Meeting the Climate Change Challenge

Towards social and technical innovations for a functional society
  • C. Rynikiewicz


This paper aims at giving quantitative figures on the climate and energy challenge that may change the conditions in which business industry is operating. The material efficiency approach along the whole life cycle of products and services enables to show how to shift away from the unsustainable “business as usual scenario”. Indeed, climate policy often focuses on energy systems and price of carbon and technological options and may fail to foster sufficiency solutions compatible with business objectives and a more functional society. A focus on R&D needs and appropriate technological, economical and social framework to enhance the shift to sustainable “product service systems” is needed.


Emission Reduction Climate Policy Energy Price Carbon Price Industrial Ecology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Eickhout B., Den Elzen M.G.J., Vuuren D.P. van, (2003), “Multi-gas emission profiles for stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations, Report 728001026, RIVM, Netherlands. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hare B., M. Meinshausen, (2004), “How much warming are we committed to and how much can be avoided? ”, PIK report n°93. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grass I., Schellnhuber H.J., et al., (2003), “Climate Protection Strategies for the 21st Century : Kyoto and Beyond”, WBGU, Berlin. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    CNRS/LEPII-EPE, RIVM/MNP, ICCS-NTUA, CES-KUL, (2003), “Greenhouse Gas Reduction Pathways in the UNFCCC process up to 2025”. comm/environment/climat/studies.htm Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reinaud J., (2004), “Industrial competitiveness under the European Union Emissions trading Scheme”, information paper, IEA, Paris. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission, (2003),."World Energy, Technology and climate policy Outlook 2030”, EUR, Brussels. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Criqui P., Kouvaritakis N., Soria A., Isoard F., (1999), “Technical change and CO2 emission reduction strategies: from exogenous to endogenous technology in the POLES model”, in Le progrès technique face aux défis énergétiques du futur, colloque européen de l'énergie, AEE, Paris, 473–488. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman C., (1992), The Economics of hope : essays on technical change, economic growth and the environment, Pinter, New York, 243 p. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jochem E, Madlenee R., (2003), “The forgotten benefits of climate change mitigation: innovation, technological leapfrogging employment, and sustainable development”, OECD, ENV/EPOC/GSP(2003)16/FINAL. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weisacker E., Lovins A.B., Lovins L.H, (1997), Factor four : doubling wealth, halving ressource use, Earthscan, London. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cline W.R, (2004), “Meeting the challenge of global warming”, Copenhagen Consensus challenge paper, Environmental Assessment Institute. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newell R., Pizer W., (2001), “Discounting the benefits of climate change mitigation”, Pew Center for Global Climate Change, Arlington, USA. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hurdelbrink R.J., (1991), “Implications of materials shifts”, the New Material Society, Vol. 3, US Governement Printing office, Ch 6. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Labys, W., (2001), “Transmaterialisation”, Handbook of industrial ecology, Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adriaanse A., et al., (1997), Resources flows : the material basis of industrial economies, World Ressources Institute, Washington. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bringezu S., (2003), “Industrial ecology and material flow analysis: basic concepts, policy relevance and some case studies”, in Bourg, D. and Erkman, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Industrial Ecology, Greenleaf, Sheffield; UK. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jochem E., Spreng D., Favrat D., Von Rohr R.P., Hungerbühler K., Wokaun A., Zimmermann M., (2002), “Steps towards a 2000 Watt Society. a White Paper”, Input paper to an international workshop on September 2002, Zurich. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ehrlich P.R., Holdren J.P., (1971), “Impact of Population Growth." Science 171, pp. 1212–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holmberg J., Azar C., Sten K., (2002), “Decoupling. Past trends and prospects for the future”, Environmental Advisory Council Ministry of the Environment of Sweden, Chalmers and Göteborg University. Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    programme ETAP or EU Steel Technological Platforms and ULCOS (Ultra Low CO2 Steelmaking) program. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Worrell E., Levine M.D., Price L.K., Martin N.C., Van den Broek R., Blok K., (1996), “Efficient Use of Energy and Materials: Progress and Policies”, a report by the Secre-tary-General of the United Nations, vol. 3, n° 20. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pacala S. and Socolow R., (2004), “Stabilization wedges: Solving the carbon problem with technologies available today." Science, n° 305, pp. 968–972. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Okken P.A., and Ybema J.R., (1995), “Three divergent scenarios with 80% CO2 reduction”, in Energy technologies to reduce CO2 emissions in Europe : prospects, competition, synergy, IEA/OECD, Paris. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ayres R.U., Ayres L.W., (1996), Industrial Ecology : Towards closing the materials cycle, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK / Brookfield, USA. Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vellinga P. and Herb N. (eds.), (1999), “Industrial Transformation Science Plan”, report, International Human Dimensions Programme (IHDP), Bonn. Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gianrini, O., and Stahel, W.R., (1989/1993) The Limits to Certainty, facing risks in the new Service Economy, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    European Commission, (2001), “Sustainable production : challenges and objectives for EU research policy”, EUR 19880, Brussels. Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ehrenfeld J., (2001), “Designing 'Sustainable' Product/Service Systems”, Presented at Ecodesign 2001, Tokyo, December 15. Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Becker G.S., (1962), “Irrational behaviour and economic theory”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 70,pp. 1–3. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stahel W.R., (1995), “Product stewardship : increased competitiveness due to a higher resource productivity and a system design”, ISWA Conf., Vienna. Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stahel W.R., (2003), “The Functional society: the service economy”, in Bourg D. and Erkman S. (eds.), Perspectives on industrial ecology, with a foreword by Jacques Chirac, President of France, March, 384 p. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Manzini E., (1996), “Sustainable product services development, Pioneer industries on sustainable service”, in Workshop organised by UNEP-WG-SPD in the INES Conference, 22–25 August, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Montt O., (1999), “PSS : shifting corporate focus from selling products to selling product service system, a new approach to sustainable development”, AFR report 285, Lund University. Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tukker A., Tischner U., (2003), “First report of PSS review”, Suspronet Report. Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Oosterhuis F., Rubik F., Scholl G., (1996), Product policy in Europe : new environmental perspectives. Kluwer, London. Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    White A.L., Stoughton M., and Felg L., (1999), “Servicizing : the quiet transformation to extended producer responsibility”, Tellus Institute, Boston. Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Behrendt S., Jasch C., Kortman J., Hrauda G., Pfitzner R. and Velte D., (2003), Eco-service development: reinventing supply and demand in the European Union, Greenleaf Sheffield. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Rynikiewicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Département Energie et Politiques de l'Environnement (ex IEPE) Lepii-EPE CNRS/Univ. GrenobleGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations