Advertisement

SUPPORTING THE SITING OF NEW URBAN DEVELOPMENTS FOR INTEGRATED URBAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

  • DAVID BUTLER
  • ANNA KOKKALIDOU
  • CHRISTOS K. MAKROPOULOS
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Security through Science Series book series

Abstract

Establishing the best location for new urban developments requires a synthesis of a variety of factors that, in view of sustainability principles, need to encompass technical and environmental issues related to urban water as well as broader requirements related to the economic and social characteristics and constraints of the region. The complexity of the problem requires a concise, structured and objective method of data organisation and analysis. Decision support systems (DSS) provide such a framework, aided by the incorporation of multi-criteria analysis. This chapter details the development of a DSS tool, based on a fuzzy inference methodology, able to prioritise areas suitable for new urban areas and to screen out unsuitable sites. The effectiveness of the tool was tested on the Humber sub-region in the UK. Results suggest that the overall suitability evaluation is mostly influenced by the choice of site attributes taken into account and to a lesser degree by analytical processes. It is concluded that the tool is flexible and user friendly and can significantly assist in the assessment and visualisation of the effect of spatial characteristics and user preferences on the siting of new urban developments.

Keywords

Decision Support System Urban Development Fuzzy Inference System Urban Water Decision Support Tool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, M. P., G. Rushton, R. Honey, B. T. Dalziel, P. Lolonis, S. De and Densham P. J., 1991, Decision support for regionalization: A spatial decision support system for regionalizing service delivery systems, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 15(1–2): 37–53. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashley, R., Blackwood, D., Butler, D. and Jowitt, P., 2004, Sustainable Water Services: A procedural guide (SWARD), IWA Publishing. Google Scholar
  3. EU Water Framework Directive 2000(60) EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000: Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Google Scholar
  4. Eurostat, 1999, Towards Environmental Pressure Indicators for the EU. European Communities, Luxembourg Google Scholar
  5. Makropoulos, C. 2003, Spatial decision support for urban water management, Unpublished PhD thesis, Imperial College London. Google Scholar
  6. Makropoulos, C. K and Butler, D., 2004, Spatial decisions under uncertainty: Fuzzy inference in urban water management, Journal of Hydroinformatics. 6(1):3–18. Google Scholar
  7. Makropoulos, C. K., Butler, D. and Maksimovic, C., 2003, Fuzzy logic spatial decision support system for urban water management, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 129(1): 69–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Makropoulos, C., M. Morley, F. A. Memon, D. Butler, D. Savic and Ashley, R., 2005, A Decision Support Framework for Sustainable Urban Water Planning and Management in New Urban Areas. Proc. 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Copenhagen, Denmark. Google Scholar
  9. Malczewski, J., 1999, GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google Scholar
  10. MathWorks, 2000, Fuzzy Logic Toolbox User's Guide. Version 2, MATLAB 12, Mathworks. Google Scholar
  11. Nauta, T. A., A. E. Bongco and Santos-Borja, A. C., 2003, Set-up of a decision support system to support sustainable development of the Laguna de Bay, Philippines, Marine Pollution Bulletin. 47(1–6): 211–218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1998, Towards Sustainable Development - Environmental Indicators. OECD, Paris. Google Scholar
  13. Sprague, R. H., 1980, A Framework for the Development of Decision Support Systems, MIS Quarterly, 4 (4): 1–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. The UK National Planning Policy; PPG3, PPG9, PPG13, PPG25. Google Scholar
  15. Thomas, M.R., 2002, A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment, Landscape and Urban Planning. 58(1): 7–23. Google Scholar
  16. Tiwari, D. N., R. Loof and Paudyal, G. N., 1999, Environmental-economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques, Agricultural Systems. 60(2): 99–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. United Nations, 1996, Indicators of Sustainable Development Framework and Methodologies. United Nations, New York. Google Scholar
  18. Water UK, 2000, Towards environmental sustainability: indicators for the UK water industry. Google Scholar
  19. Zhu, X., R. J. Aspinall and Healey, R. G., 1996, ILUDSS: A knowledge-based spatial decision support system for strategic land-use planning, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 15(4): 279–301. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • DAVID BUTLER
    • 1
  • ANNA KOKKALIDOU
    • 1
  • CHRISTOS K. MAKROPOULOS
    • 1
  1. 1.Imperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations