial and temporal variation in estuarine fish and invertebrate assemblages: analysis of an11-year data set. Estuaries 25: 552–569.Google Scholar
  19. Fauchald K. 1977. The Polychaete worms: definitions and keys to the Orders, Families and Genera. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Scientia (Series 28), Los Angeles, USA, 188.Google Scholar
  20. Gaudêncio, M. J., M. T. Guerra & M. Glémarec, 1991. Recherches biosédimentaires sur la zone maritime de l’estuaire du Tage, Portugal: données sédimentaires préliminaires. In Elliot, M. & J.-C. Ducrotoy (eds), Estuaries and Coasts: Spatial and Temporal Intercomparisons. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark: 11–16.Google Scholar
  21. Grall, J. & M. Glémarec, 1997. Using biotic indices to estimate macrobenthic community perturbations in the Bay of Brest. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 44: 43–53.Google Scholar
  22. Grémare, A., J. M. Amouroux & G. Vétion, 1998. Long-term comparison of macrobenthos within the soft bottoms of the Banylus-sur-mer (northwestern Mediterranean Sea). Journal of Sea Research 40: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guerreiro, J., 1998. Growth and production of the bivalve Scrobicularia plana in two southern European estuaries. Vie et Milieu 48: 121–131.Google Scholar
  24. Herman, P. M. J., J. J. Middelburg, J. van de Koppel & C. H. R. Heip, 1999. Ecology of estuarine macrobenthos. Advances in Ecological Research 29: 195–240.Google Scholar
  25. Hily, C., H. Le Bris & M. Glémarec, 1986. Impacts biologiques des emissaries urbains sur les ecosystems benthiques. Océanis 12: 419–426.Google Scholar
  26. Ibanez, F. & J.-C. Dauvin, 1988. Long-term changes (1977 to 1987) in a muddy fine sand Abra alba-Melinna palmata community from the Western English Channel: multivariate timeseries analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 49: 65–81.Google Scholar
  27. Jensen, J. N., 1990. Increased abundance and growth of the suspension-feeding bivalve Corbula gibba in a shallow part of the eutrophic Limfjord, Denmark. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 27: 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Junoy, J. & J. M. Viétiez, 1990. Macrozoobenthic community structure in the Ria de Foz, an intertidal estuary (Galicia, Northwest Spain). Marine Biology 107: 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lardicci, C., G. Ceccherelli & F. Rossi, 1997. Streblospio shrubsolii (Polychaeta: Spionidae): temporal fluctuations in size and reproductive activity. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 38: 207–214.Google Scholar
  30. Lillebø, A. I., M. A. Pardal & J. C. Marques, 1999. Populationstructure, dynamics and production of Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) (Mollusca: Prosobranchia) along an eutrophication gradient in the Mondego estuary (Portugal). Acta Oecologica 20: 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. López-Jamar, E., O. Francesch, A. V. Dorrio & S. Parra, 1995. Long term variation of the infaunal benthos of La Coruna Bay (NW Spain): results from a 12-year study (1982–1993). Scientia Marina 59: 49–61.Google Scholar
  32. López-Jamar, E., G. González & J. Mejuto, 1986. Temporal changes of community structure and biomass in subtidal macroinfaunal assemblages in La Coruña bay, NW Spain. Hydrobiologia 142: 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marques, J. C., M. A. Pardal & P. Maranhão, 2002. Characterisation of the macroinvertebrate benthic communities in the Mondego estuary. In Pardal, M. A., J. C. Marques, & M. A. S. Graça (eds), Aquatic Ecology of the Mondego River Estuary Basin: Global Importance of Local Experience. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal: 125–134.Google Scholar
  34. Marsh, A. G. & K. R. Tenore, 1990. The role of nutrition in regulating the population dynamics of opportunistic, surface deposit feeders in a mesohaline community. Limnology and Oceanography 35: 710–724.Google Scholar
  35. Mucha, A. P. & M. H. Costa, 1999. Macrozoobenthic community structure in two Portuguese estuaries: relationship with organic enrichment and nutrient gradients. Acta Oecologica 20: 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mucha, A. P., M. T. S. D. Vasconcelos & A. Bordalo, 2003. Macrobenthic community in the Douro estuary: relations with trace metals and natural sediment characteristics. Environmental Pollution 121: 169–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pearson, T. H. & R. Rosenberg, 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 16: 229–311.Google Scholar
  38. Pereira, C. D., M. J. Gaudêncio, M. T. Guerra & M. T. Lopes, 1997. Intertidal macrozoobenthos of the Tagus estuary (Portugal): the Expo’98 area. Publicaciones Especiales del Instituto Español de Oceanografí a. 23: 107–120.Google Scholar
  39. Petersen, C. G. J., 1913. Valuation of the sea. II. The animal communities of the sea-bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. Report of the Danish Biological Station 21: 1–42.Google Scholar
  40. Petersen, C. G. J., 1918. The sea bottom and the production of fish-food. Report of the Danish Biological Station 25: 1–62.Google Scholar
  41. Planas, M. & J. Mora, 1987. Dinámica poblacional de Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) en la ria de Pontevedra (NO España). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 28: 447–464.Google Scholar
  42. Quintino, V. & A. M. Rodrigues, 1989. Environment gradients and distribution of macrozoobenthos in three Portuguese coastal systems: Obidos, Albufeira and Alvor. In Ryland, J. S. & P. A. Tyler (eds), Reproduction, Genetics and Distributions of Marine Organisms. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark: 441–450.Google Scholar
  43. Reise, K., 1982. Long-term changes in the macrobenthic invertebrate fauna of theWadden Sea: are polychaetes about to take over?. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 16: 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robineau, B., 1987. Caractérisation des peuplements macrozoobenthiques de l’estuaire de la Loire. Vie et Milieu 87: 67–76.Google Scholar
  45. Rodrigues, A. M. & V. Quintino, 1993. Horizontal biosedimentary gradients across the Sado estuary, W Portugal. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 27: 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rodrigues A. M., S. Meireles, T. Pereira, A. Gama, V. Quintino. Spatial patterns of benthic invertebrates in intertidal areas of a southern European estuary: the Tagus, Portugal. Hydrobiologia 555: 99–113.Google Scholar
  47. Rumohr, H., 1999. Soft bottom macrofauna: collection, treatment, and quality assurance of samples (Revision of No. 8). ICES Techiques in Marine Environmental Sciences 27: 1–19.Google Scholar
  48. Russell, P. J. C., 1971. A reappraisal of the geographical distributions of the cockles, Cardium edule L. and C. glaucum Bruguièrre. Journal of Conchology 27: 225–234.Google Scholar
  49. Salen-Picard, C. & D. Arlhac, 2002. Long-term changes in a Mediterranen benthic community: relationships between the polychaete assemblages and hydrological variations of the Rhô ne River. Estuaries 25: 1121–1130.Google Scholar
  50. Sardá, R. & D. Martin, 1993. Populations of Streblospio (Polychaeta: Spionidae) in temperate zones: demography and production. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K. 73: 769–784.Google Scholar
  51. Siegel, S. & N. J. Castellan, 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill International Editions, New York, USA 399 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Silva, G., J. L. Costa, P. R. Almeida, L. S. Gordo & M. J. Costa, 1999. A comunidade de macroinvertebrados na monitorizaçã o da EXPO’98. In Santana, F., L. Vasconcelos, M. R. Partidário, M. J. Seixas, & M. P. Sobral (eds), Actas da 6a Conferência Nacional sobre a Qualidade do Ambiente. DCEA/FCT/UNL, Monte da Caparica, Portugal: 271–276.Google Scholar
  53. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research (3rd ed.). W.H. Freeman, New York, USA 887 pp.Google Scholar
  54. Thorson, G., 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). Memoirs of the Geological Society of America 67: 461–534.Google Scholar
  55. Upton, N. P. D., 1987. Gregarious larval settlement within a restricted intertidal zone and sex differences in subsequent mortality in the polygynous saltmarsh isopod Paragnathia formica (Crustacea: Isopoda). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K. 67: 663–678.Google Scholar
  56. Wolff, W. J., 1973. The estuary as a habitat. An analysis of data on the soft-bottom macrofuna of the estuarine area of the rivers Rhine, Meuse, and Scheldt. Zoologische Verhandelingen 126: 1–242.Google Scholar
  57. Woodin, S. A., 1974. Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft sediment environment: the importance of biological interactions. Ecological Monographs 44: 171 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ysebaert, T. & P. M. J. Herman, 2002. Spatial and temporal variation in benthic macrofauna and relationships with environmental variables in an estuarine, intertidal soft-sediment environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 244: 105–124.Google Scholar
  59. Ysebaert, T., P. M. J. Herman, P. Meire, J. Craeymeersch, H. Verbeek & C. H. R. Heip, 2003. Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries: estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary, NW Europe. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science 57: 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilda Silva
    • 1
  • José Lino Costa
    • 1
  • Pedro Raposo de Almeida
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maria José Costa
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Instituto de OceanografiaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de BiologiaUnidade de Biologia da ConservaçãoÉvoraPortugal
  3. 3.Departamento de Biologia AnimalFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations